What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UMaine 25-26: Marques My Word: Back to the Big Time

University of Maine Launches Black Bear Student-Athlete Experience Fund

ORONO, Maine – University of Maine Athletics has created the Black Bear Student-Athlete Experience Fund to support student-athletes and promote the continued competitiveness and excellence of the state's only Division I program, consistent with the recent House vs. NCAA settlement.

The new fund will allow fans to give to UMaine varsity athletic programs and student-athletes in meaningful ways, including but not limited to scholarships, nutrition, travel and direct pay.

Donors can provide general support to be used at the discretion of the university or direct their giving to a particular team.
Sounds like Friends of Maine Hockey with different branding.
 
Whenever the topic of campus site regionals comes up, I always have to wonder if it would be feasible and realistic. I know it's how the NCAA tournament was held back in the day, but things have changed a lot. The way I see it, if you were to do it, you would have two options: either a), the #1 seed hosts the entire regional in their arena, all three games, or b) you have the higher seeded team host the games as they come up. Both of these pose major challenges. In scenario A, what happens if in a hypothetical situation, an Atlantic Hockey team has an exceptionally strong season and gets a #1 seed? You want to have a regional held in a building that seats less than 2000 spectators, as most of those are? Or in a more realistic option, what if UConn and their tiny new arena got a #1 seed? Or what if a school in a really remote location was a #1, think Clarkson, or Michigan Tech, would there be enough fan travel capability to get there, and even if there was, could a remote area like that accommodate enough people? I know they recently held a regional at a practice arena in Maryland Heights just like two years ago, but that was rightfully panned by fans and teams across the college hockey world and was a bit of an embarrassment for the NCAA. The alternative could be that you have a larger building elsewhere nearby host, i.e the XL Center in the UConn scenario, but then that almost defeats the purpose of a "campus site regional", dosen't it? Or, in situation B, what if there was ridiculous travel at play? For instance, what if in a hypothetical region, the NPI shakes out where the #1 seed was BU, #2 was Arizona State, and #3 was Maine. Would it be fair to expect Maine to fly from Orono to Tempe, and then assuming they both won, fly back east to Boston and play another game 2 days later on Comm Ave? I suppose you could try and argue thats just how it is, but thats a hell of a lot of travel to ask of a team and could just as easily argue that it would do harm to competitive balance. I think the current system of having regionals in minor league arenas is about the best they can do, as much as they can be lame sometimes. If anything, the major change you could advocate for more, and maybe even possibly get passed, would be to end the practice of locking the host school into their regional should they qualify. Either you just let the bracket fall where it may, or alternatively you do what the NCAA itself already does in the March Madness basketball, where the host school is actually barred from playing in their arena, even if the seeding fell that they would have otherwise.
I personally think there should be on campus sites. According to Google ai 80-85% of all NCAA mens d1 hockey arenas have a seating capacity of 2500+. To counter your argument there has NEVER been a team in the top 8 of the pairwise that has an arena that seats less than 2500 according to google ai. This be honest, realistically all teams that are committed to hockey (especially now with NIL) and are going to perform good are going to have an arena over the size of 2500+, many more much bigger than that size. Google ai lists some of the most recent teams that finished top 8 of the pairwise in recent years with smaller seating capacities as Quinnipiac (3,287), Cornell (4,300), Providence (3,030) and Harvard (2,776).

Last year the 4 regionals had an attendance of around 4800-7400 per regional in the 1st round so an average of 2400-3700 between the two games 1st round games at each regional. The regional final games had 6,933, 4,329, 6,802, and 6,453. Google ai says there are 35 or more arenas that seat 4,000 or more. 19 seat 5,000 or more. 14 with 6,000 or more. It'd look a lot better (tv production wise/atmosphere wise) with an arena that is closer to being full than an arena that might be completely full for 1 game and almost empty the next game or 1/2 and 1/2 between the 2 first round games in each regional AT BEST.

I agree with your alternative scenario with schools having the option to host somewhere nearby if there arena is smaller, but as you said that somewhat ruins the point of having an onsite campus regional.

