Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: TV, or not TV, that is the question
Hmm. I'm still only about 3 episodes in (so as soon as I saw that they were halfway I stopped reading for fear of spoilers) so it may go pear-shaped, but the more I watch it the more I like it. It is a scathing parody and it may make people uncomfortable, because like all good parody it isn't just pointing its finger and laughing, it's also burning down the whole support apparatus of fans and press and aesthetics that surrounds its target. As my wife and I were discussing, it's bad for business, if the business is churning out trite, snarky 20-something com-drams, and there are a lot of people invested in keeping that business laying golden eggs.
Put it this way: the NFL network might put on a comedy that mocked a terrible fictitious team, but it wouldn't put on a comedy that mocked the entire sport as inane, its "issues" as affluenza, and its "journalists" as by definition paid PR flacks whose only talent was hanging on the tip of their paymasters.
It's the difference between something safe, like MASH, and something deeply subversive, like Catch-22.
Hmm. I'm still only about 3 episodes in (so as soon as I saw that they were halfway I stopped reading for fear of spoilers) so it may go pear-shaped, but the more I watch it the more I like it. It is a scathing parody and it may make people uncomfortable, because like all good parody it isn't just pointing its finger and laughing, it's also burning down the whole support apparatus of fans and press and aesthetics that surrounds its target. As my wife and I were discussing, it's bad for business, if the business is churning out trite, snarky 20-something com-drams, and there are a lot of people invested in keeping that business laying golden eggs.
Put it this way: the NFL network might put on a comedy that mocked a terrible fictitious team, but it wouldn't put on a comedy that mocked the entire sport as inane, its "issues" as affluenza, and its "journalists" as by definition paid PR flacks whose only talent was hanging on the tip of their paymasters.
It's the difference between something safe, like MASH, and something deeply subversive, like Catch-22.
Last edited: