not at all. i quite frankly don’t care about any of the things going on in this cat fight beyond a fascination like i’m watching a nature documentary. i’m merely pointing out leaps in logic like that one are ridiculous, just like the leaps in logic you also made about my intentions in your reply. those are also fascinating to dissect, mr “sworn enemy of the perpetually offended”.
So let's try one more time ...
you've created a false equivalency here in the "cat fight" because one of us is here as themselves, in good faith, and one is here in bad faith, cowardly shielding themselves in anonymity while acting like a faceless nameless sniper. And your problem appears to be with me ... because I'm not savvy enough to also be here in bad faith, shielding myself in anonymity while returning fire on potty the cowardly faceless sniper?!? Have I got that right??
Before I get accused of putting words in your mouth, let me know if you agree with my assessment of the situation above or not? That's how I'm reading it, but if I'm missing something, please clarify what you meant, and how you would prefer that I handle the situation??
Now ... once we get past that, we have the current situation, where one on-line character claims s/he has "met me", and follows that with other stuff. As the reader,
wouldn't you like to know how credible that person is? As the target, I know I sure would. Maybe that person HAS met me, and for one reason or another, they didn't like me. Fair, right? Totally agree. I'm not on here with the idea that everyone is going to like me, or agree with everything I say. In fact, since it's an Internet message board, it's kind of a setting that fosters debate between divergent opinions, no?? Disagreement is kind of baked into the cake. My first response to you was basically an extract taken from the 6th Amendment to the US Constitution. Check it out and see where I was going with it.
potty could solve a lot of these issues by clarifying who s/he is, and what his/her agenda might be. You don't even need to surrender your real life name to accomplish that. If you take his/her comments at face value, s/he sounds like s/he is bothered by a few things, one being that NH handles its governmental business differently than MA, and another being that s/he feels my criticism of Coach Souza, and others' criticism of certain players, has gone "over the line". potty is entitled to whatever opinions s/he wants to air, and so am I. Only one of us, though, is running around calling people names in anonymity, and as s/he has recently disclosed, "met" one of his/her targets that s/he is now assailing. Wouldn't it be nice to get a handle on the context of the prior "meeting"?
To be clear ...
nothing posted on here as legitimate opinion, no matter how ill-informed or even demonstrably stupid,
is offensive to me. But if folks act like putzes or pu$$ies in the way they handle their business on here with me or my friends, I will say so. And I have said so.