My proposal on the idea is what if the NCAA hockey season gets expanded until mid/late April, instead of early/mid April like it has been (Including playoffs)? Is there something in the rules/by laws that prevent the season from going that long? So I would say split the regionals so 1-8 host the 1st round games on one weekend and then reseed so the top 4 can host the 2nd round games the following weekend. Would cut down some overall travel costs for teams as well, but cost more for ESPN.

One negative of this for ESPN is they would need to do 8 extra setups (unless they are an Hockey East or ECAC team than they could decide to run with their inhouse team(s) if they so choose). One option is the NCAA could choose to have a bye week between conference championships and the NCAA tournament, this would make it so the NCAA hockey tournament would interfere much less with the NCAA Basketball tournament. ESPN would have more crew available to work on the hockey tournament since it would not be as tied up with NCAA basketball duties (and could get more of a chance to air on a bigger channel for more viewership, ex: ESPN, ESPN2), though NBA/NHL playoffs start around mid April. An alternative to avoid the NBA/NHL playoffs is to get rid of the extra week off in-between the 2nd round games and the frozen four but that would give less time for people to make plans.
 
I personally think there should be on campus sites. According to Google ai 80-85% of all NCAA mens d1 hockey arenas have a seating capacity of 2500+. To counter your argument there has NEVER been a team in the top 8 of the pairwise that has an arena that seats less than 2500 according to google ai. This be honest, realistically all teams that are committed to hockey (especially now with NIL) and are going to perform good are going to have an arena over the size of 2500+, many more much bigger than that size. Google ai lists some of the most recent teams that finished top 8 of the pairwise in recent years with smaller seating capacities as Quinnipiac (3,287), Cornell (4,300), Providence (3,030) and Harvard (2,776).

Last year the 4 regionals had an attendance of around 4800-7400 per regional in the 1st round so an average of 2400-3700 between the two games 1st round games at each regional. The regional final games had 6,933, 4,329, 6,802, and 6,453. Google ai says there are 35 or more arenas that seat 4,000 or more. 19 seat 5,000 or more. 14 with 6,000 or more. It'd look a lot better (tv production wise/atmosphere wise) with an arena that is closer to being full than an arena that might be completely full for 1 game and almost empty the next game or 1/2 and 1/2 between the 2 first round games in each regional AT BEST.

I agree with your alternative scenario with schools having the option to host somewhere nearby if there arena is smaller, but as you said that somewhat ruins the point of having an onsite campus regional.

My proposal on the idea is what if the NCAA hockey season gets expanded until mid/late April, instead of early/mid April like it has been (Including playoffs)? Is there something in the rules/by laws that prevent the season from going that long? So I would say split the regionals so 1-8 host the 1st round games on one weekend and then reseed so the top 4 can host the 2nd round games the following weekend. Would cut down some overall travel costs for teams as well, but cost more for ESPN.

One negative of this for ESPN is they would need to do 8 extra setups (unless they are an Hockey East or ECAC team than they could decide to run with their inhouse team(s) if they so choose). One option is the NCAA could choose to have a bye week between conference championships and the NCAA tournament, this would make it so the NCAA hockey tournament would interfere much less with the NCAA Basketball tournament. ESPN would have more crew available to work on the hockey tournament since it would not be as tied up with NCAA basketball duties (and could get more of a chance to air on a bigger channel for more viewership, ex: ESPN, ESPN2), though NBA/NHL playoffs start around mid April. An alternative to avoid the NBA/NHL playoffs is to get rid of the extra week off in-between the 2nd round games and the frozen four but that would give less time for people to make plans.
1) You still haven't explained how the NCAA is going to make money. It gets mid-six figures every season having neutral sites bid to host. You need to replace that revenue.
2) What about arenas that host events other than hockey? Agganis typically hosts the circus the week after the Hockey East finals. They've booked it for 10 days this year. Are you expecting them to hold open the arena on the off-chance BU hosts? You going to reimburse them for the lost revenue? Or double book the arena and hope BU doesn't host? But if they do? Call up the Ringling Brothers and apologize that they've been scheduled for a year and have already sold tens of thousands of tickets, but we have some hockey games to play?
 
