What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UNH Wildcats 2021/2022 - Return of the Champions of October?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry for the long and winding road today, folks. Hopefully 2022 marks a turnaround of fortunes for UNH Hockey, we'll see who gets appointed as the new AD, and wait for the dominoes to fall ...

I was just thinking the exact thing on my walk today. The fate of UNH hockey rides on a good choice.


Ironically, it was after the heart attack when Umile entered the prime "apex" seasons for the program, with 4 FF trips out of the next 6 seasons, including the back-to-back HEA titles at the end of that period. His explosions on the bench toned down in volume and severity, reflecting ATW's recollection. Those six years convinced a few of us that the "can't win the big ones" thing was overstated, but once Coaches Serino (Merrimack after '98) and McCloskey (UNH Women after '02) moved on, the slippage began, slowly but steadily.

Convinced us, or convinced recruits ;) To quote our common friend, "We're only immortal, for a limited time." The image of UNH that McCloskey was able to sell started to slip, and once you lose the perception, results follow.

even if you believe Umile should have retired sooner, the pivotal point seems to have circa 2014, when if Umile had retired, he'd have saved himself the tarnishing of his reputation of his last few unsuccessful seasons (repeating Coach Holt's error, and then some), and been able to turn over the program in much more decent shape to an experienced successor.

I have no issue with a coach hanging on a bit too long. It's part of the bargain, just like signing free agents knowing you'll be losing value the last bit. That tarnish fades as the years go on.

Where he/Blue Skies destroyed the future was in the replacement process and the replacement choice. At that point, a change in culture was needed. Here's Bill Barr speaking of the importance of changing culture after losing seasons:
Maine coach Ben Barr says he's been searching for a long time for the next Ross Mauermann, who helped change the culture at PC. And Barr believes he's found him in freshman David Breazeale.

We all knew the choice of Souza was not based on merit, and unfortunately, so too did the recruits.

NCAA watcher replied
04-28-2016, 10:17 AM
Re: UNH Commits & Recruiting: 2016 and Beyond

3) Part of my unhappiness/expressed concern was that I always felt a change at UNH would be sudden, dramatic, and a huge selling point with momentum. (And I don't mean necessarily getting a Tony Granato type name. I was thinking this momentum would work even if they got a Guy Gadowsky a couple years back at Princeton, or another up and coming HC/established assistant like Ben Barr). We can debate how realistic that would have been is debatable. That UNH chose to do this gradually, and with a replacement well down the "known" scale, prevented any of that buzz. Now, I suspect we are on a much more gradual Union/Quinnipiac/Yale model, that build gradually and occasionally hit the mark with a surprise developing kid (the Ghostebieres, Anas, etc, of the world). If you want to know my antipathy toward Dick Umile, it is not directed at Souza because of Souza's merits, but rather that Umile imposed a model very different than the one I thought would be in UNH's best interest. For example, I would have felt differently if he had announced he was retiring in 3 years, and at that point UNH tabbed Souza based on his success the next 3 years either at U.Conn or even as an assistant at UNH. Even then it would be an easier sale to the kids that UNH has tabbed a "rising star" who can point to U.Conn's rise from 11th in HE to 7th from 2013 to 2018, or who recruited X, Y and Z to UNH from 2015 to 2018. That actual success would be a selling point. Instead, we have Umile picking a kid who has the skills needed, but lacks a track record. And I say this as a type B personality, but Souza doesn't strike me as a Type A, Shawn Walsh guy who has a definite plan to assume control on day 1 -- and even if he does, Umile's plan prevented that. I genuinely hope Souza can do everything that has been put on his plate, but I think Umile did him a great disservice. I'm glad to see some movement on him imparting his plan, making realistic decisions on existing committed players..

Sadly, Souza didn't have a plan.

