What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UNH 2018-19: Souza The Opportunity

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember this weekend if we miss the playoffs by 1 or 2 points. Very disappointing.

Well it stings for sure...4th game this season to lose by one. They are just going to have to learn how to win those games and that’s a mentality that I don’t believe can be taught...only learned by doing.

When you are playing so many newbies (who are doing a great job) that’s a lesson that comes down the road I guess...Leadership is very important going forward.
 
Sigh that was a tough way to lose but I think we had our chances and there were some good things out of this night and weekend. Nice to answer with a couple of goals and that 2 on 1 was very well executed.

Coach spoke at the FOH meeting and fielded some pretty tough questions (ones we wanted the reporters to ask) and gave honest and direct answers about the play of the team and other things. It doesn’t get any easier from here so hopefully these two games help us prepare for what’s to come...

Did anyone ask his thoughts on the game winner and the lack of hussle by Gildon? Just watched the replay and he definitely quit on the play.
 
Re: UNH 2018-19: Souza The Opportunity

Not exactly. The comment on the winner was along the lines of “they made one more play than we did.” Not quite the way I would describe the game. I kind of figured the difference would be talent, and it was on display on the winner. MS commented that Bowers is a first round pick. I was pleased they were able to force the overtime. UNH kids are playing hard, they just don’t have a lot of skill. Might be the slowest team I’ve seen. Multiple occasions that would have been breakaways or odd man rushes in the past, but these guys get overtaken by the blue line.

The Gildon question that was asked was basically why not move Max to forward, that seems to be where he wants to play. MS responds that in the NHL today most offense is initiated from the blue line, I wish had more Maxes. Then he conceded that Max needs to work on his defensive details.
 
Not exactly. The comment on the winner was along the lines of “they made one more play than we did.” Not quite the way I would describe the game. I kind of figured the difference would be talent, and it was on display on the winner. MS commented that Bowers is a first round pick. I was pleased they were able to force the overtime. UNH kids are playing hard, they just don’t have a lot of skill. Might be the slowest team I’ve seen. Multiple occasions that would have been breakaways or odd man rushes in the past, but these guys get overtaken by the blue line.

The Gildon question that was asked was basically why not move Max to forward, that seems to be where he wants to play. MS responds that in the NHL today most offense is initiated from the blue line, I wish had more Maxes. Then he conceded that Max needs to work on his defensive details.

Attaboy great answer I knew you’d say it much better than I!! 😉
 
Last edited:
Remember this weekend if we miss the playoffs by 1 or 2 points. Very disappointing.
It was very disappointing! Didnt see the UML game but last night I thought UNH played well especially in the 3rd. Very thin line between winning and losing these days. Thought UNH battled and the effort was there.
 
Great to see you also. Sorry I missed 65. I looked for you guys and then got caught up with my old STH mates! Happy thurkey day!

Sorry that I missed you, too, e.cat. But, no, I did not finish the half full bottle of Bud Lite that you left behind; bletch! :-)

Agree with much of what Darius and ATW wrote earlier about the Friday night game, and some of what Aerman wrote about last night's game. But, I do not agree that the team overall is slow, as I saw a lot good fast transition through the neutral zone, but agree that our breakaways usually get overhauled. Nice exception was the nifty pass that Kelleher made on the 2 on 1 breakaway to assist on second goal last night. Yes, Gildon might be better suited on a forward line, as I think that he is perhaps our worst blue liner defensively. I think that Souza should sit him for a game after that cough up on the PP in OT. Maybe he was gassed, but no excuse for that horrible play.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One of the smartest things Bill James ever noted was how bad teams blame their problems on their best players.</p>— Bill Barnwell (@billbarnwell) <a href="https://twitter.com/billbarnwell/status/1050579657593114625?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 12, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One of the smartest things Bill James ever noted was how bad teams blame their problems on their best players.</p>— Bill Barnwell (@billbarnwell) <a href="https://twitter.com/billbarnwell/status/1050579657593114625?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 12, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Yup, definitely best player on a bad team, which is what makes his defensive lapses so maddening.
 
Re: UNH 2018-19: Souza The Opportunity

Yup, definitely best player on a bad team, which is what makes his defensive lapses so maddening.

Look, I get it. It was a bad play. But you're going to make mistakes when you're asked to push EVERY puck up ice and to the net. You're going to be on the ice for goals against when you're playing 30-35 minutes a night (every other shift, the PK, 2/3's of every PP)...

Max Gildon is not UNH's problem. UNH's problem is they can't score goals. They're not going to win many games until they can find a way to consistently score three goals a night. You can't win games scoring two goals per game. And, quite frankly, without Max Gildon this UNH team would struggle to score more than one...

He has not just figured in, but flat out created, half of UNH's goals this season. And that is because he is an elite talent at creating offense from the back end. A skill UNH has clearly told him to put into practice, because they desperately need it. They've certainly asked him to carry much of the offensive torch and he has done so admirably, while managing to be only a -1 (tied for second best on the team). All while his regular defensive partner is a -5...

