walrus
Wind up workin' in a gas station
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
We need chris!!! back
We need chris!!! back
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
- Thread starter Chuck Murray
- Start date
- Status
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
I heard that driving to work yesterday on Sirius/XM ... "Flash" Phelps who does "60s on 6" was telling anecdotes...he sounded like one of the real good guys...
Terrific stuff on the CHDA (College Hockey Dark Ages), which seems more like the Age of Enlightenment in retrospect, given recent trends and sterilization of the D-1 hockey world. But as those of you who've been on here a long time, you'll know there something that's right up there with UNH Hockey among my cherished sports-related pursuits and passions. And even if it's going on 14 years since they left Montreal, I still pay attention, I suppose, because it's one of those things I'm still hoping to see again. Even if these things go under the radar, but here it is.
"The Grand Finale" has also sadly arrived for Le Grand Orange, #10 right fielder Rusty Staub of Les Expos ...
http://montrealgazette.com/sports/baseball/former-expo-rusty-staub-has-died-at-73-reports
There's some terrific video footage embedded in Cowan's tribute article of Staub and the early days of MLB in Montreal. Coming on the heels of another successful cameo for the looming rebirth of MLB in Montreal, and hours before the start of a new baseball season, this made for a poignant last 48 hours at the WIS Estate, where both the US and Canadian flags are flying at half-mast this week. RIP Rusty.
I heard that driving to work yesterday on Sirius/XM ... "Flash" Phelps who does "60s on 6" was telling anecdotes...he sounded like one of the real good guys...
Speaking of FBI, could be Full Blooded Italian, Full Blooded Iranian, Full Blooded Icelander, Full Blooded Illinoian, Full Blooded Iroquois. My wife is FBI, Full Blooded Irish
You left out Full Blooded Inuit, and there is/was one in the NHL.
EDIT: Jordin Tootoo, from Churchill, has played in over 700 games and racked up over 1000 penalty minutes, mostly with Predators, and most recently with Black Hawks.
Last edited:
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
There is an excerpt by the author Tim Rappleye dated 6 December 2017 on CHN that describes Dave Silk taking his stick to a frat guy hanging over the glass at Thompson Arena who spit on him. Apparently this game occurred around the same time that a crew was on campus filming for the movie 'Animal House.'
There is an excerpt by the author Tim Rappleye dated 6 December 2017 on CHN that describes Dave Silk taking his stick to a frat guy hanging over the glass at Thompson Arena who spit on him. Apparently this game occurred around the same time that a crew was on campus filming for the movie 'Animal House.'
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
A few incidents with New Haven as well. He enjoyed the hockey life.
A few incidents with New Haven as well. He enjoyed the hockey life.
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
Yes, both true. I am 80% through the book...can't put it down.
Yes, both true. I am 80% through the book...can't put it down.
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
Following up on Chuck's reference to the College Hockey Dark Ages....
Wiseguys is of course about the 1978 Terriers. The passage chickod posted earlier really hit home with me. Because as we all know UNH won the ECAC title the following season. I can still remember, all these years later, driving home from Boston with a bunch of my pals, and thinking to myself that it was in some ways the end of an era. Not because UNH had won, but because the league would never be the same again for a couple of reasons. The following season the ECAC would be split into three divisions (East, West Ivy.) Standardized schedules would replace the haphazard ones, which would lead to a waning of some rivalries. A new program, the University of Maine, was joining the league. And as now seems inevitable, in less than five years there would be a move to create a so-called Super League, which would ultimately be refined to Hockey East.
And that '79 Championship Game was the last played without facemasks. Again, a move towards safety that was inevitable but came with growing pains. While the eastern teams had facemasks the western ones didn't. When UNH met Ohio State to open the 79-80 season, the first game quickly degenerated into a melee and UNH ultimately forfeited both games.
Perhaps the only time in my life I ever had a really prescient thought. Not saying those days were better or worse, just different.