Plus, add in Souza's statements in 2016 about his philosophy of a physical team vs. recruiting skill:

2) Ability to sell vs. scout. I have no doubt that Corson Green has interest from others, but would not put him in the fought over category. Souza seems to be more comfortable jumping on kids before the recruiting war develops. He's going to have to be a pretty good scout to identify those hidden gems, because there's 60 some odd teams that know about these kids but have not pulled the trigger yet. I'm willing to wait and see on those, though I personally am less comfortable with that model, having seen too many "unkown but I see something" Dylan Mallers not develop. Even with Lowell's success I would not be comfortable with their recruit pipeline. Add in Souza's philosophy of size more so than skill (which is where he had success in finding the unknowns like Tyler Thompson) and we just differ on philosophy.

funny that when you recruit size vs. skill, you end up averaging 1.5 goals a game.
 
Last edited:
Just curious; does anyone know what kind of contract Souza has? Bringing in a new AD doesn't automatically ensure they are going to fire a coach. Of course, that depends on just WHO that new hire is of course. Bet we'll know after the NCAA tournament and no one should be surprised if/when UNH hires a familiar face. There is still a lot of hockey left as well, and, bet if there is an 'outside' hire other than someone overly familiar with UNH athletics (notice how I'm skirting the issue here) regardless of how UNH ends up this year would not be surprised if there's a 'lets see what happens this year' (meaning the 2022-2023 season) before any HC change is made. Sorry for the run on sentence.
 
Just curious; does anyone know what kind of contract Souza has? Bringing in a new AD doesn't automatically ensure they are going to fire a coach. Of course, that depends on just WHO that new hire is of course. Bet we'll know after the NCAA tournament and no one should be surprised if/when UNH hires a familiar face. There is still a lot of hockey left as well, and, bet if there is an 'outside' hire other than someone overly familiar with UNH athletics (notice how I'm skirting the issue here) regardless of how UNH ends up this year would not be surprised if there's a 'lets see what happens this year' (meaning the 2022-2023 season) before any HC change is made. Sorry for the run on sentence.

I agree. i wouldn't think the new AD will not be ready to pull the trigger immediately .. easier to carry him for one more year to confirm or refute the current trajectory.
As for contracts, it's a complete guess (unless Sean Pickett wants to FOI UNH). But he's had four years (and three as an assistant), so would likely have already run his original deal. Would BlueSkies have given a multi-year extension, or his he year to year now?
 
Just curious; does anyone know what kind of contract Souza has? Bringing in a new AD doesn't automatically ensure they are going to fire a coach. Of course, that depends on just WHO that new hire is of course. Bet we'll know after the NCAA tournament and no one should be surprised if/when UNH hires a familiar face. There is still a lot of hockey left as well, and, bet if there is an 'outside' hire other than someone overly familiar with UNH athletics (notice how I'm skirting the issue here) regardless of how UNH ends up this year would not be surprised if there's a 'lets see what happens this year' (meaning the 2022-2023 season) before any HC change is made. Sorry for the run on sentence.

Way to "skirt the issue" 'Ref. :-)

I don't recall the length of MS7's contract, or whether it's ever been extended. I believe this is his 7th year on the staff, and fourth season in charge. It's possible he is still on his original deal, which I'd guess would have run 6-7 years (the 3 planned assistant seasons, and 3-4 more as HC to allow him to establish his first few recruiting classes), which means the original deal either ended last summer OR will end this summer. IF the latter, I doubt the outgoing AD would have let Souza start a "lame duck" season without a commitment beyond the term, and it'd be tough to justify extending him more than 2 years, based on what he's shown us so far. So my guess is MS7 is not holding a long-term commitment at this point, and a buyout if the new AD chooses to go with someone else shouldn't be more than another year tops. With BS now being on his way out, I don't see UNH allowing any more extensions on his watch. For all we know, BS may have tried to extend MacDonnell already, and when he tried to sell it to Dean Dean, DD (a new one for Darius) suggested retirement was more appropriate for both men instead??

See ... where you "skirt the issue" 'Ref, yours truly engages in rampant speculation. WAY more fun!!

