What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Welcome back to the fight, joe. This time I know our side will win.

Kep, I trust Bolton about as much as I trust the Clintons.

Henry "Former advisor to the president and now Master of the World" Kissinger was someone who understood how the world operates.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

Also a world class womanizer, but let's not let that get in the way of your high opinion of him. :rolleyes:

Lyndon LaRouche didn't do much that was intentionally funny, but the nickname "the Bulgarian pederast" has accompanied Kissinger in my thoughts for the last 30 years.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is happening all over. Last time I was in Batumi, Georgia I heard reports of commercial ships whose GPS was spoofed by the Russians to incorrectly show their location as if they were inland at a local (Russian) airport. Dangerous. <a href="https://t.co/OHrezGm7g1">https://t.co/OHrezGm7g1</a></p>— Michael Carpenter (@mikercarpenter) <a href="https://twitter.com/mikercarpenter/status/1125392867302825985?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 6, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

So...we bombed Iranian oil tankers, the cia is encouraging a coup in Venezuela and are we’re ****ing on North Korea (again)is it wrong of me to suggest we change the national anthem to this: https://youtu.be/jqnC54vbUbU


???
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

:confused:

where?
mookie went out and looked for smoke... nada

All I could find is a planted story in some righty conspiracy sites about Iran sabotaging oil tankers. But these are the same sites that are always saying Iran is about to nuke DC so we better do whatever Bibi says oh and buy gold!
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

All I could find is a planted story in some righty conspiracy sites about Iran sabotaging oil tankers. But these are the same sites that are always saying Iran is about to nuke DC so we better do whatever Bibi says oh and buy gold!

yah... nothing about the us dropping bombs.

did see video of the hole in the norway tankers. maybe 10m in length on the stern and set under the waterline.

of course mookie is confused why a norway tanker is in the gulf. they have enough oil as it is. not sure why they need ksa oil :confused: hard to believe they have downtime to ship saudi oil elsewhere for work
 
Lol. Stop.

No. I refuse to be silent when Bolton and others (ahem, Langley) are beating war drums in at least 3 separate countries.

https://www.apnews.com/3884ea5ef0084d7a9e8a7d48c03fb69e

I would ask given the MIC/CIA’s history going back to Korea who in their right mind would commit an act like this? Knowing full well a U.S. invasion is quite possible?

Prepare for another gulf of Tonkin. That’s where the Bolton’s are taking us.
 
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?

And more food for thought: https://t.co/hFIbBF0J9x

There are Olympian logical jumps in that piece.

One can know the USG lies and still think it likely Syria uses chemical weapons.

You should also know there is a global industry in agitprop serving Russian interests. You may have read something about it pertaining to the last US election.
 
There are Olympian logical jumps in that piece.

One can know the USG lies and still think it likely Syria uses chemical weapons.

You should also know there is a global industry in agitprop serving Russian interests. You may have read something about it pertaining to the last US election.

Yes, but Caitlin Johnstone is not agitprop imo. I’ve been reading her stuff for several years and have not detected disinformation.

Now, I could be wrong and she is Kim Philby part 2, but that’s Not an impression i’ve Gotten from reading her stuff which is almost exclusively anti-war, anti-empire/hegemony etc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top