Following up on Chuck's reference to the College Hockey Dark Ages....
Wiseguys is of course about the 1978 Terriers. The passage chickod posted earlier really hit home with me. Because as we all know UNH won the ECAC title the following season. I can still remember, all these years later, driving home from Boston with a bunch of my pals, and thinking to myself that it was in some ways the end of an era. Not because UNH had won, but because the league would never be the same again for a couple of reasons. The following season the ECAC would be split into three divisions (East, West Ivy.) Standardized schedules would replace the haphazard ones, which would lead to a waning of some rivalries. A new program, the University of Maine, was joining the league. And as now seems inevitable, in less than five years there would be a move to create a so-called Super League, which would ultimately be refined to Hockey East.
And that '79 Championship Game was the last played without facemasks. Again, a move towards safety that was inevitable but came with growing pains. While the eastern teams had facemasks the western ones didn't. When UNH met Ohio State to open the 79-80 season, the first game quickly degenerated into a melee and UNH ultimately forfeited both games.
Perhaps the only time in my life I ever had a really prescient thought. Not saying those days were better or worse, just different.
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
Agreed. The one certainly in life is that there will always be change. Whether or not we always want to call it "progress" would require a 10 year discussion...for me, I am thankful for the wonderful memories and I'll leave it at that.
(finished the book - I have never read an entire book in one day in my life - unless it was one of those short "novella" things)
Agreed. The one certainly in life is that there will always be change. Whether or not we always want to call it "progress" would require a 10 year discussion...for me, I am thankful for the wonderful memories and I'll leave it at that.
(finished the book - I have never read an entire book in one day in my life - unless it was one of those short "novella" things)
HockeyRef
Well-known member
Agreed. The one certainly in life is that there will always be change. Whether or not we always want to call it "progress" would require a 10 year discussion...for me, I am thankful for the wonderful memories and I'll leave it at that.
(finished the book - I have never read an entire book in one day in my life - unless it was one of those short "novella" things)
Kind of hoping the phrase "the more things change the more they stay the same" doesn't hold true for the future of UNH hockey
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
I think we left before the second game, because we were so bummed out after losing to Dartmouth, 1-0. We hit the crossbar in the opening minutes and then they completely shut us down. There is a slight mention of that in the book, how Dartmouth's coach "borrowed" the tactic that Tim Taylor of Yale successfully used when they stopped our winning streak the previous year. It was actually the forerunner of what would now be known as the "center ice trap."
The changes have made the game more technical and "scientific." Personally, I preferred the more "free wheeling" style that was used in the old days. The book alludes to that also (I don't remember the exact quote, but something to the effect that Charlie Holt's philosophy was a constant wave of offense and winning by outscoring the opponent as opposed to playing defense). Many of the BU/UNH games were wild, high-scoring affairs. The gigantic goalies, combined with the pads, have really shunted offenses today. I don't know, there's something wrong when you have to "struggle" to score goals. I think it takes a lot of the excitement away. In some aspects hockey has become like soccer, and it's not meant to be. It's played in a more confined area, and the beauty of the game (the speed and skill) has been somewhat negated by the equipment. I don't believe the composite sticks compensate for the miniscule area the players have to shoot at these days. Watch any highlights...when's the last time you saw ANY goalie "stack the pads" and make an acrobatic save. They would have to "go down" all the time and that required agility and athleticism because you couldn't just stand there and cover almost the entire net. Not saying every game should be 8-7, but I just preferred a "little" more scoring. It really showcased the skill of these players.
