Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
The difference between your opinion and mine is mine is supported by data.
The difference between your opinion and mine is mine is supported by data.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
- Thread starter unofan
- Start date
- Status
Jimjamesak
Already insane, UAA making it worse
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
It's now time to play "Let's see how long it takes the 5th Circuit to * this all up!"
It's now time to play "Let's see how long it takes the 5th Circuit to * this all up!"
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
Man, that circuit is old. There are two Carter appointees on it!
Man, that circuit is old. There are two Carter appointees on it!
Jimjamesak
Already insane, UAA making it worse
And, since it consists of Louisana, Texas, and Mississippi, it's got plenty of people likely to uphold a ban.
Jimjamesak
Already insane, UAA making it worse
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
A contractual agreement between two people.
I agree, not hard at all.
A contractual agreement between two people.
I agree, not hard at all.
St. Clown
Ideas Posted are Likely Not My Own
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
It's the process of choosing a person who is a (hopefully) non-blood relation, this will be the person who gets to decide when to pull your plug once you're in a vegetative state.
It's the process of choosing a person who is a (hopefully) non-blood relation, this will be the person who gets to decide when to pull your plug once you're in a vegetative state.
Any exceptions?
FadeToBlack&Gold
No Quarter for Fascists
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
Yes. In Wisconsin, one of the parties can be a dead deer.
Yes. In Wisconsin, one of the parties can be a dead deer.
Jimjamesak
Already insane, UAA making it worse
Consent and blood relation first cousin or closer.
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
I wonder if that only holds for heterosexual marriages, as the reason for the ban is the genetic risk associated with inbreeding.....??
I wonder if that only holds for heterosexual marriages, as the reason for the ban is the genetic risk associated with inbreeding.....??
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
Keep those relationships extramarital, they're more exciting that way.
Yes. In Wisconsin, one of the parties can be a dead deer.
Keep those relationships extramarital, they're more exciting that way.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Jimjamesak
Already insane, UAA making it worse
Well, considering we don't need to distinguish between heterosexual and homosexual marriage since it's just marriage, I'd say no.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
Also, the incest taboo is less about inbreeding than power relations. It's about preventing dads and uncles from driving off teenage boy competition so they can keep the teen girls to themselves, like Heinlein used to fantasize about and these guys actually do.
Also, the incest taboo is less about inbreeding than power relations. It's about preventing dads and uncles from driving off teenage boy competition so they can keep the teen girls to themselves, like Heinlein used to fantasize about and these guys actually do.
bro and sis good or double plus ungood?
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
Really, just ask the "progressives" how they want it defined at the moment.
Didn't realize I was married to the guy who I hired to do some work on my front yard, as I signed a contractual agreement with him. I better be careful of entering into contractual agreements from now on!
Really, just ask the "progressives" how they want it defined at the moment.
Jimjamesak
Already insane, UAA making it worse
Holy hyperbole Batman! I don't think Evel Knievel could make that jump.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: The Power of SCOTUS V: The Final Frontier
Double plus ungood. Older bro locking up hot young sis is bad for business. The whole point of 18 (well, 13) year old girls is to sell them to the gross, old landowner in the next valley, to increase your holdings and prevent fighting. If you smoke your own stash, you lose your bargaining chips and everybody winds up getting killed off in feuds.
Just think of the South without a civilized (i.e., northern) legal system: daughters are objects to buy stuff with; sons are weapons to steal the stuff of people who don't trade with you.
Double plus ungood. Older bro locking up hot young sis is bad for business. The whole point of 18 (well, 13) year old girls is to sell them to the gross, old landowner in the next valley, to increase your holdings and prevent fighting. If you smoke your own stash, you lose your bargaining chips and everybody winds up getting killed off in feuds.
Just think of the South without a civilized (i.e., northern) legal system: daughters are objects to buy stuff with; sons are weapons to steal the stuff of people who don't trade with you.
Last edited:
- Status