Just more evidence of how bad the rink is hurting the teams
Identify the problem and a sucker with money to CON and you become Commissioner of Hockey East. It's called failing upward.
I will be interested in Mike's post season wrap up. The flooding of recruits suggests (finally) some sense of urgency after a passive five years of transition. Usually you see that in year one of a transition (remember UMass cutting 8 kids right away)? The way Scarano and Umile set it up, they neutered Souza's ability by not giving him power and making him an assistant. Even when he took the top position he worked to maintain continuity rather than shake things up. You can't "change the culture" by not only not cutting existing guys, but then keeping them as 5th year seniors, when they already have satisfied the implied four year obligations. Souza has done that with a couple of marginal guys, and has another one on the roster who really has not earned a fifth year. Will we see some real changes to the culture?
Perhaps we are seeing the first signs of him asserting himself. At some point he needs to stop being the "nice guy" and take drastic steps. Greg A points out that UNH clawed out of the bad days, but really it was an intense group of Kullen and Coady, who immediately cleaned house and sold new kids on the direction of the new boss. Same with McClosky, who was both personable but incredibly intense. And the gold standard, Shawn Walsh was intense. And it sells to the kids -- they know whose going places by will alone. Just "getting along and not making waves" and being OK being neutered by your boss for three years is something that has to be changed -- that's all on Mike changing his mindset.
Step 2 is recognizing one's limitations and getting someone who can do those things you are bad at. Souza is a bad recruiter. His track record at Brown and at U.Conn establish this, and his three years at UNH 2015 to 2018 are the reason for the major holes in the roster. Souza needs someone with ties beyond the Boston Advantage program or his Lou Finocchio Austin Prep/Malden Catholic kids. The defensive pipeline is decent, and so it should be OK going forward. The offensive pipeline is pretty weak. I see 4 with potential top two line upside (Richels, Cafarelli, Turner and Sacco) but 5 kids who will struggle for playing time. That's not a great ratio.
2020-21
Jr.Crookshank---Jr.Pierson---------Sr.Kelleher
Fr.Richels--------Jr.Engaras -------Sr.Grasso
Sr.Sato-----------So.Stevenson----Sr.MacAdams
Fr.Margel---------Fr.Cafarelli-------Jr.Esposito
Jr.Cipollone------So.Herrmann-----Sr.Sacco
Fr.Sweeney------So.Hankinson---Fr.Gendron
Sr.Maass---------So.Eriksson
Jr.MacKinnon----Fr.Reid
Fr.Jenson-------Jr.Verrier
So.McElhaney----Fr.Nagle
Jr.Hickey
2021-22
Sr.Crookshank--Sr.Pierson------Sr.Engaras
So.Richels-------Jr.Stevenson-----So.Cafarelli
Sr.Esposito------So.Margel--------Fr.D.Sacco
Fr.Devlin---------Fr.Bakos-------Fr.Cronin
Sr.Cipollone----Jr.Herrmann-------Fr.Curran
Fr.J.Ring-------So.Sweeney-------Jr.Hankinson
So.Gendron
Jr.Eriksson--------Fr.Ardanaz
Sr.MacKinnon-----So.Reid
Sr.Verrier----------Fr.Gagne
Jr.McElhaney------Fr.Penney
So.Nagle----------So.Jenson
Sr.Hickey
2022-23
Jr.Richels------Sr.Stevenson---Jr.Cafarelli
-------Fr.Turner--------So.D.Sacco
Jr.Margel--------So.Bakos--------So.Curran
So.Devlin--------Sr.Herrmann----So.Cronin
So.J.Ring-------Fr.Leclerc--------Sr.Hankinson
---Fr.Winters-------Jr.Sweeney--JrGendron
SoArdanaz-----Sr.Eriksson
Jr.Reid---------Fr.Carfagna
So.Gagne------So.Penney
Sr.McElhaney-----Jr.Nagle
Jr.Jenson
At this point, the Madigan model is what we could realistically aspire to: a decent track record that gets a boost by hiring a young proven assistant (Jerry Keefe) who actually had success at Brown, and kids even followed him because they believed in him (NHLers Kevin Roy, Aston-Reese). We can't just carry the myth that Mike will be a great recruiter because he's likeable -- this is an area in which UNH needs dramatic accountability.