What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UNH Wildcats 2021/2022 - Return of the Champions of October?

Status
Not open for further replies.
So y'all think of the UNH Men's Hockey team as "them"?

Don't be so sensitive, Marty. ;-)

FWIW I've never used the term "us" in connection with a sports team unless I was part of that team. Player, coach, whatever ... can't even say I've used "us" for one of our kids' teams, unless I was coaching it. In my mind, there's a sanctity with being part of a team. Can't speak for 'Watcher, but as far as I'm concerned, it's OK to use "us" if you feel that strongly about it. So long as you don't mind being seen by some (i.e. me) as a yahoo homer, and I get to chide you mercilessly as such. :-D

You make it sound like using the word "them" designates an enemy. That I do find curious ... is this one of them fandangled pronoun thingies the lefties and kids ramble on about these days?!?

P.S. - just in case you ARE Blue Skies ... yes, it's your program, you get to use "us" ...
 
The only spoiler alert I will give is the Miami-Michigan FH game did NOT reach OT ...

It was a great game and the Red Hawks did all they could do being out shot, out cornered (FH term) etc. nothing to be ashamed of. MI was runner up last year so they are hungry. OH...and guess who's FH team was runner up in D1 in 1986? Game was played at OD. Year before the lady laxers won the D1 title. Is this the year Durham gets a NC for a men's team... (smiley face)
[TABLE="border: 1, cellpadding: 1, cellspacing: 1"]
[TR]
[TD]1986[/TD]
[TD]Iowa (19-2-1)[/TD]
[TD]Judith Davidson[/TD]
[TD]2-1 (2 ot)[/TD]
[TD]New Hampshire[/TD]
[TD]Old Dominion
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
See my post for the thrilling end of the game recap!

Just saw your updated post. Having seen the ending live, I looks like FH is another sport that's been screwed up by video replay. Nothing ruins the spontaneity of sports by taking long breaks in play to watch video for marginal "infractions", no matter what the sport. I don't know the rules (other than the "it can't touch your foot" thing) so I'll just leave it at that. Tough ending.

TGIF & GO UNH Men's Soccer!!!
 
FWIW dept...Dan's Red Hawks (#25) are leading (#3) Michigan 2-1 in FIELD hockey...will there be a huge upset today??? Of course ALL eyes are on Durham this weekend for the game of the century between the UNH Wildcats and UVM Catamounts. Ice hockey is also on tap for these two teams this weekend... :) (wink) UPDATE: Red Hawks continue to stave off the Wolverines heading into the 4th qtr still up 2-1. If the Red Hawks win it's a freaking massive upset in field hockey land!

Final update: Michigan finally breaks through to tie, and win, in the last 2 mins of the game. Controversial penalty corner at the end led to GWG for MI. (reviewed) Yep, good teams find a way to win but, it was oh so close for Dan's Red Hawks!

Ouch, so that's what it feels like to blow a 2-0 lead in an NCAA Field Hockey game! I already spoke with Fishman81 and he is adamant that Miami would have won had they played this game in Oxford!

Michigan in fact scored TWICE in the final 1:01 to come from behind and advance! That makes TWO one-goal losses to Michigan this season for Miami (the first coming in a pre-season exhibition). Miami is pretty good, #25 ranking aside. Undoubtedly, Maine would have been smoked.

I have not seen the replay of the final goal yet (scored with 0:02 on the clock), and I'm not sure I would know what I was reviewing even if I did see the replay. So, tell me Ref, what are your opinions on the goal? Did the NCAA screw Miami in the name of $$$ (seeing as how games are being played in Ann Arbor all the way through the NCAA Championship game)...?? Should I head over to the Maine thread to express my outrage?!

Okay - I've seen it and still have no idea? What was the controversy? That shot was ripped! I'm more confused about the call that drew the corner, can you explain? Seemed like innocuous defense and a soft call with two seconds left? And what is the referee implying when he rubs his arm to explain the call? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Ouch, so that's what it feels like to blow a 2-0 lead in an NCAA Field Hockey game! I already spoke with Fishman81 and he is adamant that Miami would have won had they played this game in Oxford!

Michigan in fact scored TWICE in the final 1:01 to come from behind and advance! That makes TWO one-goal losses to Michigan this season for Miami (the first coming in a pre-season exhibition). Miami is pretty good, #25 ranking aside. Undoubtedly, Maine would have been smoked.

I have not seen the replay of the final goal yet (scored with 0:02 on the clock), and I'm not sure I would know what I was reviewing even if I did see the replay. So, tell me Ref, what are your opinions on the goal? Did the NCAA screw Miami in the name of $$$ (seeing as how games are being played in Ann Arbor all the way through the NCAA Championship game)...?? Should I head over to the Maine thread to express my outrage?!

Okay - I've seen it and still have no idea? What was the controversy? That shot was ripped! I'm more confused about the call that drew the corner, can you explain? Seemed like innocuous defense and a soft call with two seconds left? And what is the referee implying when he rubs his arm to explain the call? Thanks.