If you want to laugh, the last page of the book, after the Epilogue, shows the stat sheet for that season. BU scored an insane 199 goals. In today's era, 100 goals is a good season. This year in Hockey East:
[table="width: 200, class: outer_border, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Team[/td]
[td]Goals[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Northeastern[/td]
[td]136[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]BU[/td]
[td]124[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Providence[/td]
[td]117[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Maine[/td]
[td]117[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]BC[/td]
[td]108[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]UMass - Amherst[/td]
[td]104[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]UMass - Lowell[/td]
[td]101[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]UConn[/td]
[td]100[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]UNH[/td]
[td]88[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Merrimack[/td]
[td]83[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Vermont[/td]
[td]79[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
I think we left before the second game, because we were so bummed out after losing to Dartmouth, 1-0. We hit the crossbar in the opening minutes and then they completely shut us down. There is a slight mention of that in the book, how Dartmouth's coach "borrowed" the tactic that Tim Taylor of Yale successfully used when they stopped our winning streak the previous year. It was actually the forerunner of what would now be known as the "center ice trap."
The changes have made the game more technical and "scientific." Personally, I preferred the more "free wheeling" style that was used in the old days. The book alludes to that also (I don't remember the exact quote, but something to the effect that Charlie Holt's philosophy was a constant wave of offense and winning by outscoring the opponent as opposed to playing defense). Many of the BU/UNH games were wild, high-scoring affairs. The gigantic goalies, combined with the pads, have really shunted offenses today. I don't know, there's something wrong when you have to "struggle" to score goals. I think it takes a lot of the excitement away. In some aspects hockey has become like soccer, and it's not meant to be. It's played in a more confined area, and the beauty of the game (the speed and skill) has been somewhat negated by the equipment. I don't believe the composite sticks compensate for the miniscule area the players have to shoot at these days. Watch any highlights...when's the last time you saw ANY goalie "stack the pads" and make an acrobatic save. They would have to "go down" all the time and that required agility and athleticism because you couldn't just stand there and cover almost the entire net. Not saying every game should be 8-7, but I just preferred a "little" more scoring. It really showcased the skill of these players.
If you want to laugh, the last page of the book, after the Epilogue, shows the stat sheet for that season. BU scored an insane 199 goals. In today's era, 100 goals is a good season. This year in Hockey East:
[table="width: 200, class: outer_border, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Team[/td]
[td]Goals[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Northeastern[/td]
[td]136[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]BU[/td]
[td]124[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Providence[/td]
[td]117[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Maine[/td]
[td]117[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]BC[/td]
[td]108[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]UMass - Amherst[/td]
[td]104[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]UMass - Lowell[/td]
[td]101[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]UConn[/td]
[td]100[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]UNH[/td]
[td]88[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Merrimack[/td]
[td]83[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Vermont[/td]
[td]79[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
Last edited:
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
All you have to do is remember the 1977 ECAC semis and finals at the Garden. 55 goals in four games. Insane. But I don't think I ever sat through a more exciting weekend of hockey, even given how it turned out.
FWIW, Charlie Holt's '77 UNH squad (which was loaded) scored 245 goals...of course they also gave up 181...
All you have to do is remember the 1977 ECAC semis and finals at the Garden. 55 goals in four games. Insane. But I don't think I ever sat through a more exciting weekend of hockey, even given how it turned out.
FWIW, Charlie Holt's '77 UNH squad (which was loaded) scored 245 goals...of course they also gave up 181...
Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
Putting aside the "hockey has become more like soccer" thing - as someone who has enjoyed both, and continues to play and coach the latter, the similarities and differences of the two sports are pretty obvious - you have definitely touched upon an issue that I feel needs to be dealt with ASAP to make hockey an even better sport to play and (maybe more importantly) to enjoy watching. And that's the lack of athleticism in the goalie position as it is currently instructed in modern-day hockey. In short, while the game is played with the same size goals (4 ft. H x 6 ft. W) as it's been for probably over the last 100 years ... the goalies who stand in front of those goals, and the size of the equipment they use while doing it, has indisputably changed the way the goalie position is played. And frankly, not for the better.