Now DD seems to be fairly "plugged in" to the Athletics side of things, so (more speculation) I would expect him to be right in the midst of the hiring process for the new AD. With a decision already made on Football (Santos), and with Men's Soccer seemingly in very good hands for the foreseeable future, it's hard not to think DD will be looking for someone to revive Hockey (both sides) and Hoops. I'd guess MS7 is on thin ice, more so than even Bill Herrion, but at some point someone at the top should be demanding that Men's Hoops grow and move back across the street. Women's Soccer HC may also be vulnerable, with these PC times being what they are, and with a man with a nondescript W-L record currently in the job.

I would expect DD (and his blue ribbon panel) to question the new AD candidates on not only philosophy and vision issues, but also to plumb their preparedness to bring in a couple of immediate quality new hires in prominent programs, and with Hockey being at the top of that list. In looking at the possibility of a new Men's Hockey HC, I'd want the new AD to already have a short list of candidates he would be looking to consider, whether he is hired at UNH or Fill-In-The-Blank D-1 Hockey University. And if one of those folks on the short list is a prominent respected national candidate - as what happened last offseason (whether unexpectedly or not?) in Orono - I would want that AD candidate to guarantee he would act immediately to get that new person in the door.

When things played out as they did up in Orono last Spring, Coach Barr kind of fell into UMaine's lap, but everyone pretty much knew it was his time to move out and run his own show, regardless of whether Red was going to be extended or not (much less what actually happened). Unfortunately for UNH, we had an AD who was still operating on mediocrity auto-pilot, and would never have thought to make a bold move in (say) mid-April to make a move on Barr before UMaine had time to stop diddling around with their decision, which they actually did leave that door open for way too long, until fate stepped in.

That opportunity was out there, and UNH passed. I probably mentioned it a few times last Spring. It's the whole "fortune favors the brave" thing, and while the ship has sailed on Barr, there will be others in the future that are worthy of immediate consideration. IIRC Dan has worked/is still working in college athletics, it would be interesting to get his latest take on all of this ...
 
Way to "skirt the issue" 'Ref. :-)

I don't recall the length of MS7's contract, or whether it's ever been extended. I believe this is his 7th year on the staff, and fourth season in charge. It's possible he is still on his original deal, which I'd guess would have run 6-7 years (the 3 planned assistant seasons, and 3-4 more as HC to allow him to establish his first few recruiting classes), which means the original deal either ended last summer OR will end this summer. IF the latter, I doubt the outgoing AD would have let Souza start a "lame duck" season without a commitment beyond the term, and it'd be tough to justify extending him more than 2 years, based on what he's shown us so far. So my guess is MS7 is not holding a long-term commitment at this point, and a buyout if the new AD chooses to go with someone else shouldn't be more than another year tops. With BS now being on his way out, I don't see UNH allowing any more extensions on his watch. For all we know, BS may have tried to extend MacDonnell already, and when he tried to sell it to Dean Dean, DD (a new one for Darius) suggested retirement was more appropriate for both men instead??

See ... where you "skirt the issue" 'Ref, yours truly engages in rampant speculation. WAY more fun!!

Now DD seems to be fairly "plugged in" to the Athletics side of things, so (more speculation) I would expect him to be right in the midst of the hiring process for the new AD. With a decision already made on Football (Santos), and with Men's Soccer seemingly in very good hands for the foreseeable future, it's hard not to think DD will be looking for someone to revive Hockey (both sides) and Hoops. I'd guess MS7 is on thin ice, more so than even Bill Herrion, but at some point someone at the top should be demanding that Men's Hoops grow and move back across the street. Women's Soccer HC may also be vulnerable, with these PC times being what they are, and with a man with a nondescript W-L record currently in the job.