Well, I played it back a few times; I honestly am not sure what the controversy was. Things happen pretty darn fast out there (esp at this level) and they (officials) are miked up. The GWG looked totally legit. I'd have to say the call that led to the corner? Have played it back a few times. Looks like the official is signalling "wrong side of stick" foul...which the Miami players didn't agree with as they showed him how she played it. (and I'd have to say, it looked like the defender played it legally but mind you I am not down there at that level soooo...) I should have kept the volume on so that I could hear the Miami coach as no one was really calling the game (and you could hear his commentary which led me to mute it) If you find out I'd love to know myself!! It was obviously reviewed so that call stands.

I guess when you have the right to review you might as well use it as the Red Hawk coaching staff did. And Chuck to my knowledge it's only in the level of this play (tournament) that reviews are used. (also in the Olympic games). Michigan is lucky today. Despite dominating most of the game (I did miss the first qtr because I forgot it was on) they found a way to win it.
 
Last edited:

Awesome huh! That's what I love about this game. Anyhoo, if you are interested in the end of it Dan, click here and watch the ensuing play which leads to the corner/ GWG. Once the ball finally gets into the striking circle the corner is called and that 'wrong side of stick' signal is given. You can verify that's the call because the Miami player comes over and shows the official what side was used kind of thing. Anyhoo, that is what I believe was the call. Wonder what could have happened if they went to OT? Didn't see enough of Miami's attack to know as I missed their two goals and they didn't get much circle time the rest of the game. But here's what's cool even in their loss; they gained another year of NCAA D1 credibility, and as you say, played very competitively against a ranked opponent (MI). I'll pay attention to the Red Hawks next season....

Michigan wins it
 
Don't be so sensitive, Marty. ;-)

FWIW I've never used the term "us" in connection with a sports team unless I was part of that team. Player, coach, whatever ... can't even say I've used "us" for one of our kids' teams, unless I was coaching it. In my mind, there's a sanctity with being part of a team. Can't speak for 'Watcher, but as far as I'm concerned, it's OK to use "us" if you feel that strongly about it. So long as you don't mind being seen by some (i.e. me) as a yahoo homer, and I get to chide you mercilessly as such. :-D

You make it sound like using the word "them" designates an enemy. That I do find curious ... is this one of them fandangled pronoun thingies the lefties and kids ramble on about these days?!?

P.S. - just in case you ARE Blue Skies ... yes, it's your program, you get to use "us" ...
Us = Red Sox, them = Yankees, no? It does explain why I've yet to receive any of my World Series rings though.

I may or may not be Marty. Regardless, we are all in this together. Go (Wild)'cats!
 
I was only suggesting that for us, its not so important: the sun will rise, the sun will set, and I'll have lunch.
For some it should be crucial.
 
Fish got called back for a possible encore?

NESN TV crew says that Souza scored a great goal once upon a time, is a great coach, and has brought a hockey culture back to UNH.
 
Last edited:
Points are points...broke our PP drought. Nice penalty shot thanks goodness. Thought Fessenden was decent. But overall yucky UNH v UVM game. Need more offense.
 
Points are points...broke our PP drought. Nice penalty shot thanks goodness. Thought Fessenden was decent. But overall yucky UNH v UVM game. Need more offense.

It was a fun game to watch on TV for me, although I ageee neither team can score goals, and not because the goalies are any good. Three OT games in HEA last night, with little goal scoring in all but one, with Maine getting their first win. Had Merrimack won that game, I would have suggested that the Sons of Scotty Borek were well on their way to separating themselves from the three struggling northern New England state schools. Instead, just maybe there is a slight chance for “us” (UNH) to climb up to eighth place this season and face the #1 for a chance to revisit the Garden for the first time in ___ years (quiz question)?
 
Last edited:
It was a fun game to watch on TV for me, although I ageee neither team can score goals, and not because the goalies are any good. Three OT games in HEA last night, with little goal scoring in all but one, with Maine getting their first win. Had Merrimack won that game, I would have suggested that the Sons of Scotty Borek were well on their way to separating themselves from the three struggling northern New England state schools. Instead, just maybe there is a slight chance for “us” (UNH) to climb up to eighth place this season and face the #1 for a chance to revisit the Garden for the first time in ___ years (quiz question)?

The last time the 'Cats were at the Garden was in 2015 v BU. We got there by defeating PC in OT on a goal by Jay Camper. And the rest is history for PC after that as we well know. That would be an amazing feat to get there. Yeah I mean last night's game seemed like alot of other games between these two teams. Too bad Will Margel's goal didn't count it was a nice one. I'm thinking it gets a bit chippy tonight and I'd like to see us take fewer penalties and shoot the puck please! I'd like to think we can win but still thinking a 2-2 tie-Robinson in net? Go 'Cats!
 
Last edited:
Okay - I've seen it and still have no idea? What was the controversy? That shot was ripped! I'm more confused about the call that drew the corner, can you explain? Seemed like innocuous defense and a soft call with two seconds left? And what is the referee implying when he rubs his arm to explain the call? Thanks.

Don't understand any of it either, what is this "wrong side of the stick" infraction, 'Ref?

The "arm rub" thing was the ref's signal to "hurry up, my bus ride outta town is leaving shortly" ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top