Re: The PPACA Implementation Phase II - Love it or Lose it!
But Lynah, why would you shell out 500M bucks for a law that's going to fail in 3,2,1.....wait, 3,2,1...wait again....
I mean, if the law is unstainable, is this not wasted money????
As I've told you before and don't mind repeating, the problem with your theory is that it places zero value on having insurance. In your view, a person would pay a 200 dollar fine instead of a 201 dollar premium because that means an extra buck;
In reality, few people (outside of maybe libertarians) think this way. That's why in Massachusetts, young people got the insurance instead of paying the fine.
I have no idea how you're interpreting that as an "endorsement" of Obamacare. If there are 10 milllion "young invincibles" out there (there are probably more) that "ought to be" paying $1500 per year in premiums, that's $15 BILLION in free money - year after year - for those companies. Spending $500M once to get $15B in perpetuity is just a smart business decision out of self interest, nothing more.
But Lynah, why would you shell out 500M bucks for a law that's going to fail in 3,2,1.....wait, 3,2,1...wait again....
I mean, if the law is unstainable, is this not wasted money????
At least until people are priced out and just decide to pay the tax. Heck, that's what my generation is doing. Ever since this was enacted, I saw this as exactly what you wanted: a pathway to single payer with a backdoor tax.
As I've told you before and don't mind repeating, the problem with your theory is that it places zero value on having insurance. In your view, a person would pay a 200 dollar fine instead of a 201 dollar premium because that means an extra buck;
In reality, few people (outside of maybe libertarians) think this way. That's why in Massachusetts, young people got the insurance instead of paying the fine.
Last edited: