aparch
Acetaminamerican
Correct, in that it's still in the design phase. But it's for a proposes link from the Pacific port of Mazatlan to Winnipeg.
it appears that existing rail traffic is funneled toward the middle of Mexico (San Luis) then North, which is why Texas is the brunt of the crossings. The other main line follows the Pacific coast to Tijuana.
The proposed route appears to use rail lines between the two big routes and go from Salamanca to Torreon to Ciudad Juarez.
The No-Texas alternate route looks to get to that point, then swing 20 miles west around the tip of El Paso and fall more in line with Las Cruces NM.
In fact, a quick trip to Google Maps of the area shows BNSF with a huge yard in Santa Teresa. Depending on who they get trackage right agreements from, they can just use BNSF routing up to Albuquerque, then to Kansas City, then to Winnipeg. UPRR would be more direct from El Paso to Kansas City.
I can guarantee you that UPRR, or any of them, would absolutely build new lines if it meant they were able to speed up shipping. In fact, I've watched them hold up a federal interstate project AND an airport expansion because they "might expand a rail yard."
it appears that existing rail traffic is funneled toward the middle of Mexico (San Luis) then North, which is why Texas is the brunt of the crossings. The other main line follows the Pacific coast to Tijuana.
The proposed route appears to use rail lines between the two big routes and go from Salamanca to Torreon to Ciudad Juarez.
The No-Texas alternate route looks to get to that point, then swing 20 miles west around the tip of El Paso and fall more in line with Las Cruces NM.
In fact, a quick trip to Google Maps of the area shows BNSF with a huge yard in Santa Teresa. Depending on who they get trackage right agreements from, they can just use BNSF routing up to Albuquerque, then to Kansas City, then to Winnipeg. UPRR would be more direct from El Paso to Kansas City.
I can guarantee you that UPRR, or any of them, would absolutely build new lines if it meant they were able to speed up shipping. In fact, I've watched them hold up a federal interstate project AND an airport expansion because they "might expand a rail yard."
Last edited: