The makeup of the South Atlantic League leads me to believe the Lowell Spinners might be back in the next years. Some of the teams in the North Division (Hudson Valley, Brooklyn, Aberdeen) are teams from the NY Penn League and still within distance for bus travel. The Southern Division of the SAL League is a different story, but I know the structure of road trips are regulated by MILB to cut down on travel costs. I do not believe the Greenville Drive signed a long term affiliation agreement unlike the Portland Sea Dogs who signed a 20 year deal with the Red Sox. Long term affiliation agreements seems to be the new standard barer in MILB.
I will stand by my theory of a team unaffiliated with the Red Sox, but still MLB affiliated will not to do well in Lowell. So it's either all or nothing...
The New Hampshire Fisher Cats are a Blue Jays affiliate and do very well in Manchester, so a non-Red Sox affiliate can work in this area.
Does anybody know if there is going to be an exhibition game this season?
Given that Opening Night is October 1, I'd say no. The last time Lowell played an exhibition game was 12/29/2019 vs the CCHL All-Stars. The last time they had one to open the season was 10/7/2018 vs Acadia.
I think this team will be very good next year, I think better than last year, and because Lowell doesn’t have draft picks doesn’t mean they will not be successful. If the team didn’t have players getting invites to development camps, you “may” have a point. Scouts miss just as much as they hit.
Just remember, the team’s last two losses over the last two years were to the national champion (UMass ‘21 & Denver ‘22). Both games…1 goal losses.
they got a good goalie in the portal, kid can playLowell doesn't have Savory in net this season, and the G position is a huge question mark. I like the pskaters they're bringing in, but this team is only going as far as Nordlund and Welsch can bring them.
This thread seems kind of dead. No buzz. No excitement about the coming season. Maybe it's the lack of drafted NHL prospects the last few years. I know that's the case with me. I get depressed seeing we only have 6 recruits for 2023 and beyond, 4 fewer than UNH's 10 and 16 less than Maine, 14 less than Umass-Amherst, and even 11 fewer than Vermont's 17 recruits as noted on the UML recruiting thread. Yes that's right, Vermont!!!!!!! Remember when the flagship was an easy 3 victories a season? And the number of recruits is not even commenting on the talent level of the mix of those players, no top tier recruits, no top development players (U-17 ever), no goalies (heck Lowell has always been a Goalie school) compared to other teams. It's fine to seek "Lowell type players" but being a dominant team would be nice once in a while. What are we down to now? One drafted player? Now drafted players are no guarantee of success, but players like Andre Lee do bring a must see excitement to the team, as did Connor Hellebuyck, and Scott Wilson. These guys complemented the likes of Berglund, Pendeza, Wetmore, and formed the foundation for the CJ Smith's and Gambardella's of the world.
I know there is a shifting paradigm in college hockey with some programs having success going with "older experienced kids", but I know the lack of drafted players has me giving up my season ticket after 10 years as talent, high skating and scoring ability do win out. Now Minnesota State was a great story.........BUT talented Denver won the whole enchilada. UML hockey has me feeling like I do with the Red Sox this year, NOT must see TV. i want the arena jumping again. YES!!!! We have had success, but just tired of being a top 20 team with a goal of making the NCAA tournament, rather than being in the Frozen 4 mix. I applaud the student athlete accolades the team receives, and the grit and determination the team shows..........BUT talent breeds excitement to a program. It was nice to take UMASS-Amherst on in the Hockey East title game, and Denver in the regionals, but that talent gap/recruiting gap was too hard to overcome and predetermined the outcome in my view.
Good luck UML and I hope my attitude changes but you know what they say about insanity.......it's doing the same thing over and over again and hoping for a different result........I'm hoping UML becomes less insane
Just to clarify or expand on my earlier post. I do not think Lowell needs (or for that matter would ever get) a 1st or 2nd round NHL draft choice as a recruit. I agree that those players do not fit the Lowell profile of stressing academics, because they are already counting their NHL bonus contracts and would only stay one year. Michigan and BU prove that. A larger point is that our coaching staff is more defense oriented, so realistically that high draft pick kid is not going to develop his offensive skills further in our environment. But sprinkling the roster with a couple of draft prospects in Rounds 3 - 7 per year, that stay through their Junior year (aka Andre Lee) would help. I reiterate it is all about talent. When the program was consistently in the top 5 or 10 nationally our roster was primarily USHL players that had talent, a few mid level drafted players and very few NAHL or other lower level junior league players. Right now I believe we have one drafted player on the roster and when Ben Meehen leaves this year we will have ZERO. First time in a long, long, long time.