This may be a stupid question and take, but in what way is money an issue? Maine would’ve pulled in McQueen, Boisvert, and McKenna, if they were offered the same ballpark?

Talent and depth wasn’t really the issue this yr. Has anyone involved in recruitment or player development alluded to an unmet need or a problem being funding? If there were unlimited funds what would be done differently? I thought that most people thought (1) Maine has the coach it wants (2) extremely nice facilities and (3) not a huge need for one-and-done-paycheck-chasing-players. I also don’t really know the program for being that hard to fundraise for

There's a whole universe of players out there who don't expect a $750,000 check to show up for one year like McKenna, but also who expect to get more than a scholarship, room, and board. I'm not out here arguing for a $10,000,000 slush fund to get the ten biggest names each year. I'm also not arguing for Maine to get into bidding wars with BC or BU for every player. None of that is feasible. But if a kid is sifting through scholarship/NIL offers, and he's got four or five that will write him a $20,000 check, and ten or so that won't, it's tough to pull ahead of the other 15 schools involved if you are one of the $0 bidders. And those guys aren't necessarily one-and-done.

Not all of those guys are at BC/BU/Michigan, either. Providence has kids making money. UConn has kids making money. The amount of money that would make a real difference isn't ridiculous, there can't be many more than 20 college hockey programs that give enough of a shit to find $150,000 or so to get their players some cash. That's the kind of thing that a fan base like Maine's can accomplish, and it just needed to be set up. Huge kudos to the athletic department for making this push and getting it up and running.
 
If there's enough money at a Regional for the NC$$ to make 6 figures and for the venue and the host school to both make money, it seems likely there's enough money for the NC$$ to take a cut, and the #1 seed to get some scratch hosting the 3 game Regional.

I agree that the number 1's should host the Regionals. In their barn, as long as they seat 4,000 minimum. Maybe 6,000 minimum. Give every team the chance, before the season, to name a secondary arena if theirs isn't big enough. Bentley could name Worcester, for example. Or Conte. Go crazy - all of Hockey East could name the Garden, which would put a Regional there more years than not. If Maine is a 3-seed, wouldn't it be better to play in Boston than Albany? If this is about the student athletes, let's make it about the student athletes.
 
Nice discussion on regionals- not sure of solution but going to ramp up next two years
2027 in east- Springfield and Bridgeport
2028 Rochester NY and allentown Pa
most tough for new england teams
 
Let top 8 host best of 3 series.
1) You still haven't explained how the NCAA is going to make money. It gets mid-six figures every season having neutral sites bid to host. You need to replace that revenue.
2) What about arenas that host events other than hockey? Agganis typically hosts the circus the week after the Hockey East finals. They've booked it for 10 days this year. Are you expecting them to hold open the arena on the off-chance BU hosts? You going to reimburse them for the lost revenue? Or double book the arena and hope BU doesn't host? But if they do? Call up the Ringling Brothers and apologize that they've been scheduled for a year and have already sold tens of thousands of tickets, but we have some hockey games to play?

How much is it to bid on a regional?
 
Let top 8 host best of 3 series.

How much is it to bid on a regional?
Minimum 150k and the host covers all the expenses. And they get a measly 20 percent and NCAA takes 80 percent profit. There is a reason why the same shitholes host all the time. NCAA milking their last huge revenue ripoff. Hosting by higher seeds may be less money but can you imagine Alfond hosting a regional game? People would pay 100+ a ticket. Club 300+ easy.
 
Minimum 150k and the host covers all the expenses. And they get a measly 20 percent and NCAA takes 80 percent profit. There is a reason why the same shitholes host all the time. NCAA milking their last huge revenue ripoff. Hosting by higher seeds may be less money but can you imagine Alfond hosting a regional game? People would pay 100+ a ticket. Club 300+ easy.

Alfond would be nuts. Hope someday we find out
 
How much is it to bid on a regional?
Minimum 150k and the host covers all the expenses. And they get a measly 20 percent and NCAA takes 80 percent profit. There is a reason why the same shitholes host all the time. NCAA milking their last huge revenue ripoff. Hosting by higher seeds may be less money but can you imagine Alfond hosting a regional game? People would pay 100+ a ticket. Club 300+ easy.

