Re: UNH Wildcats 2013-14 Season Thread
So I know there's been some talk about the lack of finishers on the team and it got me thinking. And maybe you guys have already discussed this before but do you know that UNH does not have a drafted forward on their team? The previous two seasons it was only Greg Burke, who didn't play much last year b/c of an injury. I was kind of surprised by that so I did some digging (and let me know if I'm wrong but I think it's accurate) and I had to go back to the 1979-80 team to find another instance where UNH did not have a forward on the team who was drafted. Although after that season 2 current players got drafted (Brickley & Jay Miller). Now I understand having drafted players isn't the be all, end all and it's really not a big deal UNH doesn't have one this year(At least it shouldn't necessarily be). And I'm not trying to make a huge deal/ complain about the simple fact that there aren't any drafted forwards but it does kind of speak to the teams that have been put out recently. Now being drafted doesn't always mean the player will work out in college. Just consider Greg Burke who only put up 24 points in his first 3 years. And there are also great college players who never even get drafted (Krog is a big one that comes to mind. Why wasn't he drafted?? Nuts.). I get that. And you can still have a good team without draft picks (Ferris St.: 0 total & Union: 0 forwards). Now on the other spectrum draftees don't guarantee success (CC: 5, BU: 7, Harvard: 8). But it definitely helps. If you look at that top level of competition in college hockey (BC, Mich., Minni., North Dak.) they all have a lot of draft picks and to a certain degree it is indicative of just how good they are.
Now I remember when UNH would have 5-10 draftees. Easy. Those were the days. Now this all kinda ties in with what NCAA Watcher has posted before, that current UNH players were not top scorers in the USHL. Now I'm just wondering why UNH isn't getting that top echelon of talent anymore. I know there's a lot of reasons. There is a lot of parity in college hockey now. There are a lot of good teams today that weren't always in the past. It's not just the perennial powerhouses that dominate(which I think is great for college hockey and hockey in gen.). Although those teams are still good there are a lot of other real good teams. Just look at the success of the ECAC recently. Basically college hockey is just getting way more competitive and recruiting must be a challenge. Competing with other college teams and major juniors. And having kids committing at such young ages poses challenges. Sometimes they just don't pan out/ develop like teams think they will.
Anyway, all teams have to deal with the same challenges and those "national powerhouses" are still getting those great players. Sometimes one team has 10-15 that are drafted(Minni is just unfair with the Minn. pipeline of talent). Just why is it then that UNH isn't getting that talent anymore? I feel like there's plenty of good players to go around, UNH is a good school and has a good hockey history but UNH is missing out....
Look at the production this year vs. talented teams...
Overall: 14-13-1
___________Record____Avg. Goal For______Avg. Goal Against________Dif._____
Vs. top 10 : 1-7-1 **********1.666********************3******************-1.333
Vs. 11-20 : 5-5-0**********3.2 (+1.6)*****************2.8 (-0.2)************+0.04
vs. NR : 8-1-0**********4.444(+1.2)****************1.77(-1.1)************+2.674
Last two weekends they have averaged 1.75 GPG. 2 goals in two games vs. #6 Union and 5 goals in 2 games vs. #20 Maine.
Just look at this production compared to team defense. Against 1-10 teams the GAA is 3 (Not bad since BC, Minni, Union(0 forwards drafted) are 1-3 in team offense averaging over 3.5 GPG) and against teams 11-20 the GAA is 2.8. So the defense is pretty consistent among top 20 teams. Now on the flip side... the offense is averaging 1.66 GPG against teams 1-10(Only QU and Lowell have GAA under 2 as a point of reference). Then they make a big jump to 3.2 against teams 11-20. So the offense is just not producing against the top teams in the country. I think that's indicative of the type of team UNH is(11-20). I think they're better then their record suggests but not a top 10 team. Now I don't know what's changed or what they need to do to get the players they were getting 10 years ago. But until they do, they will just be a 11-20 team and may make the tournament one year and not the next... I don't want to be satisfied just making the tournament...
Now the good news is that it looks like this short 'draftee drought' is going to end next year. Because it looks like Eiserman and Foegele will be drafted in the spring and will join UNH next year. And it sounds like there could be a couple other real good forwards/ scorers coming in next year as well. Here's hoping UNH can continue to get those types of players and get back to the glory days.
Wow. sorry for the essay guys. Looks like I pulled a Chuck (No offense Chuck. I like your posts). I was just surprised UNH doesn't have a current forward already drafted and that snapped a 30+ year streak so I thought I'd share. UNH could certainly still develop players and have real good teams without having drafted players but drafted players or not the production needs to go up somehow against good teams because putting 9 up against UMass just isn't as good as putting 9 up against BC...
But the last time UNH had two drafted forwards on their team (2010-11: DeSimone & Burke) they went to the Garden. Not saying that's the reason why since Burke only had 3 points all year. Still need a good all around team and production from a variety of people but just trying to think positive!!
That's next year though... We still got this year and we still have a good team. So with a strong finish we could still get to the Garden. Cats just need to take care of business down the stretch here!