I'm going to have to see a lot more "evidence" of a lack of resources than the fact that:
* UNH does not have a third $75K coach (while referencing that the coaches have a budget to be on the road recruiting for longer periods, which in the past has also been cited as a lack of budget)
* Not mentioning the bigger investments UNH has made to fix its disadvantages, including the jumbletron, shortening the rink, and now the lockerrooms. Either these big investment items were wasted, or UNH has actually provided Coach Souza with millions in resources to "fix" what he believed the problems to be.
* I see no evidence that nowadays one can identify the hotshot recruits any better than 11 years ago when Souza was hired to lead recruiting and put his stamp on the program. I'd argue that hotshots are less important today, with the CHL pool allowing you to see what 20 year olds are out there.
* As noted in the article, UNH had deeper resources 11 years ago when Coach Souza was hired. So, is Coach Souza's decade long lack of success the result, or the cause of the lack of resources?
On that last point, the unwillingness of some to even consider a change -- "let's not fix anything unless we can fix what we think the problem is" -- is baffling.
You could argue whether Coach Souza was viewed in the hockey community as a hotshot "he's going places and I want to play for him" 11 yers ago. But, at a certain point, perception is reality. No recruit, after 11 years, is going to look at Coach Souza and say "I'm going to the Garden for the playoffs."
Welcome back, 'Watcher ... and thank you for cogently asking the questions that the backers of the current coaching staff studiously continue to avoid. I'll point out as a reminder to the group, you were early (earliest?) on the boat that Souza was not sufficiently experienced or qualified, and the transition that brought him into the program was poorly conceived. Ditto for Dan. I've migrated in this direction only after watching some of the ineptitude unfold, and by that time a lot of structural damage had already been done to the program. We now literally have over a decade of the Souza Experience to draw conclusions from, and no matter what fixes have been added into the program (Jumbotron, shrunken rink, etc.) the program was still languishing at or near the bottom of Hockey East. This past season was another legit shot at a reboot - CHL players - which MS7 invested heavily in. If he was even a competent D-1 head coach, given that this was a down year for the league, a mid-table finish and a legit shot at Boston were realistic expectations, for sure. Results? Not even close.
At worst, you have two problems, and solving one won't solve the second. But, it also may be that solving the first does solve the second. My brother in law likes to quote the "we've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas" line. Sticking with a proven unsuccessful coach rather than giving someone else a chance certainly seems to capture UNH's approach to solving its hockey problem.
As to the argument that you cannot find a good replacement without resources, any good administrator would find out if that is true -- what resources will someone new demand/ require?
And if the answer truly is, as Mr. McMahon anecdotally offers, that UNH just lacks resources to compete in HE, then is not the answer to drop down to the ECAC or AHA? I would like to see those apologizing for the past decade answer that question. If the problem is insurmountable, what is your plan?
The idea that a highly competent replacement isn't available and viable is almost laughable. With very few exceptions, there is a starting point where a list of candidates could easily be drawn from current D-1 assistant coaches, supplemented by long term pro scouts who may have worked as assistants in the AHL or even the NHL in their pasts. Probably every single one of these people have been working towards an opportunity at higher compensation as someone leading a D-1 program, if not eventually higher. And most of those potential candidates are probably making less than what UNH is paying Coach Souza now.
In another D-1 sport, it wasn't all that long ago that a guy named
Curt Cignetti ("Google me - I win") was toiling at places like Elon and JMU ...
And from a overall perspective, I'm baffled by the why there is not an obvious answer. If Coach Souza is a good fundraiser, securing millions from DiLorenzo, that is a great gift. Northeastern had Coach Madigan have a role in its athletic fundraising. Why not create a position for Souza to keep getting funds for a lockerroom, but why does that have to be tied to Souza also coaching? Did the car dealer condition his gift on a lifetime Souza appointment? And is Souza unwilling to advocate for the car dealer giving the money to fund a different coach? Does Souza even want to keep doing this when internally he must know there are better options for UNH? What is the sticking point to moving Souza and his salary into a fundraising role? Shouldn't Souza be allowed to fail upwards even more into administration, and earn a pension, or is his fundraising only a means to force UNH to keep him in a job so he can "prove" that he's a good coach (all facts to the contrary be damned)? I'm sure that someone that loves UNH as much would not tie fundraising to a personal goal.
Very good (and very pointed) questions, all of which any interviewer worth their salt would put directly to MS7 to force him to confront his situation, which right now looks to me very much like the entitled adult who wants his cake, and to eat it too. TDL is also an active GOP candidate for US Congress right now, and if this current UNH Hockey situation persists much longer, I would relish the opportunity to ask him in public if his generosity to UNH Hockey is indeed tied to some misguided sponsorship of MS7 as an unsuccessful coach for some finite period. But all in all, I agree with the idea that
the obvious solution is to create a position for Souza as a fundraiser, and I've mentioned that possibility on here intermittently in the past. That suddenly changes the optics of this bizarre "sponsorship of the incompetent coach" scenario, and suddenly TDL is just another donor, Souza is just another faceless admin, and someone more qualified and ambitious steps in (Andy Jones of Bentley?), fans are re-energized, and everyone is in a better situation.
My fear is that this "Souza is attached to the DiLorenzo donation" narrative is a self-serving construct, as we've seen no such PR skills from Coach arising from his day job activities. So with his benefactor on the campaign trail increasingly over the next 6 (possibly 8) months, and with politics being an inherently dirty game ... how long before folks start poking/prodding on this curious anti-competitive arrangement, and how much of a stomach does TDL have for it before the false narrative collapses? This project has already been delayed by a year or two ... I wouldn't be shocked or even surprised if there is another delay ...