Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: The States: Why does Minnesota wanna be Kansas?
He missed his calling as a theologian.
“Arian race”
He missed his calling as a theologian.
“Arian race”
I find his assertion that his account was hacked totally believable. I'm sure he was also suffering from heat exhaustion.
To paraphrase a comedic masterpieceAnd acid reflux.
<img src="https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2014/10/Screen_Shot_2014_10_22_at_4.34.59_PM/lead_720_405.png" height="300"/>
According to Axios, Trump’s 2020 campaign manager, Brad Parscale, is targeting two other blue states for victory in the next election: Minnesota and Colorado. As with Michigan and New Mexico, one of those seems more likely than the other to go in Trump’s favor.
But there are also national trends at play that influence individual states. If we factor out the national shifts, we can get a different sense for how the states voted in 2016, relative to years past. In other words, we can see how heavily each state voted for the Democrat or the Republican in each presidential election relative to how the country on the whole did.
In doing so, we see two things. First, that Minnesota voted more Republican in 2016 than the nation on the whole, a big shift from 2012.
Oh lord I see the locals are starting the "This is the election we go Red" crap earlier than usual. If Trump wastes time here it will be tantamount to Clinton wasting time in Arizona. Last election he had the best possible chance because we were a Bernie State who disliked Clinton and he still lost. Yes it was close but it wont be that close again unless the Dems put up someone as unlikeable. Trump needs to hold the states he flipped last election of Minnesota and Colorado wont matter.
What again goes before the fall?![]()
What again goes before the fall?
Pretty much this. I'd be more worried about the governor race if Walz wins the primary.Oh lord I see the locals are starting the "This is the election we go Red" crap earlier than usual. If Trump wastes time here it will be tantamount to Clinton wasting time in Arizona. Last election he had the best possible chance because we were a Bernie State who disliked Clinton and he still lost. Yes it was close but it wont be that close again unless the Dems put up someone as unlikeable. Trump needs to hold the states he flipped last election of Minnesota and Colorado wont matter.
I'm pretty sure it's just a way to get the Dems to expend resources on defense. But then again I convinced myself that's what Clinton doing by "expanding the map" late in the 2016 cycle.
In retrospect, I honestly don't know what she was doing. Was the idea to run up the score to create a larger "mandate"? Even if that worked, how could that have helped her? The GOP had already separated itself from those considerations and committed to complete obstruction during Obama. She could have swept the entire EC and still no Republican would have governed for the good of the country.
I think this was the greatest mistake of many. I will never understand why she bothered with Georgia and Arizona and there must have been some real idiots telling her to do so.
No, I get all that; my question is: what did she think she was doing? I could see it as a fake out, but I can't see any sense at all in actually doing what she appears to have actually done.
Pretty much this. I'd be more worried about the governor race if Walz wins the primary.
No, I get all that; my question is: what did she think she was doing? I could see it as a fake out, but I can't see any sense at all in actually doing what she appears to have actually done.
No, I get all that; my question is: what did she think she was doing? I could see it as a fake out, but I can't see any sense at all in actually doing what she appears to have actually done.
I think he's the favorite but my concern would be his economic plans (how committed he actually is to some of this stuff like inner city school funding, or even an economic plan for the more rural strongholds you mention in Duluth/Rochester), being non committal on stuff like medicare for all, no stance on marijuana, and his receiving of NRA funding not playing as well with younger voters. Obviously he's better than Pawlenty on the majority of issues but I don't see a ton of people being energized by what he's peddling.Why? Walz plays very well in the Cities and in he other Dem strongholds and none of the current crop of GOPers will be able to topple him. He isnt my pick by a longshot but he would have to tank in MSP for the GOP to have a chance. The only marquee name the GOP has is PAw and MSP hasnt forgotten how bad his policies destroyed them for 8 years.
In Minnesota the key to the Governorship is The Twin Cities, Rochester and Duluth. Walz will have little issue with any of those areas.