Concerning if UNH would even think about replacing Souza because of how they typically let coaches stay around forever regardless of results until they want to leave (Umile, Friel, etc), I have to believe that the hockey program is different. It is arguably the premier program and bread winner, most of the rest are little more than vanity projects. As an example, if I am Ford Motor, all my eggs are in the F-150 basket because that is what drives everything else from a dollar standpoint. The new Bronco or small suv can be a bust, but if the F-150 is, then ****e gonna hit the fan because that revenue props up the others.
UNH has to have at least some people within that see this. When the President sees lack of fans and support for the team (once they are allowed to return), then he has to react and put some pressure on Scarano. The BIGGEST job of a University President is fund raising and he came from UNorth Carolina so would clearly see the correlation between winning and fund raising/donations. I have outlined the business school model previously, so the dollars in play are pretty significant for a school and athletic program like UNH. Especially after corona is over because this has already cost them $10-12 million.
If Souza's collar is getting tightened (hopefully), then he better have used a double windsor knot on the two assistants to get out and SELL, SELL, SELL the program.
Whalers, I think we're seeing the same things, and feeling the same frustrations with UNH allowing the program to wallow in the mediocre standing in which it presently stands. One quick point first ...
How do you propose MS7 and his crew are going to
SELL, SELL, SELL their program?
The on-ice product right now is not exactly selling itself. That's a huge impediment. Are future recruits supposed to lap up some rote sell job from a program that struggles to crack .500? As in, all sizzle and no steak? Kids/parents aren't dumb, in fact they have access to more information on the recruiting process than anyone ever has in the history of D-1 hockey.
Player development, maybe? Uhhh ... players who stick around for 4 years (looking at you, Maass) are not progressing, and arguably regressing from developing players when young to mediocre, stagnant players later on. The best ones leave early.
The off-ice product - the vibe in the stands, full capacity crowds, etc. - are a thing of the past. Used to be a HUGE selling point, but when BSinfinity felt compelled to jump in and sterilize the fan experience, a selling point gradually disappeared.
This is why other programs with desperate coaches sometimes feel the need to take shortcuts.
Or why other programs decide to change coaches before their programs crater.
+++++++++++++++++
Today's game was just SO predictable ... 40 minutes of some pretty focused team defending, but just a momentary crack in the edifice, and all bad things just flow in immediately after. If we thought Umile teams were emotionally brittle under the pressure of post-season play at the highest levels ... well, MS7's teams should consider themselves lucky to ever get to that exalted position. Nope, instead, we get the team taking "brittle" to a whole new level, collapsing in nondescript midseason regular season games, like a pup tent under the slightest bit of headwinds. I absolutely detest the part of defending a PP by packing every one of your players at or under the dots. But that's what they continue to do. Get out, pressure the points, clear the slot, and trust your goalie to get good looks and make some saves. The 5 on 3 PP, that's been handled elsewhere.
Robinson had that same "Ayers 2003" look today after Maass messed up in his own end for a second straight night to hand the Friars a lead they never relinquished. Honestly, it's hard to blame him. He's been put in a place where he almost has to be perfect/flawless for his team to have a chance at points. And even when he does his part, which is on most occasions, there's either a veteran teammate making frosh mistakes, or his coaches using dumb passive tactics. It's a cluster, really.
Was the Sato penalty dumb or avoidable? Probably a little of both. But if you have some disciplined clarity from a coach, you'd know that you and your teammates had busted your collective butts for almost two full periods, and it was crucial not to do anything that gave the officials any reason to "even things up" on a night when most of the calls were going your way.
Even at that, the guys managed to kill almost the first two minutes before the second break. With a chance to change things up and maybe catch your opponent a little off-kilter, do you start pressuring the points a little, or do you instruct all four PK players to pack it in under the dots, and do snow angels in hopes of blocking most of the shots and shutting down passing lanes? So passive, so "playing not to lose". For every time it works, I bet there are at least as many times that it doesn't. And the underlying message is one of "we're not good enough" desperation. Not exactly a recipe for success.
This was a winnable game. For the better part of 40 minutes, your guys played relatively penalty-free, organized hockey, and took advantage of two situations for goals, while PC was becoming increasingly frustrated. Three (3) minutes at the start of the 3rd period clearly was going to define whatever followed. Kill that off, and PC is uber-frustrated, and you may even catch them on the break as they fester in their frustration. And if you do allow that first goal during the PK, then damned well make sure you fight back and don't allow them the traction to get a second. Even if the second one came a few seconds later, it was still connected to the PP/PK.
And reeling from the realization that they'd given up in less than 4 minutes what they'd worked so hard to earn over the first 40 minutes, the brittleness sets in, and the 3rd goal was a predictable as the Sun setting in the West.
I can accept and understand limited ability, player or coach. No one is perfect.
I can't tolerate competitive stupidity. And that, my friends, is where we are now.
I've never been closer to a "no mas" on UNH Hockey than I am right now. Sad but true.
This situation is going to require a
LOT more than
SELL, SELL, SELL I'm afraid ... :-(