Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
you'd be in my dreams if you were making me a sandwich
you'd be in my dreams if you were making me a sandwich
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
- Thread starter UMDSimmerdown
- Start date
Dirty
#BanBiddy
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
Charlie Weiss would be in your dreams if he was making you a sandwich.
Charlie Weiss would be in your dreams if he was making you a sandwich.
MinnesotaNorthStar
Minding the gap
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
Charlie Weiss would be eating the sandwich, spilling mustard all over the front of his stupid Notre Dame windbreaker. However, watching him at a Sizzler would be comical
Charlie Weiss would be eating the sandwich, spilling mustard all over the front of his stupid Notre Dame windbreaker. However, watching him at a Sizzler would be comical
uaafanblog
AKA - "Drop The Puck"
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
You're partially wrong and partially right (a state of being I've no doubt you're quite familiar with). He did indeed say "people like you". He also said "your post". In college they teach you about these things call simile and comparisons. Try going sometime. But yes please ... continue to answer for someone else by attempting to make the discussion about me. SlowBoat needs all the help he can get.
You're partially wrong and partially right (a state of being I've no doubt you're quite familiar with). He did indeed say "people like you". He also said "your post". In college they teach you about these things call simile and comparisons. Try going sometime. But yes please ... continue to answer for someone else by attempting to make the discussion about me. SlowBoat needs all the help he can get.
Dirty
#BanBiddy
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
Brent went to UMD, that explains why he didn't learn these things.
Brent went to UMD, that explains why he didn't learn these things.
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
You made the discussion about you. And you are being a complete jackwagon. Poster A stated a thought, which could be a fact. You snarkily commented on it, unnecessarily. Posters B and C called you out, and you claim personal bias.
How about you just let this go, and concentrate on the series at hand, instead of trying to be Mr Internet Hero?
You made the discussion about you. And you are being a complete jackwagon. Poster A stated a thought, which could be a fact. You snarkily commented on it, unnecessarily. Posters B and C called you out, and you claim personal bias.
How about you just let this go, and concentrate on the series at hand, instead of trying to be Mr Internet Hero?
uaafanblog
AKA - "Drop The Puck"
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
So there's that.
Wrong. Bukunin and you did.
Is that like being an ***hole? Because, yeah. That was my intent.
See my original decrial of same. His "thought" was no more relevant than when (in the past on this board) he accused some women of deserving the rapes perpetrated against them.
Unecessary snark? On this board? Puhlease. All snark here is completely necessary.
Yeah. Because nobody here ever answered a post I made simply because it was me authoring it. See, I'm a big enough ***hole to not only attract that sort of thing but answer back as well.
I'm rubber and you're glue ... and exactly who am I going to be a hero to? My throngs of internet fans? LOL ...
So there's that.
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
Uh, you claimed personal bias. That makes it about you. And you succeeded in being an a-hole. Finally, Sloe's post about a suspension IS relevant, since it affects the upcoming game(s). The "rape comment" history is completely non-relevant, and shows that you cannot concentrate on the discussion at hand, which makes you either stupid, and/or an a-hole. Since you already admitted you were trying to be an a-hole, I guess you achieved your goal. Aim high, my good man, aim high.
Uh, you claimed personal bias. That makes it about you. And you succeeded in being an a-hole. Finally, Sloe's post about a suspension IS relevant, since it affects the upcoming game(s). The "rape comment" history is completely non-relevant, and shows that you cannot concentrate on the discussion at hand, which makes you either stupid, and/or an a-hole. Since you already admitted you were trying to be an a-hole, I guess you achieved your goal. Aim high, my good man, aim high.
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
I don't know what you've said over the years, and my post is not based on anything personal. All I saw in your post was mindless lecturing to others about "what is important" when I'm quite sure they can figure it out for themselves.
Well, obviously.
uaafanblog
AKA - "Drop The Puck"
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
Well then my apologies for the incorrect assumption. If it helps, I've updated my status from "registered user" to more accurately reflect my somewhat ignominious identity.
cross cheque
Make the playoffs, not war.
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
Hey, I heard the unbeaten Bulldogs are playing hockey in Grand Forks this weekend against the Sioux. Is this true?
Since UND posters aren't completely clean on this, I'll simply request nicely that whatever MN-UAA lingering John Hill issues remain, along with the standard BC-Maine hatred, be taken out of the UND threads to another location, and leave it at that.
This is going to be a very tough weekend for the Sioux.
