BBDiehard14
New member
Jeremy Swayman is forgoing his remaining three years of eligibility and going pro.[/QUOTE
April Fools Joke?
One Facebooker wrote the Pats traded for OBJ
Jeremy Swayman is forgoing his remaining three years of eligibility and going pro.[/QUOTE
April Fools Joke?
One Facebooker wrote the Pats traded for OBJ
Regarding Maine not making the Hockey East semifinals, yes the six year drought is the longest in the team's history, double the next longest drought (2007-2009).I also want to ammend my last statement about NCAA odds. What are even the odds this team makes the Garden in the next 3 years? 35 percent ish? Its been 6 years already. Has to be the longest in Maine history.
Coach Gendron had one of the best first seasons as a head coach of a team in Hockey East, fifth out of 25 coaches, but after five seasons his cumulative record is 18th (up from 21st after four seasons). It was also the first time his cumulative winning percentage rose.I do realize that people want to avoid another so-called "re-build", but the fact of the matter is that every single year of Red's tenure has looked exactly like a rebuild to me, if not -more accurately- a regression as often as not.
off topic a bit.. did admin ban Black1? He went a bit over the top with all the threads last night.. & the new ones he started this morning.. but nothing malicious, was trying hard for april fools.
He's quite funny. Anyway, hope he is allowed back.. harmless really. And a lot of energy for Maine hockey.
carry on..
Since I already had each school's reported hockey expenses (except Army) from 2010 through 2016 I created a workbook with each conference's team's expenses vs league finishes for those seasons. There really isn't a lot of correlation between expenses and league finish.Location matters less than money. Maine may outspend Tech, but I'd wager Tech's spend on hockey is closer to the top of its conference (Minnesota State? Probably the Alaskas on pure dollars but that's all travel) than Maine's hockey spending is to BU/BC/PC/NU. Yes there will be year to year anomalies, but I bet if you made a chart ranking each conference annually by spending and one each year by conference standings, they'd be pretty similar. Spend more money, get better results.
Since I already had each school's reported hockey expenses (except Army) from 2010 through 2016 I created a workbook with each conference's team's expenses vs league finishes for those seasons. There really isn't a lot of correlation between expenses and league finish.
Sean
So this is quick and dirty, but by average spend over the seven years (only teams that were in HE the whole time):
1. BC
2. BU
3. PC
4. UNH
5. Northeastern
6. UMA
7. UML
8. Maine
9. Vermont
10. Merrimack
And by average finish:
1. BC
2. BU
3. UML
4. UNH
5. PC
6. Maine
7. Northeastern
8. Merrimack
9. UVM
10. UMA
UMA needs to get better at spending money, I guess. UML gets great bang for the buck. 4 of the top 5 are the same (BC/BU/PC/UNH).
To make that meaningful you'd have to subtract scholarship funds. A free ride at BC or BU costs more than at a state school. That would give a more accurate accounting of each school's true expenses for ice hockey.
off topic a bit.. did admin ban Black1? He went a bit over the top with all the threads last night.. & the new ones he started this morning.. but nothing malicious, was trying hard for april fools.
He's quite funny. Anyway, hope he is allowed back.. harmless really. And a lot of energy for Maine hockey.
carry on..
That is true. The accounting standards certainly vary widely, as well. My math is at work, I think BC's average spend was double Maine's (roughly). Whether 20 scholarships accounts for $2M, I can't tell you.
Since I already had each school's reported hockey expenses (except Army) from 2010 through 2016 I created a workbook with each conference's team's expenses vs league finishes for those seasons. There really isn't a lot of correlation between expenses and league finish.
Sean
You're welcome. I was interested in seeing how closely expenses correlated to finish once you brought it up.This is awesome, thank you, but I'm not sure I really agree with the conclusion. I am going to play with this a lot. My early observations are that UMass gets a crappy bang for its buck, and that PC's trip into the top half of the league coincided pretty closely to it upping its spending.
If you wanted averages you could have looked the numbers up on my NCAA Financials workbook (link in my sig).So this is quick and dirty, but by average spend over the seven years (only teams that were in HE the whole time)(BC/BU/PC/UNH).
My workbook has either actual or estimated athletic aid (read the third paragraph of the first post in the NCAA Hockey Financials thread. If you want to compare spending without athletic aid you can subtract the actual and estimated amounts from total expenses (if you trust my work).To make that meaningful you'd have to subtract scholarship funds. A free ride at BC or BU costs more than at a state school. That would give a more accurate accounting of each school's true expenses for ice hockey.
Yes, but it's not your opinion that matters, it's the recruits' opinions that matter.But it's the best venue in NCAA hockey in my opinion.
I don't think they banned me yet.I made jokes for a purpose but didn't want to ruin Easter for folks. So the ones that saw early am got a chuckle.
it was a joke with an expiration date so to speak.
I deleted after that and had busy easter myself.
No worries, I promise to be back to my goofy "loveable" self.![]()
Or else not.news is slow this time of the year.
glad to hear that. you had a few good ones in there.. can't take ourselves too seriously![]()
Yes, but it's not your opinion that matters, it's the recruits' opinions that matter.
Sean
Yes, but it's not your opinion that matters, it's the recruits' opinions that matter.
Sean
You're welcome. I was interested in seeing how closely expenses correlated to finish once you brought it up.
If you wanted averages you could have looked the numbers up on my NCAA Financials workbook (link in my sig).
My workbook has either actual or estimated athletic aid (read the third paragraph of the first post in the NCAA Hockey Financials thread. If you want to compare spending without athletic aid you can subtract the actual and estimated amounts from total expenses (if you trust my work).
Sean
First, I don't believe I have ever called Maine, or any other team, inferior to BU. Second, just because BU has a newer arena that is arguably one of the top arenas in college hockey don't mean they will automatically win every game there. This season they had the fewest wins for a full season and tied for their worst record percentage wise at Agganis, which I was not happy about since I attend every home game. As why BU lost to Maine at Agganis, a number of BU posters on this forum claimed it was the BU coaching. I think the long layoff, 4 weeks (scheduled by Coach Quinn), was a factor, as was Patrick Harper playing, but not being well (it was his last game of the season). That said, Maine also beat BU at Alfond, so I would also say that Maine was not a good matchup with BU this past season.Why did you lose on home ice to such an inferior team?