I would expect DD (and his blue ribbon panel) to question the new AD candidates on not only philosophy and vision issues, but also to plumb their preparedness to bring in a couple of immediate quality new hires in prominent programs, and with Hockey being at the top of that list. In looking at the possibility of a new Men's Hockey HC, I'd want the new AD to already have a short list of candidates he would be looking to consider, whether he is hired at UNH or Fill-In-The-Blank D-1 Hockey University. And if one of those folks on the short list is a prominent respected national candidate - as what happened last offseason (whether unexpectedly or not?) in Orono - I would want that AD candidate to guarantee he would act immediately to get that new person in the door.

When things played out as they did up in Orono last Spring, Coach Barr kind of fell into UMaine's lap, but everyone pretty much knew it was his time to move out and run his own show, regardless of whether Red was going to be extended or not (much less what actually happened). Unfortunately for UNH, we had an AD who was still operating on mediocrity auto-pilot, and would never have thought to make a bold move in (say) mid-April to make a move on Barr before UMaine had time to stop diddling around with their decision, which they actually did leave that door open for way too long, until fate stepped in.

That opportunity was out there, and UNH passed. I probably mentioned it a few times last Spring. It's the whole "fortune favors the brave" thing, and while the ship has sailed on Barr, there will be others in the future that are worthy of immediate consideration. IIRC Dan has worked/is still working in college athletics, it would be interesting to get his latest take on all of this ...

Chuck...glad you had some fun with my post. DD...well that's a new one! Actually...my intention was more around who the new AD would be, not so much, a coaching change? And if a very familiar face to UNH hockey (that's the 'skirting around part) is hired...you can bet there will be no change in the HC dept. I mean, I'd be shocked... In fact, I almost doubt there would be regardless of who is hired, but, not having a reliable crystal ball, who knows? Looked around for coaching contracts but all I could find was salary. Still, even with the AD change, most likely there's another year here at least. I hope things turn around for the program....for everyone's sake. I'm really looking forward to this coming weekend. We'll see if we can bring the scoring touch back to the 'Whitt...
 
Chuck...glad you had some fun with my post. DD...well that's a new one! Actually...my intention was more around who the new AD would be, not so much, a coaching change? And if a very familiar face to UNH hockey (that's the 'skirting around part) is hired...you can bet there will be no change in the HC dept. I mean, I'd be shocked... In fact, I almost doubt there would be regardless of who is hired, but, not having a reliable crystal ball, who knows? Looked around for coaching contracts but all I could find was salary. Still, even with the AD change, most likely there's another year here at least. I hope things turn around for the program....for everyone's sake. I'm really looking forward to this coming weekend. We'll see if we can bring the scoring touch back to the 'Whitt...

I have to believe if Commish Nigel retained ambitions to be UNH AD, he wouldn't have become Commish Nigel? IF that's the way the job search goes, though, I agree 100%, MS7 ain't going anywhere, anytime soon. We'll see, hopefully sooner than later ...
 
I have to believe if Commish Nigel retained ambitions to be UNH AD, he wouldn't have become Commish Nigel? IF that's the way the job search goes, though, I agree 100%, MS7 ain't going anywhere, anytime soon. We'll see, hopefully sooner than later ...

Commish Nigel oh my. And we wouldn't really call it a "search" now would we....if that was the course of events. (Given the history just saying)
 
Commish Nigel oh my. And we wouldn't really call it a "search" now would we....if that was the course of events. (Given the history just saying)

Agree with you 100%, that wouldn't be any more of a "search" than Football appointing Ricky Santos as HC, or Hockey bringing in MS7 several summers ago.

Given the history of such "searches", none of us should be surprised if Nigel gets the AD nod.

Surprised, no; disappointed, yes. Replacing one "yes man" with an even bigger "yes man" IMO.
 
(repeating Coach Holt's error, and then some)

Chuck, With All Due Respect I have seen you make this statement before, and to use ATW's words "once again you have exaggerated the information to make your own facts. I realize that if you say it you feel it must be true."