First, I've felt all along UMD was the team to beat, and they haven't proven me wrong. They were, and are, my pick for the league title and seem to be playing very well, notwithstanding a somewhat weaker schedule thus far.
My concerns regarding UND have also largely borne true. As I posted last summer, I felt this team would not be as good as the team that failed to get past Yale in the first round of the NCAA's, largely because it was the same team that failed to get past Yale in the first round, minus a couple of key players in VandeVelde and Zajac. We didn't expect the few freshmen to come in and be major contributors, and thus far they haven't, although they've played fine.
UND has struggled at the center position, in my opinion, and that was exacerbated during the second half of Saturday's game when they lost their best center to the DQ. I expect they will be without Mr. Malone this weekend as well, so someone is going to have to step up.
My untrained eye tells me too many players are trying to win games on their own as opposed to playing a team system. We'll see if Hak can get the boys back on track this weekend in a series in which I'd take 3 pts. right now and run.
Hey, I heard the unbeaten Bulldogs are playing hockey in Grand Forks this weekend against the Sioux. Is this true?
Since UND posters aren't completely clean on this, I'll simply request nicely that whatever MN-UAA lingering John Hill issues remain, along with the standard BC-Maine hatred, be taken out of the UND threads to another location, and leave it at that.
This is going to be a very tough weekend for the Sioux.
First, I've felt all along UMD was the team to beat, and they haven't proven me wrong. They were, and are, my pick for the league title and seem to be playing very well, notwithstanding a somewhat weaker schedule thus far.
My concerns regarding UND have also largely borne true. As I posted last summer, I felt this team would not be as good as the team that failed to get past Yale in the first round of the NCAA's, largely because it was the same team that failed to get past Yale in the first round, minus a couple of key players in VandeVelde and Zajac. We didn't expect the few freshmen to come in and be major contributors, and thus far they haven't, although they've played fine.
UND has struggled at the center position, in my opinion, and that was exacerbated during the second half of Saturday's game when they lost their best center to the DQ. I expect they will be without Mr. Malone this weekend as well, so someone is going to have to step up.
My untrained eye tells me too many players are trying to win games on their own as opposed to playing a team system. We'll see if Hak can get the boys back on track this weekend in a series in which I'd take 3 pts. right now and run.
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
I would say they've been a mixed bag.
UND started the season very good on the pp, but of late they've struggled a little. Teams have started to figure out that the Sioux look almost exclusively to score from the blue line, and have really started to pressure our points. They're going to have to do a better job getting some chances down low, back in Ryan Duncan's old kitchen, if they want to free up the points a little more. There have been a lot of shots of late into pk's shin pads and sticks.
Notwithstanding UND's apparent goonery, the Sioux have actually done a very good job of staying out of the box this year. Other than the Maine series, they've only had to kill off 21 pp's in those 6 games, or about 3.5/game. Overall, including Maine, teams have scored on 8 of 40 pp's, which isn't a great kill percentage.
The team has played ok, generally speaking, but I don't think they've really clicked yet like most of fans hope or expect.
I would say they've been a mixed bag.
UND started the season very good on the pp, but of late they've struggled a little. Teams have started to figure out that the Sioux look almost exclusively to score from the blue line, and have really started to pressure our points. They're going to have to do a better job getting some chances down low, back in Ryan Duncan's old kitchen, if they want to free up the points a little more. There have been a lot of shots of late into pk's shin pads and sticks.
Notwithstanding UND's apparent goonery, the Sioux have actually done a very good job of staying out of the box this year. Other than the Maine series, they've only had to kill off 21 pp's in those 6 games, or about 3.5/game. Overall, including Maine, teams have scored on 8 of 40 pp's, which isn't a great kill percentage.
The team has played ok, generally speaking, but I don't think they've really clicked yet like most of fans hope or expect.
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
I would agree with this.
It seems that especially Genoway and Kristo are trying to do too much. I think once the points start to come for them, that they will relax and be able to loosen up on the sticks a bit...
I would agree with this.
It seems that especially Genoway and Kristo are trying to do too much. I think once the points start to come for them, that they will relax and be able to loosen up on the sticks a bit...
UMDBulldogHockeyIsKing
Customized for Her Pleasure
Re: tUMD @ UND: Novermber 5-6, 2010
The sandwich would never get there. Weis would eat it first. So you're dead wrong.
The sandwich would never get there. Weis would eat it first. So you're dead wrong.