The evolution is not difficult to track ... back in the old days, wooden sticks were mostly (if not entirely) flat-bladed, and the use of the slapshot was a rarity, and greatly frowned upon (all of us old-timers will recall former B's color analyst Johnny Pierson, who would moan almost on a nightly basis in the '70's and '80's about the evils of the inaccurate slapshot, and the virtues of the accurate wrist/snap shot). Enter Stan Mikita and Bobby Hull circa 1960 and the curved sticks, which would allow better elevation of shots - including slappers - that would terrorize mask-less goalies, who then over the next decade (led by Jacques Plante) adopted the protective mask, which gradually evolved into the cage and the mask/cage, to the current state of the art 50 years later. Not too long after the last mask-less goalies were retired or converted, came the evolution away from the wooden sticks to the composites that rule the landscape nowadays. No one has any real worries about goalie safety from head injuries now, so by extension, the safety problems of puck elevation have waned as well. Nevertheless, the non-mask protection offered to/used by modern-day goalies has expanded, and gotten better (i.e. much lighter) too. Overall, good things for goalies, not being weighed down by heavy, often water-logged equipment as their predecessors often were.
In the last generation, the evolution of the way the goalie position is played has become much less athletic, and much more a calculation of how best to cover the 24 square feet of space. The cynical answers are (1) get bigger goalies - with bigger equipment than offered to predecessors from the olden days; and (2) instruct them to sit back, fill space and play angles - mostly while already on their knees. You used to be able to tell most of the NHL goalies apart from each other, not because of what sweater they were wearing, but simply because so many of them played a different style. It's not like "big" goalies are entirely new - Ken Dryden was that guy almost 50 years ago - but there would be other guys like Gerry Cheevers, Rogie Vachon, Ed Giacomin, Gilles Meloche, Gilles Gilbert, and Tony Esposito (who might have been the prototype for a lot of the currently favored technique) who all played differently, and all played at a very high level.
Today's NHL is arguably the most athletic it's ever been ... with one blatantly obvious exception: the goalie position. Other than guys like Jonathan Quick and Henrik Lundqvist, it's hard to believe the Dominic Hasek era has passed so quickly, vanishing without a trace to some degree. Maybe Hasek was a one-off ... but should he have been? His was a uniquely athletic style that was hugely entertaining (and I say that as a fan and a former goalie) and the sport is worse off for its virtual absence. Goalies simply spend too much time pushing back and forth, from post to post on their knees. Is it effective? Apparently so. Is it athletic and/or entertaining to watch? Hardly.
As I've discussed and suggested in the past ... with all of the other changes around the sport over its hundred year evolution, the time has arrived to look at the size of the goal itself. And my proposed solution remains, lift the crossbar by a foot, implement it first in the ECHL or AHL, and see how it works with scoring, and (to me, more importantly) keeping goalies up on their skates more. Maybe at some point, the goals might need to be made wider too? But first, the crossbar. Giving shooters more space upstairs no longer creates an increased safety risk for the well-protected goalies (although it might force more defensemen to wear face shields?), and it might force them to play on their skates a little more often. Allow stick blades to have bigger curves too. If the cynical sliding back-and-forth thing has to do with shooters' inability at times to get elevation on their shots ... then let's give the shooters a little more help with that, no?
These are things that can easily be changed, without limiting the speed or size of the players, altering the footprints of the rinks, or silly - over-officious rule changes (P.S. - get rid of the trapezoid too - why penalize a goalie who can actually, y'know, skate like Marty Brodeur?) but just some well-overdue tweaks to make for a better game, and bring at least a little athleticism back to a position where it's been held back for the better part of this new century. At least initially, you don't even have to change the location of the post anchors. Simple, eh?
Those who want to criticize soccer (and I'm looking at you, chickod
), we can have that discussion later. We've got six months of off-season to kill, no reason to blow through all of the fun stuff right off the bat. 