The bidding itself is a big expense (at least $150K minimum) but there are also the expenses on top of that. The arena has to be available two or three days before the scheduled games, the host pays for hotels for NCAA officials etc. Also the NCAA sets the prices for the tickets, which is usually exorbitant. The NCAA takes a cut of everything: concessions, parking etc. If Maine had won the right to host the regional in Portland, it would have required at least an average attendance of 4500 just to break even. Had Maine (or UNH) been in the regional, it could have done that. But neither Maine nor UNH qualified that year so they would have been lucky to take a modest loss. More than likely it would have been a financial disaster. Schools like Pedo State can afford it because it's a rounding error for their athletics budgets. Maine can't afford it. Thankfully the bid was rejected by the NCAA and Maine has not bid again.
 
The bidding itself is a big expense (at least $150K minimum) but there are also the expenses on top of that. The arena has to be available two or three days before the scheduled games, the host pays for hotels for NCAA officials etc. Also the NCAA sets the prices for the tickets, which is usually exorbitant. The NCAA takes a cut of everything: concessions, parking etc. If Maine had won the right to host the regional in Portland, it would have required at least an average attendance of 4500 just to break even. Had Maine (or UNH) been in the regional, it could have done that. But neither Maine nor UNH qualified that year so they would have been lucky to take a modest loss. More than likely it would have been a financial disaster. Schools like Pedo State can afford it because it's a rounding error for their athletics budgets. Maine can't afford it. Thankfully the bid was rejected by the NCAA and Maine has not bid again.

They wouldn't give Maine a bid anyway
 
Lots of stuff all over Maine news sources today regarding the formation of a direct payment program to UMaine athletes.....



As it relates to hockey.....some interesting quotes from Ben Barr:

“It’s not really a choice that we have. It’s something we have to do to stay competitive in this new landscape,” UMaine men’s hockey coach Ben Barr said. “It allows the coaches and the programs to go out and work hard towards raising money. And if we do that, it will go directly to our student-athletes in one form or another, whatever that is.”

Barr said UMaine Vice President and Athletic Director Jude Killy has worked hard with university administration “to get this figured out.”

Barr has been working for a couple of years with Bear Down Collective, an NIL vehicle under the leadership of concert promoter Alex Gray and First National Bank Vice President Kristen McAlpine, so he has been involved in fundraising along with Seth Woodcock, the UMaine senior associate athletic for development and capital planning.

Barr said UMaine has a lot to attract a potential student-athlete in addition to financial resources and a scholarship, including a $50 million renovation to the Alfond Arena, the unique energized game night experience at Alfond Arena and a “great league” in Hockey East.

“We have to thrive in this and we should be able to in hockey. We have to absolutely hammer this,” Barr said. “We have so many good things going for us. We weren’t good enough to make the NCAA Tournament this year, but that’s on me and I firmly believe we will fix that.”

“We should be a destination in college hockey,” Barr said. “We may not be in downtown Boston with all that glamor, but if we’re not chasing that to the best of our ability, shame on us.”
 
The bidding itself is a big expense (at least $150K minimum) but there are also the expenses on top of that. The arena has to be available two or three days before the scheduled games, the host pays for hotels for NCAA officials etc. Also the NCAA sets the prices for the tickets, which is usually exorbitant. The NCAA takes a cut of everything: concessions, parking etc. If Maine had won the right to host the regional in Portland, it would have required at least an average attendance of 4500 just to break even. Had Maine (or UNH) been in the regional, it could have done that. But neither Maine nor UNH qualified that year so they would have been lucky to take a modest loss. More than likely it would have been a financial disaster. Schools like Pedo State can afford it because it's a rounding error for their athletics budgets. Maine can't afford it. Thankfully the bid was rejected by the NCAA and Maine has not bid again.
At a high level, that's accurate, however, it's hard to quantify the "boost" to the local economy. Purely looking at it based on ticket sales for the host to break even doesn't paint the whole picture.
 
Back
Top