Coach Holt passed away more than two decades ago and I'm not sure why you insist on disparaging his legacy. But to compare the end of his tenure and its immediate aftermath to the final years of Dick Umile's isn't even comparing apples to oranges. Its more like comparing a hot dog to a warm puppy. Coach Holt announced DURING the 1985-86 season that it would be his last. No three years notice, with a lengthy transition and a farewell tour. Lets take a look at the end of Holt's tenure. '82 season in Frozen Four (third time in six years.) Back in the NCAA's in '83 season (when 8 teams had to earn their way in as opposed to 16.) Winning record in '83-84, a decided step back in '84-85 (first year of Hockey East. Played 45 games?!?!) Was his last season bad? Absolutely. As was the year that followed.

I was in WBA for Holt's final games as UNH coach in 1986, I was also there two or three seasons later watching UNH lose a game to BU but feeling really good about what I saw from the younger UNH players. It was clear to anyone with an ounce of hockey IQ that there was talent present and the program was on the upswing. Does anybody feel that way about UNH now, or in the past few years? Were the late 80's a tough time to be a UNH fan? Of course, but the program bounced back fairly quickly especially when you consider all that happened inside and outside of it. The team had single digit wins 86 through 88. However in 1990 was a minute away from the Hockey East finals and two years later was in the HE Title Game and back in the NCAA's.

I guess my gripe with drawing comparisons between the end of the two coaching eras is that it parallels a similar, simplistic, mindset among the fanbase that "we rebuilt the program once before so we can just rebuild again." (Typified by the mantra that "all we have to do is bring back the Friends of UNH Hockey and everything will magically return to normal.") Maybe so, but I have serious doubts/concerns. Given the landscape of the world we live in, (more interested in participation than success) college sports in general (the portal, NIL, etc.) and the college hockey universe I just wonder if the UNH Hockey program can return to anything close to the national prominence it once enjoyed. Drawing false equivalencies is, quite honestly lazy, and merely masks the larger issues at hand.

Then again, I am responding to someone who recently compared David Fessenden to Ty Conklin.
 
Last edited:
That's a fair take to a point, Felgie ... but aren't we pretty much saying the same thing? With my " ... and then some" being aimed at how Umile stayed WAY too long, as opposed to Holt staying around a little too long? Your description of the quick downward turn during the last few years of the Holt Era, and his relatively quick decision to step down ... that all happened, and Umile could (and should) have used that as a cautionary tale for himself to learn from. My point has always been that Umile didn't learn. There was/is no intention on my part to disparage the Holt legacy, anything but.

A few posts ago, 'Watcher commented about how he accepts coaches "staying too long" most of the time as part of the overall package with a successful coach. I pretty much agree with his take on it. From a common sense standpoint, a coach that has enjoyed success regularly will usually overestimate his ability to maintain or recapture that success, and if there's a downturn, most likely will soldier on for a couple of years to give himself an opportunity to prove himself "wrong". I think that's what Coach Holt (and many others, before and since) ended up doing, and when the program continued to (rapidly) drop, he made the tough decision to call it a day. No shame in that, it happens to even the best, "we're only immortal for a limited time".

Coach Umile's arc was different, as you pointed out, and I do agree with you on that. Umile's decline was more like the example of a lobster being dropped into a kettle of lukewarm water, thinking everything was OK, since the last year was just about the same as the one before it, with maybe some gradual slippage over time ... just as the lobster doesn't recognize a slight increase in the water temp as the kettle is gradually brought up to a boil. Of course, there is a point where the lobster figures out (too late!) that he's not getting out of the kettle alive, and even for Coach Umile's slow and gradual descent over the decade or so after his last trip to the FF, he had plenty of time to self-assess and realize he wasn't getting back to the FF.

Yet he ignored the example of Coach Holt stepping away with dignity, persisted in his folly for whatever personal reasons he had, and now his legacy is tarnished with posts like so many on here over the last several years, pointing at his stubbornness as the reason why his alma mater's hockey program is stuck in a ditch for the foreseeable future.

Furthermore, Coach Holt stepping down allowed new blood to return the program to his past glories much more quickly, while Coach Umile's approach (selfish or narcissistic - you choose) only made his successor's job more difficult. If said successor is without a plan and/or a dynamic recruiting-friendly personality, well then, the task gets even more challenging, doesn't it?