Putting aside the "hockey has become more like soccer" thing - as someone who has enjoyed both, and continues to play and coach the latter, the similarities and differences of the two sports are pretty obvious - you have definitely touched upon an issue that I feel needs to be dealt with ASAP to make hockey an even better sport to play and (maybe more importantly) to enjoy watching. And that's the lack of athleticism in the goalie position as it is currently instructed in modern-day hockey. In short, while the game is played with the same size goals (4 ft. H x 6 ft. W) as it's been for probably over the last 100 years ... the goalies who stand in front of those goals, and the size of the equipment they use while doing it, has indisputably changed the way the goalie position is played. And frankly, not for the better.
The evolution is not difficult to track ... back in the old days, wooden sticks were mostly (if not entirely) flat-bladed, and the use of the slapshot was a rarity, and greatly frowned upon (all of us old-timers will recall former B's color analyst Johnny Pierson, who would moan almost on a nightly basis in the '70's and '80's about the evils of the inaccurate slapshot, and the virtues of the accurate wrist/snap shot). Enter Stan Mikita and Bobby Hull circa 1960 and the curved sticks, which would allow better elevation of shots - including slappers - that would terrorize mask-less goalies, who then over the next decade (led by Jacques Plante) adopted the protective mask, which gradually evolved into the cage and the mask/cage, to the current state of the art 50 years later. Not too long after the last mask-less goalies were retired or converted, came the evolution away from the wooden sticks to the composites that rule the landscape nowadays. No one has any real worries about goalie safety from head injuries now, so by extension, the safety problems of puck elevation have waned as well. Nevertheless, the non-mask protection offered to/used by modern-day goalies has expanded, and gotten better (i.e. much lighter) too. Overall, good things for goalies, not being weighed down by heavy, often water-logged equipment as their predecessors often were.
In the last generation, the evolution of the way the goalie position is played has become much less athletic, and much more a calculation of how best to cover the 24 square feet of space. The cynical answers are (1) get bigger goalies - with bigger equipment than offered to predecessors from the olden days; and (2) instruct them to sit back, fill space and play angles - mostly while already on their knees. You used to be able to tell most of the NHL goalies apart from each other, not because of what sweater they were wearing, but simply because so many of them played a different style. It's not like "big" goalies are entirely new - Ken Dryden was that guy almost 50 years ago - but there would be other guys like Gerry Cheevers, Rogie Vachon, Ed Giacomin, Gilles Meloche, Gilles Gilbert, and Tony Esposito (who might have been the prototype for a lot of the currently favored technique) who all played differently, and all played at a very high level.
Today's NHL is arguably the most athletic it's ever been ... with one blatantly obvious exception: the goalie position. Other than guys like Jonathan Quick and Henrik Lundqvist, it's hard to believe the Dominic Hasek era has passed so quickly, vanishing without a trace to some degree. Maybe Hasek was a one-off ... but should he have been? His was a uniquely athletic style that was hugely entertaining (and I say that as a fan and a former goalie) and the sport is worse off for its virtual absence. Goalies simply spend too much time pushing back and forth, from post to post on their knees. Is it effective? Apparently so. Is it athletic and/or entertaining to watch? Hardly.
As I've discussed and suggested in the past ... with all of the other changes around the sport over its hundred year evolution, the time has arrived to look at the size of the goal itself. And my proposed solution remains, lift the crossbar by a foot, implement it first in the ECHL or AHL, and see how it works with scoring, and (to me, more importantly) keeping goalies up on their skates more. Maybe at some point, the goals might need to be made wider too? But first, the crossbar. Giving shooters more space upstairs no longer creates an increased safety risk for the well-protected goalies (although it might force more defensemen to wear face shields?), and it might force them to play on their skates a little more often. Allow stick blades to have bigger curves too. If the cynical sliding back-and-forth thing has to do with shooters' inability at times to get elevation on their shots ... then let's give the shooters a little more help with that, no?
These are things that can easily be changed, without limiting the speed or size of the players, altering the footprints of the rinks, or silly - over-officious rule changes (P.S. - get rid of the trapezoid too - why penalize a goalie who can actually, y'know, skate like Marty Brodeur?) but just some well-overdue tweaks to make for a better game, and bring at least a little athleticism back to a position where it's been held back for the better part of this new century. At least initially, you don't even have to change the location of the post anchors. Simple, eh?
