Re: The States: North Dakota is Still the Worst
So it's theoretical vs applied? OK, I get you.
Hey, the world needs engineers too. There are two disciplines without engineering: philosophy and theology. They both have a lot of problems.
That's how I generally distinguish the two.
1. Someone sees a problem or need
2. That someone brings it to a scientist or engineer and asks, "How can we fill this need?"
3. Scientists determine if it's possible
4. Scientists (sometimes different, sometimes the same as in step 3) synthesize the chemical
5. Engineers determine if that synthesis is possible at large scale or create equipment to make it possible
6. Financial team (though usually it seems to be the engineer

) determines if it would make money
7. Management says yes or no
8. Engineers (working with team of scientists) scale from lab to pilot
9. Repeat: Feasible? Profitable?
10. Engineers (working with fewer scientists) scale from pilot to production
11. Management downsizes company, fires important people, and goes for a nice dip in the money bin
Scientists come up with the idea
Engineers make it profitable
Management and finance wander around in the flower fields
I'll give you one guess on who gets paid the most and the least