Just to be clear, Coach Umile had most of it over Coach Holt when it comes to the measurables (i.e wins, titles, trophies and close calls with the NC at the FF). But Coach Holt had it by a country mile over Coach Umile when it came to the intangibles, which was ultimately acting in the long-term interests of a successful D-1 hockey program in Durham.

Hope that clarifies things to your liking, Felgie ...
 
That's a fair take to a point, Felgie ... but aren't we pretty much saying the same thing? With my " ... and then some" being aimed at how Umile stayed WAY too long, as opposed to Holt staying around a little too long? Your description of the quick downward turn during the last few years of the Holt Era, and his relatively quick decision to step down ... that all happened, and Umile could (and should) have used that as a cautionary tale for himself to learn from. My point has always been that Umile didn't learn. There was/is no intention on my part to disparage the Holt legacy, anything but.

A few posts ago, 'Watcher commented about how he accepts coaches "staying too long" most of the time as part of the overall package with a successful coach. I pretty much agree with his take on it. From a common sense standpoint, a coach that has enjoyed success regularly will usually overestimate his ability to maintain or recapture that success, and if there's a downturn, most likely will soldier on for a couple of years to give himself an opportunity to prove himself "wrong". I think that's what Coach Holt (and many others, before and since) ended up doing, and when the program continued to (rapidly) drop, he made the tough decision to call it a day. No shame in that, it happens to even the best, "we're only immortal for a limited time".

Coach Umile's arc was different, as you pointed out, and I do agree with you on that. Umile's decline was more like the example of a lobster being dropped into a kettle of lukewarm water, thinking everything was OK, since the last year was just about the same as the one before it, with maybe some gradual slippage over time ... just as the lobster doesn't recognize a slight increase in the water temp as the kettle is gradually brought up to a boil. Of course, there is a point where the lobster figures out (too late!) that he's not getting out of the kettle alive, and even for Coach Umile's slow and gradual descent over the decade or so after his last trip to the FF, he had plenty of time to self-assess and realize he wasn't getting back to the FF.

Yet he ignored the example of Coach Holt stepping away with dignity, persisted in his folly for whatever personal reasons he had, and now his legacy is tarnished with posts like so many on here over the last several years, pointing at his stubbornness as the reason why his alma mater's hockey program is stuck in a ditch for the foreseeable future.

Furthermore, Coach Holt stepping down allowed new blood to return the program to his past glories much more quickly, while Coach Umile's approach (selfish or narcissistic - you choose) only made his successor's job more difficult. If said successor is without a plan and/or a dynamic recruiting-friendly personality, well then, the task gets even more challenging, doesn't it?

Just to be clear, Coach Umile had most of it over Coach Holt when it comes to the measurables (i.e wins, titles, trophies and close calls with the NC at the FF). But Coach Holt had it by a country mile over Coach Umile when it came to the intangibles, which was ultimately acting in the long-term interests of a successful D-1 hockey program in Durham.

Hope that clarifies things to your liking, Felgie ...

We're pretty much on the same page Chuck. I was particularly drawn to your take about the women's soccer HC being a potential casualty of the change in ADs given the PC world we live in...speaks to what I was referring to as the larger more real world problems potentially facing the hockey program now.

What has struck me over the past few years has been how more and more removed we are from any positive developments in the program. The Whittemore Center opened less than a decade after Coach Holt retired. I believe they have now played in the Whitt almost as long as they did in Snively, and there is no new facility on the horizon to jump start things.

Also I can remember driving home from Albany in 1998 after they finally got over the hump and returned to the Frozen Four, thinking about how it had been 16 years since getting there. We are now 19 years removed from Buffalo and its not like they have been knocking on the door the past decade.
 
