What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UMaine 25-26: Marques My Word: Back to the Big Time

It's really weird. We've got a whole lot of people thinking it's Maine's birthright to be a top 5-10 program every year, when there was just a 10 year gap of absolute mediocrity. We've got people questioning the character of kids they've never met just based on random rumor and innuendo. I don't know what Sparkee's on about but there's some kind of insinuation that the fans being okay with the team being slightly above .500 is a lack of manhood or something.

Only 16 teams make the NCAA tournament each year, and there are 35-40 programs out there putting an honest effort into it. Some of them are spending a whole lot more money on players than Maine! Not only was Maine mediocre at best, bad at worst, for almost 20 years, but the entire landscape of college athletics just got turned on its head. Maine winning somewhere between 17 and 19 games in one season isn't a disaster.

Some of you act like if Maine isn't prime Walsh-era, 30+ wins, Frozen Four every year there is some malevolent force that we need to root out, be it bad coaching losing the locker room, players not trying their best due to petty interpersonal bullshit, a vague liberal conspiracy that infects junior year goaltenders, or whatever. That's a pretty dark place to live. Sometimes you graduate a ton of talent and even with everyone trying their best and getting along the next season isn't as good!

For those of us who were lucky enough to live through it we need to be thankful for Shawn and the glory days and not have all kinds of angst that they are gone. As you rightly say it’s now been a 20 year stretch where Maine has been roughly a sixth place team and it doesn’t look like that will change any time soon. There is no doubt in my mind Barr and everyone associated with the program is doing everything they can to win, it just isn’t very easy. We’re going to have some good years, bad years, and a lot of average years and people need to accept that.
 
I think the thing we would all like is more transparency on how the program is funded. I think that the $50 million Alfond renovation could have been cut to $40 million with $10 million set aside for the men’s hockey program to be put toward player acquisition and retention. $10 million at 4% interest = $400K without even touching the principle. That buys a few higher end players every season.
 
I think the thing we would all like is more transparency on how the program is funded. I think that the $50 million Alfond renovation could have been cut to $40 million with $10 million set aside for the men’s hockey program to be put toward player acquisition and retention. $10 million at 4% interest = $400K without even touching the principle. That buys a few higher end players every season.

Yes, I agree and I've been on about that, too. To me, though, that's a macro issue with the entire athletic department. Some sort of "what are we doing with Maine athletics in the new landscape?" type of interview or white paper or something would at least level set expectations for us all. Unless he's frustrated to the point that he needs to start airing dirty administrative laundry in public, that's not Ben Barr's place. It's on the athletic director, if not the president.

But at the micro level, sometimes you win 53% of games in a season and it isn't the end of the world.
 
I think the thing we would all like is more transparency on how the program is funded. I think that the $50 million Alfond renovation could have been cut to $40 million with $10 million set aside for the men’s hockey program to be put toward player acquisition and retention. $10 million at 4% interest = $400K without even touching the principle. That buys a few higher end players every season.
How does title IX figure into NIL money given to mens hockey players?
 
How does title IX figure into NIL money given to mens hockey players?
The present federal administration feels not at all. Whether the federal courts would agree is an open question that would be the better part of a decade away from being answered.

Texas Tech isn't exactly equalling out the $20+M it spends on football players on its softball team.
 
Thats kind of what I was wondering about , D1 bball you might even out but football no chance.

I'd forgotten how great olympic hockey was, 2 great games today
 
Thats kind of what I was wondering about , D1 bball you might even out but football no chance.

I'd forgotten how great olympic hockey was, 2 great games today

If Sway isn't playing Team USA is a tough group to root for. I've been anti-Tkachuk since Martin Mercier whipped Keith's ass back in 1990.
 
Back
Top