Those who want to criticize soccer (and I'm looking at you, chickod
), we can have that discussion later. We've got six months of off-season to kill, no reason to blow through all of the fun stuff right off the bat. 
. Gotcha back...I knew that would hit a nerve!
Last edited:
Greg Ambrose
Registered User
No, we were talking Buckton and Marzo. I remember because I mentioned to Stanfield the Green Line story. Don’t forget that Bertrand was Harkness’ hand picked successor. And this is before he took the job at Union.
Greg Ambrose
Registered User
Did BU play at Salem State as part of their recruiting of Dick Lamby? I shared a beer with Lamby at a Lynn watering hole once. He was utilizing his BU degree at the time by working construction. We shared a couple of UNH stories. Seemed like a good guy.
theprofromdover
The Original Dope Detector
Lambs told me he was playing in Either Finland or Sweden in early October when he got a call from Parker recruiting him. He thought it was for the following season but Parker informed him he had been enrolled already and was expected the following week. Lamby didn’t know I was a BC guy when he disclosed his on the golf course. He had an original Ping that pinged!
You’re really testing my memory now, but I believe they scheduled the game after they knew he would be enrolling. All I know is my friend who lived in Marblehead, which is right around the corner from Salem State, told me “You have to see you this guy,” so we went.
Kind of hoping the phrase "the more things change the more they stay the same" doesn't hold true for the future of UNH hockey
Good point. I second that emotion!
jeteye1717
New member
Re: UNH Wildcats 2017/2018 - Umile's Last Stand - The Grand Finale
The late '70s corresponded to my undergraduate years at UNH, and the end of the 1978 season cemented my abiding hatred (now mellowed into respectful loathing with the passage of time) of the Terriers. The thrilling (up to a point) conclusion to the 1977 ECAC season (beating Brown in ot at Snively, then Cornell in 2ot in the Garden, only to fall to BU in the Championship Game) surely meant Next Year we were gonna do it, right, finally win that elusive title. Yet as the 1978 ECAC season drew to a close, UNH found itself barely over 0.500 in league play, clinging to the 8th - and final - playoff spot, and on the road at #1 BU in the 1-game quarterfinal round. A carload of us made the drive down to Walter Brown Arena, and sat there in stunned disbelief as the 'Cats skated toe to toe with the mighty Terriers for much of the game, only to fall (this time in ot) once again to BU when it mattered most. What made it even worse was learning as we filed out in sad despair that it had been a monumental night of upsets in the ECAC, with #2 Cornell, #3 Clarkson and #4 RPI all losing at home that same Black Tuesday night, thus paving the way for BU to waltz through the lower seeds at the Garden on the way to another ECAC title.
But, BUT ... no, Providence rolls over BU in its ECAC semi-final, and suddenly the nation's #1-ranked team was looking awfully vulnerable. We all smugly basked in BU's fall, knowing that despite their gaudy record (30+ wins at that point) they'd be golfing just like UNH soon enough. But, BUT ... no, the Terriers smoke Brown in the ECAC consolation game, and in reward the NCAA pooh-bahs grant Jack and Co. an unprecedented do-over vs. Providence @ Providence to determine who'd join BC (the ECAC Tournament Champion) in the NCAAs. Suddenly we weren't so much smug as outraged! Perhaps Sean can confirm the explanation I heard sometime in the following few years that Parker's wife had been quite ill, and understandably his full attention was elsewhere. The NCAA was sympathetic to these 'extenuating circumstances' and viola - the one off, never to be repeated play-in game was born. (To be fair, I know that CC played at BGSU in a corresponding 'West' play-in game that year, but was this planned from the start, or just an ad hoc response to the BU situation? Sean?).
You know the rest. BU beats PC in its play-in game, then Wisconsin and BC at the Providence Civic Center to win the 1978 National Championship. Barely 0.500, #8 UNH was an ot goal away from derailing the BU train at the station, but couldn't get the job done. I was heart-broken for my 'Cats; ****ed beyond reason at the special treatment afforded Parker and BU. UNH's first ECAC title the next season (#17 at 17:17 and all that) took some of the sting away, but there's a black spot in my heart still reserved for all things BU. Twenty years later as I'm happily bouncing around in Albany as M. Mowers beats Drury et al. with an ot shorty, the first thing that comes to mind is "This one's for you, Charlie," some cosmic retribution for 1977, 1978, 1984 (the 'mini-game' debacle) and all the other wrenching losses to BU over the decades. I've ordered up a copy of Wiseguys for a trip down Memory Lane; something tells me BU's Title Trek won't be presented with quite the same bile as *I* remember it ...
The late '70s corresponded to my undergraduate years at UNH, and the end of the 1978 season cemented my abiding hatred (now mellowed into respectful loathing with the passage of time) of the Terriers. The thrilling (up to a point) conclusion to the 1977 ECAC season (beating Brown in ot at Snively, then Cornell in 2ot in the Garden, only to fall to BU in the Championship Game) surely meant Next Year we were gonna do it, right, finally win that elusive title. Yet as the 1978 ECAC season drew to a close, UNH found itself barely over 0.500 in league play, clinging to the 8th - and final - playoff spot, and on the road at #1 BU in the 1-game quarterfinal round. A carload of us made the drive down to Walter Brown Arena, and sat there in stunned disbelief as the 'Cats skated toe to toe with the mighty Terriers for much of the game, only to fall (this time in ot) once again to BU when it mattered most. What made it even worse was learning as we filed out in sad despair that it had been a monumental night of upsets in the ECAC, with #2 Cornell, #3 Clarkson and #4 RPI all losing at home that same Black Tuesday night, thus paving the way for BU to waltz through the lower seeds at the Garden on the way to another ECAC title.
But, BUT ... no, Providence rolls over BU in its ECAC semi-final, and suddenly the nation's #1-ranked team was looking awfully vulnerable. We all smugly basked in BU's fall, knowing that despite their gaudy record (30+ wins at that point) they'd be golfing just like UNH soon enough. But, BUT ... no, the Terriers smoke Brown in the ECAC consolation game, and in reward the NCAA pooh-bahs grant Jack and Co. an unprecedented do-over vs. Providence @ Providence to determine who'd join BC (the ECAC Tournament Champion) in the NCAAs. Suddenly we weren't so much smug as outraged! Perhaps Sean can confirm the explanation I heard sometime in the following few years that Parker's wife had been quite ill, and understandably his full attention was elsewhere. The NCAA was sympathetic to these 'extenuating circumstances' and viola - the one off, never to be repeated play-in game was born. (To be fair, I know that CC played at BGSU in a corresponding 'West' play-in game that year, but was this planned from the start, or just an ad hoc response to the BU situation? Sean?).
You know the rest. BU beats PC in its play-in game, then Wisconsin and BC at the Providence Civic Center to win the 1978 National Championship. Barely 0.500, #8 UNH was an ot goal away from derailing the BU train at the station, but couldn't get the job done. I was heart-broken for my 'Cats; ****ed beyond reason at the special treatment afforded Parker and BU. UNH's first ECAC title the next season (#17 at 17:17 and all that) took some of the sting away, but there's a black spot in my heart still reserved for all things BU. Twenty years later as I'm happily bouncing around in Albany as M. Mowers beats Drury et al. with an ot shorty, the first thing that comes to mind is "This one's for you, Charlie," some cosmic retribution for 1977, 1978, 1984 (the 'mini-game' debacle) and all the other wrenching losses to BU over the decades. I've ordered up a copy of Wiseguys for a trip down Memory Lane; something tells me BU's Title Trek won't be presented with quite the same bile as *I* remember it ...
- Status