NCAA watcher
Registered User
Sorry for the long and winding road today, folks. Hopefully 2022 marks a turnaround of fortunes for UNH Hockey, we'll see who gets appointed as the new AD, and wait for the dominoes to fall ...
I was just thinking the exact thing on my walk today. The fate of UNH hockey rides on a good choice.
Ironically, it was after the heart attack when Umile entered the prime "apex" seasons for the program, with 4 FF trips out of the next 6 seasons, including the back-to-back HEA titles at the end of that period. His explosions on the bench toned down in volume and severity, reflecting ATW's recollection. Those six years convinced a few of us that the "can't win the big ones" thing was overstated, but once Coaches Serino (Merrimack after '98) and McCloskey (UNH Women after '02) moved on, the slippage began, slowly but steadily.
Convinced us, or convinced recruits

even if you believe Umile should have retired sooner, the pivotal point seems to have circa 2014, when if Umile had retired, he'd have saved himself the tarnishing of his reputation of his last few unsuccessful seasons (repeating Coach Holt's error, and then some), and been able to turn over the program in much more decent shape to an experienced successor.
I have no issue with a coach hanging on a bit too long. It's part of the bargain, just like signing free agents knowing you'll be losing value the last bit. That tarnish fades as the years go on.
Where he/Blue Skies destroyed the future was in the replacement process and the replacement choice. At that point, a change in culture was needed. Here's Bill Barr speaking of the importance of changing culture after losing seasons:
Maine coach Ben Barr says he's been searching for a long time for the next Ross Mauermann, who helped change the culture at PC. And Barr believes he's found him in freshman David Breazeale.
We all knew the choice of Souza was not based on merit, and unfortunately, so too did the recruits.
NCAA watcher replied
04-28-2016, 10:17 AM
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond
3) Part of my unhappiness/expressed concern was that I always felt a change at UNH would be sudden, dramatic, and a huge selling point with momentum. (And I don't mean necessarily getting a Tony Granato type name. I was thinking this momentum would work even if they got a Guy Gadowsky a couple years back at Princeton, or another up and coming HC/established assistant like Ben Barr). We can debate how realistic that would have been is debatable. That UNH chose to do this gradually, and with a replacement well down the "known" scale, prevented any of that buzz. Now, I suspect we are on a much more gradual Union/Quinnipiac/Yale model, that build gradually and occasionally hit the mark with a surprise developing kid (the Ghostebieres, Anas, etc, of the world). If you want to know my antipathy toward Dick Umile, it is not directed at Souza because of Souza's merits, but rather that Umile imposed a model very different than the one I thought would be in UNH's best interest. For example, I would have felt differently if he had announced he was retiring in 3 years, and at that point UNH tabbed Souza based on his success the next 3 years either at U.Conn or even as an assistant at UNH. Even then it would be an easier sale to the kids that UNH has tabbed a "rising star" who can point to U.Conn's rise from 11th in HE to 7th from 2013 to 2018, or who recruited X, Y and Z to UNH from 2015 to 2018. That actual success would be a selling point. Instead, we have Umile picking a kid who has the skills needed, but lacks a track record. And I say this as a type B personality, but Souza doesn't strike me as a Type A, Shawn Walsh guy who has a definite plan to assume control on day 1 -- and even if he does, Umile's plan prevented that. I genuinely hope Souza can do everything that has been put on his plate, but I think Umile did him a great disservice. I'm glad to see some movement on him imparting his plan, making realistic decisions on existing committed players..
Sadly, Souza didn't have a plan.
Plus, add in Souza's statements in 2016 about his philosophy of a physical team vs. recruiting skill:
2) Ability to sell vs. scout. I have no doubt that Corson Green has interest from others, but would not put him in the fought over category. Souza seems to be more comfortable jumping on kids before the recruiting war develops. He's going to have to be a pretty good scout to identify those hidden gems, because there's 60 some odd teams that know about these kids but have not pulled the trigger yet. I'm willing to wait and see on those, though I personally am less comfortable with that model, having seen too many "unkown but I see something" Dylan Mallers not develop. Even with Lowell's success I would not be comfortable with their recruit pipeline. Add in Souza's philosophy of size more so than skill (which is where he had success in finding the unknowns like Tyler Thompson) and we just differ on philosophy.
funny that when you recruit size vs. skill, you end up averaging 1.5 goals a game.
Last edited: