D
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Guest
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
We’ve defeated ISIS in Syria
We’ve defeated ISIS in Syria
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
- Status
aparch
Acetaminamerican
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sarah Sanders re: <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Syria?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Syria</a>: "We have started returning United States troops home as we transition to the next phase of this campaign."<br>Let me guess - the "humanitarian" phase, as directed by Putin in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Helsinki?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Helsinki</a> ?<a href="https://t.co/eZ7hW6sYPQ">https://t.co/eZ7hW6sYPQ</a> <a href="https://t.co/incrNZLHpv">pic.twitter.com/incrNZLHpv</a></p>— Julia Davis (@JuliaDavisNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1075425307404984323?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 19, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sarah Sanders re: <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Syria?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Syria</a>: "We have started returning United States troops home as we transition to the next phase of this campaign."<br>Let me guess - the "humanitarian" phase, as directed by Putin in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Helsinki?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Helsinki</a> ?<a href="https://t.co/eZ7hW6sYPQ">https://t.co/eZ7hW6sYPQ</a> <a href="https://t.co/incrNZLHpv">pic.twitter.com/incrNZLHpv</a></p>— Julia Davis (@JuliaDavisNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1075425307404984323?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 19, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
bull****.
bull****.
St. Clown
Liberal Rebel Scum, apparently
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
Is any of that accurate?
Is any of that accurate?
aparch
Acetaminamerican
To be fair, I learned my russian at JC Pennys...
... but Google Translate is batting decently when putting the American word in and translating to Russian. The handwriting makes it tougher to match exactly, but it's close enough where I'd trust her.
The original source photo seems to be bullet points that Putin and Trump talked about in Helsinki; and it's written large enough to be used as a prop for the media to see, likely for Putin to say "Yep, here's what we talked about, innocuous stuff."
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
Memories .....
https://youtu.be/Z1QVthvDhPo
Memories .....
https://youtu.be/Z1QVthvDhPo
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
Oh and that's where the story ends...for us that is.
Oh and that's where the story ends...for us that is.
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
Pat B on the Middle East and the War Party
https://buchanan.org/blog/how-the-war-party-lost-the-middle-east-130897
Pat B on the Middle East and the War Party
https://buchanan.org/blog/how-the-war-party-lost-the-middle-east-130897
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
Hack piece of journalism. Joe, can you disagree that this is total tripe?
Pat takes a questionable move on Trumps part (vacating the middle east), absolves him of any blame by tying that outcome to other presidents, up plays Obamas role (never mind BO inherited everything)...and then titles the article 'how the war party lost the middle east'.
1. Republicans have always been 100% to blame for the debacle in the middle east. Bush even said 'history will judge me'. Many Democrats refused to give him authorization. Pretty much all Republicans did.
2. In 2003, about 60% of liberals opposed invading Iraq. Only 27% of conservatives did. https://news.gallup.com/poll/7699/b...-groups-most-likely-oppose-iraq-invasion.aspx
3. ISIS came from Iraq's chaos and American occupation of Muslim holy ground. What is Obama supposed to do? Allow for another OBL?
Pat Buchanan is given credit for some positive opinions on global policy. But he's as steeped in fake news as Anne Coulter.
Hack piece of journalism. Joe, can you disagree that this is total tripe?
Pat takes a questionable move on Trumps part (vacating the middle east), absolves him of any blame by tying that outcome to other presidents, up plays Obamas role (never mind BO inherited everything)...and then titles the article 'how the war party lost the middle east'.
1. Republicans have always been 100% to blame for the debacle in the middle east. Bush even said 'history will judge me'. Many Democrats refused to give him authorization. Pretty much all Republicans did.
2. In 2003, about 60% of liberals opposed invading Iraq. Only 27% of conservatives did. https://news.gallup.com/poll/7699/b...-groups-most-likely-oppose-iraq-invasion.aspx
3. ISIS came from Iraq's chaos and American occupation of Muslim holy ground. What is Obama supposed to do? Allow for another OBL?
Pat Buchanan is given credit for some positive opinions on global policy. But he's as steeped in fake news as Anne Coulter.
D
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Guest
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
Yes let’s go on about Obama, while barely mentioning who got us into this crap in the first place.
Joe should be ashamed for posting such a pile of crap
Yes let’s go on about Obama, while barely mentioning who got us into this crap in the first place.
Joe should be ashamed for posting such a pile of crap
So it is a bad idea to get out of a bad idea?
D
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Guest
What you posted was a biased, ill written piece of crap. I don’t take any of what he says seriously esp. based on how this piece is written.
And no you can’t just decide to pull out in two weeks and call it a day. That’s not how it should happen
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
Just pull out is joe's answer to all problems
Just pull out is joe's answer to all problems
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
What part of the pottery barn rule did the GOP not understand?
What part of the pottery barn rule did the GOP not understand?
St. Clown
Liberal Rebel Scum, apparently
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
At this point? Yes, it is. We can't stir up a ****storm, muddle around in it for a period of time, and then walk away to let the pieces fall where they may. We inserted ourselves and need to see it through to the end. We didn't do that in Vietnam, and it's quickly becoming our MO throughout the world. That's not what a leader's reputation should be - can be - if we want to continue holding on to our reputation as a world leader.
At this point? Yes, it is. We can't stir up a ****storm, muddle around in it for a period of time, and then walk away to let the pieces fall where they may. We inserted ourselves and need to see it through to the end. We didn't do that in Vietnam, and it's quickly becoming our MO throughout the world. That's not what a leader's reputation should be - can be - if we want to continue holding on to our reputation as a world leader.
Re: US Foreign Policy 2.0: Have you read Kipling, Mr. Tillerson?
What does that have to do with the article? Its purpose was to absolve the president and GOP of all blame for the current mess and any of its outcome.
What does that have to do with the article? Its purpose was to absolve the president and GOP of all blame for the current mess and any of its outcome.
D
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Guest
Ding ding ding
- Status