While hawkeytown is correct in saying that we only lost to UMass in '21 and Denver in '22 by one goal, that analysis misses one key point. Our lack of offensive pressure in both games doomed us. If memory serves me correctly we had something in the range of 13 shots in the that UMass game and granted UMass scored a fluke goal off the back of our goalie's shoulder.......BUT our lack of talent, OFFENSIVE talent made any comeback moot, as we could not generate any shots on net. For me I just knew there was no way we were going to mount a comeback, because we did not have the offensive talent. Skating, speed, scoring ability and developing an opportunity were not high skills. The same could be said against Denver. Our lack of consistent offensive pressure assured a Denver victory once they were ahead as they could dictate the pace and flow of the game. Under those situations everything needs to go right for Lowell to win those games. We need to play in front and stay in front in my view.
Now all is not doom and gloom for the program. I was just pointing out how spoiled I was by those years of success. I never felt we were out of a game then. We had the talent to mount a comeback. But the last 3-4 years pretty much guarantee a loss when we are behind. The guys work hard and all. BUT we can't get over the top. I am just pointing out that better recruiting on the margins would possibly have us as contenders rather than nail biters to just make the NCAA tournament, and if anyone looks at the recruits on the horizon we have by far the fewest of any team in Hockey East. Thank God for portal transfers....LOL
You can say that they were a good team, but still question their lack of offense. They finished 7th out of 11 Hockey East teams in scoring last year (in league play). Being second in league play in goals allowed is what made their season a success last year. I think that I (and some others) would also like to see our attacking options improve, and that would actually make us a danger to win the whole thing, not just make the tournament. We had that type of team in 16/17 with Gamby/CJ et al, finishing first in HE scoring (and let's be honest, that's not going to happen often), and tied for second in GA. Lost in OT and kept out of the Frozen Four.I really cannot agree. The ‘21 team was a really talented team, dude. They were hampered by covid, and could never get consistent team play. They lose Bergland 11 games in, and he is averaging a point a game with inconsistent play due to covid. Lowell gets into the HockeyEast tournament as a 7 seed, plays from behind in every playoff game, including to the number 1 seed BC eagles (who were #2 in the country at the time), DOWN 4-1, at Conte, to an offensive juggernaut, and come back and win 6-5. They go to UMass, where they score a goal but it’s waved off and lose 1-0. They had chances in that game, including numerous posts hit. We lacked “offensive pressure”
They come in the next year, losing Matt Brown, who transfers to BU, and may be one of BU’s top players, if not a top offensive player in HockeyEast. Blackmun transfers to Notre Dame, and may have been our best offensive defenseman. Baxter transfers to RPI. Barton leaves early for pro’s. Seniors like Levesque leave. We gain Owens, Crasa and Brushett, who look to be a solid players. Lowell finishes as one of the top teams in HockeyEast, get an autobid for the national tournament. Play Denver, in Denver, at a high altitude, lose 3-2 and you complain that this team “lacked offensive pressure”? Lowell played Denver incredibly tough, man. Michigan lost to Denver 3-2 in the frozen four. Did Michigan ( a massive wagon) lack offensive pressure, in Boston, not Denver? Like you can’t be serious dude.
You can say that they were a good team, but still question their lack of offense. They finished 7th out of 11 Hockey East teams in scoring last year (in league play). Being second in league play in goals allowed is what made their season a success last year. I think that I (and some others) would also like to see our attacking options improve, and that would actually make us a danger to win the whole thing, not just make the tournament. We had that type of team in 16/17 with Gamby/CJ et al, finishing first in HE scoring (and let's be honest, that's not going to happen often), and tied for second in GA. Lost in OT and kept out of the Frozen Four.
And just to clarify, we weren't an autobid last year. The only HE team to get an autobid is the one that wins the HE Tournament.