Asking him to play forward instead is ridiculous. He's not a forward. He's never played forward. Moving him up front makes your best offensive player uncomfortable and worse - leading to less offense from him. You also have to replace him on the back end with a lesser player both in terms of blueline offense AND defense. He is a lesser defensive player than Wyse and Maass and that's it. Giving more minutes to Boyd and Dawson will lead to more goals against. Period. Remember watching the team from two years ago struggle to get any pucks out of their own end? Does anyone really want to go back to that? It's a horrible idea born out of frustration and nothing else...

Yes, Gildon still makes mistakes, which is what happens when your aggressive. But he makes far less than he did last year and he is improving consistently on defense, while carrying the offense as best he can. Gildon could have played more like Maass last night - and shot the puck that led to Nazarian's goal into the corner. UNH would have lost 2-1 in regulation instead. Would that make people happier? For all his so called 'defensive faults', last night's game winner was the only goal Gildon was on the ice for all weekend...

Its a lot like Poturalski getting much of the blame for only scoring nearly two points per game, but not 3 - and not keeping every puck out of the net at the same time. UNH's problem the last few years has not been their best players - its been the complete lack of depth and support for their best players. A good team would have a number of good players, allowing every one of them to do what they do best and not be depended on to do what they do best, then some and everything else too...

The question that should have been asked of Souza is why, after four years of your recruiting, do we not have a deeper roster...
 
Last edited:
Yup, definitely best player on a bad team, which is what makes his defensive lapses so maddening.

I’m not sure the team (as evidenced by Souza’s comments last night) is blaming Max for the teams shortcomings...more like fans blaming him...there’s no question he’s the best player on the ice...as has been duly noted.

And to no ones surprise I’m just not sure Id call UNH a bad team. (I can sense the eye rolling from here). And yes...it was a hard way to losefor sure there’s no doubt about it. We had a great 3rd period kept BU at bay. Like others happy to push OT.

It comes down to putting more pucks in the net than the other guys and we have to be able to do that...hopefully we can. Anyway I’m kind of delerious from this big hockey weekend so maybe I’ll come to my senses by the Miami weekend. Hey it could happen!!!!???
 
Look, I get it. It was a bad play. But you're going to make mistakes when you're asked to push EVERY puck up ice and to the net. You're going to be on the ice for goals against when you're playing 30-35 minutes a night (every other shift, the PK, 2/3's of every PP)...

Max Gildon is not UNH's problem. UNH's problem is they can't score goals. They're not going to win many games until they can find a way to consistently score three goals a night. You can't win games scoring two goals per game. And, quite frankly, without Max Gildon this UNH team would struggle to score more than one...

He has not just figured in, but flat out created, half of UNH's goals this season. And that is because he is an elite talent at creating offense from the back end. A skill UNH has clearly told him to put into practice, because they desperately need it. They've certainly asked him to carry much of the offensive torch and he has done so admirably, while managing to be only a -1 (tied for second best on the team). All while his regular defensive partner is a -5...

Asking him to play forward instead is ridiculous. He's not a forward. He's never played forward. Moving him up front makes your best offensive player uncomfortable and worse - leading to less offense from him. You also have to replace him on the back end with a lesser player both in terms of blueline offense AND defense. He is a lesser defensive player than Wyse and Maass and that's it. Giving more minutes to Boyd and Dawson will lead to more goals against. Period. Remember watching the team from two years ago struggle to get any pucks out of their own end? Does anyone really want to go back to that? It's a horrible idea born out of frustration and nothing else...

Yes, Gildon still makes mistakes, which is what happens when your aggressive. But he makes far less than he did last year and he is improving consistently on defense, while carrying the offense as best he can. Gildon could have played more like Maass last night - and shot the puck that led to Nazarian's goal into the corner. UNH would have lost 2-1 in regulation instead. Would that make people happier? For all his so called 'defensive faults', last night's game winner was the only goal Gildon was on the ice for all weekend...

Its a lot like Poturalski getting much of the blame for only scoring nearly two points per game, but not 3 - and not keeping every puck out of the net at the same time. UNH's problem the last few years has not been their best players - its been the complete lack of depth and support for their best players. A good team would have a number of good players, allowing every one of them to do what they do best and not be depended on to do what they do best, then some and everything else too...

The question that should have been asked of Souza is why, after four years of your recruiting, do we not have a deeper roster...

Great post Dan...exactly. Bingo. Ding ding ding. I guess when you have a player of his caliber you expect the moon from them. It’s a lot to shoulder. Imagine UNH hockey without him...
 
Re: UNH 2018-19: Souza The Opportunity

A person's perception makes their reality, but it does not make it real. One of the most important skills of a coach is for their perception of their team and all of the individual players to be as close to reality as possible. All players have strengths and weaknesses. The best coaches accurately identify the strengths and weaknesses of their players and come up with a system of play that makes best use of the strengths while hiding the weaknesses.
 
Re: UNH 2018-19: Souza The Opportunity

Last week I wrote this up, but decided not to post it until now:


I was disappointed with UNH’s performance against UMass this past weekend like the majority of the people on this forum. UMass is a better skating and skilled team and played with more speed and intensity. The cumulative skill level of the six UMass players on the ice any given shift was better the vast majority of the time than the six UNH players.

Over the last couple of days there has been much talk about the goaltending. It is almost impossible to compare goalies from different teams. The UNH goalie in 2018 can’t be compared to the goalie from 2015 or 2010 or 2005. The 18 skaters playing with them are different. The statistic of save percentage can be very misleading. A shot from far out and a bad angle is much different than a tap in shot from the back door. Yes, over the course of many games and hundreds of shots you would think the quality of shots would balance out, but not necessarily. The Edmonton Oilers from the 1980’s gave up a lot more odd man rushes and quality shots than the average NHL team from the 80’s did. Grant Fuhr was a great goalie, but his save percentage would have been better if you played for a more defensive style team. Their run-and-gun style of play was a lot of fun to watch though!

I believe if Tuukka Rask was able to play goalie for UNH for five games afterwards most of us would be disappointed in his performance. We would have thought he should have been better. If Torey Krug was able to play for UNH for five games we also would be surprised in a disappointing way in his play. This goes for other NHL players too. One player can not do it by themselves in hockey. It takes all six players on the ice together. It takes all 20 players that dress for the game.


A lot of things (mistakes) lead up to goals being scoring against you. It is not necessarily the goalie's fault if the puck goes in the net or the closest defending player. Usually there are three or four mistakes that lead up to that goal being scored.
 
Last edited:
Last week I wrote this up, but decided not to post it until now:


I was disappointed with UNH’s performance against UMass this past weekend like the majority of the people on this forum. UMass is a better skating and skilled team and played with more speed and intensity. The cumulative skill level of the six UMass players on the ice any given shift was better the vast majority of the time than the six UNH players.

Over the last couple of days there has been much talk about the goaltending. It is almost impossible to compare goalies from different teams. The UNH goalie in 2018 can’t be compared to the goalie from 2015 or 2010 or 2005. The 18 skaters playing with them are different. The statistic of save percentage can be very misleading. A shot from far out and a bad angle is much different than a tap in shot from the back door. Yes, over the course of many games and hundreds of shots you would think the quality of shots would balance out, but not necessarily. The Edmonton Oilers from the 1980’s gave up a lot more odd man rushes and quality shots than the average NHL team from the 80’s did. Grant Fuhr was a great goalie, but his save percentage would have been better if you played for a more defensive style team. Their run-and-gun style of play was a lot of fun to watch though!

I believe if Tuukka Rask was able to play goalie for UNH for five games afterwards most of us would be disappointed in his performance. We would have thought he should have been better. If Torey Krug was able to play for UNH for five games we also would be surprised in a disappointing way in his play. This goes for other NHL players too. One player can not do it by themselves in hockey. It takes all six players on the ice together. It takes all 20 players that dress for the game.


A lot of things (mistakes) lead up to goals being scoring against you. It is not necessarily the goalie's fault if the puck goes in the net or the closest defending player. Usually there are three or four mistakes that lead up to that goal being scored.

Thanks for a great post Ray glad you decided to put it up. As they say that’s why there is no “I” in the word TEAM.....
 
Re: UNH 2018-19: Souza The Opportunity

Thanks HockeyRef.

I did not watch either of the games this weekend. I have only seen the highlights on YouTube. I hate discussing generalities, I prefer being specific.

Let's get a discussion started: Who do you think is the best defensive defenseman (most likely the best penalty killing defenseman) on the team this season? Probably more important, who do you think the coaches feel is the best defensive defenseman?
 
Thanks HockeyRef.

I did not watch either of the games this weekend. I have only seen the highlights on YouTube. I hate discussing generalities, I prefer being specific.

Let's get a discussion started: Who do you think is the best defensive defenseman (most likely the best penalty killing defenseman) on the team this season? Probably more important, who do you think the coaches feel is the best defensive defenseman?

Personally at this point I would go with Wyse...and MacKinnon right behind him. As per the coaches? Of course they would feel the same..HA!
 
Re: UNH 2018-19: Souza The Opportunity

Speaking of defense and goalies Casey DeSmith posted a 39 save shutout last night...
 
Personally at this point I would go with Wyse...and MacKinnon right behind him. As per the coaches? Of course they would feel the same..HA!

MacKinnon is that type of defenseman and will be strong, but he's not there yet. He makes a lot of coverage mistakes and is a team leading -5, in a lot less ice time than the top three...

It's Wyse in my opinion - and playing with Maass gives them their top D pair. It might be worth jumbling the pairs.

Wyse - Gildon
MacKinnon - Maass

If they're going to ask Gildon to do so much offensively, and they should - then give him the most dependable partner. And at the same time, let MacKinnon fill a more traditional defensive role, rather than one he may not be ready for, and a more traditional partner...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top