Last edited:
To paraphrase another coach whose college tenures didnt usually end in the best light, but he ALWAYS sold the school to talent and DELIVERED results while he was there, - "Larry Bird aint walking thru that door!" At UNH, could substitute Krog, Haydar, Cox, etc in this phrase. Heck, at this point in the "rebuild", most fans would easily settle for a Tom Nolan or Steve Saviano walking thru the door.
 
Last edited:
To paraphrase another coach whose college tenures didnt usually end in the best light, but he ALWAYS sold the school to talent and DELIVERED results while he was there, - "Larry Bird aint walking thru that door!" At UNH, could substitute Krog, Haydar, Cox, etc in this phrase. Heck, at this point in the "rebuild", most fans would easily settle for a Tom Nolan or Steve Saviano walking thru the door.

It never ceases to blow my mind how Saviano was seen as a recruiting afterthought at the time, basically almost as a bonus meant to ensure his Reading HS teammate Sean Collins would follow in his footsteps. An absolute diamond in the rough, in the right place at the right time ... and that's what happens with a winning program. Winning begets winning, just as losing begets losing. And mediocrity usually begets more mediocrity, but more often, it also devolves into a losing pattern as well.

Saviano just turned 40 a few months ago. I have no idea what he's doing, now that he's finally hung up the skates after a long pro career across Europe. I'm struck by the fact that while he was a fierce two-way competitor, he never racked up more than the 18 PIM's he accrued in his junior season at UNH - including all of those pro seasons that followed. An overachiever, and a total class act on and off the ice ... if he had interest in taking one of the assistant jobs at UNH (including volunteer assistant) I'd give him an opportunity in a heartbeat. His story, and his character, would speak volumes to me ...

Postscript - Saviano is working locally in the mortgage/finance field post-retirement
 
Last edited:
Welp, there goes my Friday night:

Breaking: UNH’s Men’s Hockey game against St. Lawrence this Friday the 7th in Durham has been canceled and will not be made up. St. Lawrence is also canceling their game against Merrimack the following night. #betheroar @TNHSports1911 @UNHMHOCKEY
 
Welp, there goes my Friday night:
Breaking: UNH's Men's Hockey game against St. Lawrence this Friday the 7th in Durham has been canceled and will not be made up. St. Lawrence is also canceling their game against Merrimack the following night. #betheroar @TNHSports1911 @UNHMHOCKEY

Seems like SLU has a "problem" here. Why not UNH v. Merrimack to keep both teams active?

Meanwhile, 'Bama and Georgia will be meeting on Monday night at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis in front of 70,000+ friends and family. Wonder if the roof and/or window will be left open??
 
Seems like SLU has a "problem" here. Why not UNH v. Merrimack to keep both teams active?

Meanwhile, 'Bama and Georgia will be meeting on Monday night at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis in front of 70,000+ friends and family. Wonder if the roof and/or window will be left open??

Merrimack and Clarkson are (supposedly) playing Friday while UNH and Clarkson are (supposedly) playing Saturday.
 
Seems like SLU has a "problem" here. Why not UNH v. Merrimack to keep both teams active?

Meanwhile, 'Bama and Georgia will be meeting on Monday night at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis in front of 70,000+ friends and family. Wonder if the roof and/or window will be left open??

As my Alabama-born-and-bred wife and in-laws (all Auburn grads, by the way) will tell you - if this is the LAST thing these 70,000 people do before they get attached to a vent and then ultimately detached and rolled into a casket, most of them are pretty much perfectly fine with that. If they check out on the heels of a win, even better!! SEC mindset!!! ;-)
 
Wildcatdc, you are so right about the SEC mindset. What I was surprised about n your post was that you didn’t add, was the fact that your family of War Eagles fans would be extra happy about is that at least half of those would be @*$#& Bama fans! Correct? And Satan would finally be gone!
 
I half heartedly expect Clarkson to cancel very soon as well. That’s what I’ve heard being rumored. But don’t take my word for it.
 
So let's pkay Dartmouth at our house...I wanna rematch. Delta B told me their weekend was lost due to covid with RPI players...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top