What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

If you still had 3 kids under 21, you and your spouse would also be some number of years younger.

Just saying, if you play with the scenario in an effort to make your premium higher, it's not shocking that your premium would be higher.
I put in 35 as the age of me and my spouse, in my example.
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

In contrast, the Federal Employees Health Benefits is a great deal.

As a retiree, I'm paying close to $400/mo for Aetna family plan (Uncle Sam picks up a portion). Next open season my wife and I will get single plans saving us $50/mo total and lowering our catastrophic from $10K to $5K each.

Why can't Uncle Sam do the same thing for non Feds?
 
In contrast, the Federal Employees Health Benefits is a great deal.

As a retiree, I'm paying close to $400/mo for Aetna family plan (Uncle Sam picks up a portion). Next open season my wife and I will get single plans saving us $50/mo total and lowering our catastrophic from $10K to $5K each.

Why can't Uncle Sam do the same thing for non Feds?

Because socialism, and I'm only half kidding.

You're right, it could. But then you go and vote for the party that will never let it happen.
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

Because socialism, and I'm only half kidding.

You're right, it could. But then you go and vote for the party that will never let it happen.

Irony at its finest :D
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

What part of 37% don't you get? And that was just last year.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/u...es-seek-big-rate-increases-for-2016.html?_r=0

Call BS all you want.

Of course Minnesota saw health care premium increases in 2015.

The state had the cheapest health care premiums - #1 - in the country in 2014. http://khn.org/news/10-least-expensive-health-insurance-markets-in-us/ And Minnesota has the best quality of health care in the country every year. In years past, state insurance companies mispriced their services due to the exchange expecting hot competition. And because big insurance companies can't compare on price with smaller insurance companies like UCare...they're withdrawing from the exchange where people can shop side by side.

(In 2014) The lowest monthly silver premium in the country is offered in the Minneapolis-St. Paul region, where a 40-year-old will pay $154 a month for a PreferredOne plan. Just across the Wisconsin border, that same level plan — but with a different insurer and other doctors and hospitals — costs nearly three times as much.

Do you shop for insurance on MNSure every year? I do and my insurance premiums went down last year.
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

Handy & uno

I've written my congressman (and soon to be Senator) Chris VanHollen about that very thing.

"Thank you for your letter..."
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

Handy & uno

I've written my congressman (and soon to be Senator) Chris VanHollen about that very thing.

"Thank you for your letter..."

I've written both my Senators about this debacle of a law. Especially for the Middle Class who always takes everything in the ***.
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

(In 2014) The lowest monthly silver premium in the country is offered in the Minneapolis-St. Paul region, where a 40-year-old will pay $154 a month for a PreferredOne plan. Just across the Wisconsin border, that same level plan — but with a different insurer and other doctors and hospitals — costs nearly three times as much.

How are they gonna charge full rates west of the St. Croix? Nobody would be able to pay.

The rates are also skewed by the fact that so many demented and diseased Minnesotans think they are "just fine." Look no further that this forum for proof of that.
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

I've written both my Senators about this debacle of a law. Especially for the Middle Class who always takes everything in the ***.

I'd love for you to share that letter with us. The over/under on references to conspiracy theories must be a dozen, and that's assuming your letter was only one page long. :D
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

How are they gonna charge full rates west of the St. Croix? Nobody would be able to pay.

The rates are also skewed by the fact that so many demented and diseased Minnesotans think they are "just fine." Look no further that this forum for proof of that.

If you equate "just fine" with "we are better than you always" ok.
 
If you equate "just fine" with "we are better than you always" ok.

I'd say that's the definition of narcissistic personality disorder! If Martin Skhreli, BS can diagnose Hillary with Parkinson's just by observation, I would say Fade, MS can make that call, and it's got more weight. :D ;)
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

(In 2014) The lowest monthly silver premium in the country is offered in the Minneapolis-St. Paul region, where a 40-year-old will pay $154 a month for a PreferredOne plan. Just across the Wisconsin border, that same level plan — but with a different insurer and other doctors and hospitals — costs nearly three times as much.
Well, on the correct side of the St. Croix we don't stick our arms in the wood chipper to see what happens...like so many of my western Wisconsin friends like to do after a couple Leinenkugels.
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

Scoobs can't see your link but Obama claimed premiums would be $2,500 lower than they would have been had the law not been enacted, not that you'd be paying $2,500 less than before. For someone who's a supposed liberal you sure do parrot conservative talking points a lot.
Uh-huh. He sure forgot to be explicit about that if that's what he really meant. Classic bait-and-switch.
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

Uh-huh. He sure forgot to be explicit about that if that's what he really meant. Classic bait-and-switch.

Yeah, the president and his party sold it as an immediate reduction in overall premiums paid once the benefits began to kick in AND a downward bend in the future premium rate increases.
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

What do you know, a company is using bureaucracies about health created over the past 125 years to create a monopoly on an emergency injector. And yet, a bunch of you wackos want to put your entire trust with health and well-being decisions into these same bureaucracies...
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

I have determined based on my own experience and what I have read and all the insurance companies that are bowing out that all this law was in the long run was a middle class tax increase to help pay for the poor and uninsured.
 
Re: The PPACA Thread Part III - Let's have a healthy debate!

I have determined based on my own experience and what I have read and all the insurance companies that are bowing out that all this law was in the long run was a middle class tax increase to help pay for the poor and uninsured.

You didn't see that from the start? Now ask the younger generation (just older than 26 when the law passed) how they feel about the older generations' situation in this law, about how the young had their premiums jacked up while the old had theirs reduced - at least initially, then they went up with everyone else's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top