What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

Pink Pony said:
But the second time around two trips to Alaska and one to Alabama looked better then going to Colorado.
Click to expand...

The second time around, there were no entry fees and when NMU rejoined the league it was set to be UAA, Mankato, Bemidji, St Cloud, Tech and NMU. Then St Cloud skipped out the back door and the scramble that ensued added LSSU, Ferris, Bowling Green and Huntsville.

The two trips to Alaska and one to Huntsville are partially funded by the host schools. Denver & CC offered no financial inducements. Those Colorado trips are among the reasons NMU left the WCHA in the first place.
 
Last edited:
davyd83 said:
The second time around, there were no entry fees and when NMU rejoined the league it was set to be UAA, Mankato, Bemidji, St Cloud, Tech and NMU. Then St Cloud skipped out the back door and the scramble that ensued added LSSU, Ferris, Bowling Green and Huntsville.

The two trips to Alaska and one to Huntsville are partially funded by the host schools. Denver & CC offered no financial inducements. Those Colorado trips are among the reasons NMU left the WCHA in the first place.
Click to expand...

The WCHA was NMUs only choice the second time around.

That or they could have joined the CCHA display case at BGSU.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

davyd83 said:
That's incorrect. They could have stayed with LSSU, Ferris, BG and Fairbanks, added Huntsville and continued the CCHA.
Click to expand...

Boy, a six-team league with Fairbanks and Huntsville and 16 non-conference games would've been rough. We certainly would've been happy to be a part of it, but that would have been a very weird league.

GFM
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

gfmorris said:
Boy, a six-team league with Fairbanks and Huntsville and 16 non-conference games would've been rough. We certainly would've been happy to be a part of it, but that would have been a very weird league.

GFM
Click to expand...
They likely would have had to bring in a couple of Atlantic Hockey schools to make it more viable.
 
gfmorris said:
Boy, a six-team league with Fairbanks and Huntsville and 16 non-conference games would've been rough. We certainly would've been happy to be a part of it, but that would have been a very weird league.

GFM
Click to expand...
18 NC games, the games in Fairbanks wouldn't have counted.
 
gfmorris said:
Boy, a six-team league with Fairbanks and Huntsville and 16 non-conference games would've been rough. We certainly would've been happy to be a part of it, but that would have been a very weird league.

GFM
Click to expand...

Among those left in the CCHA, there were talks with Robert Morris, Mercyhurst, Niagara, even Buffalo. LSSU and UAF set their sights on the WCHA. When talks with those "Eastern" schools didn't pan out, then the full scale merger between the leftovers came to fruition.
 
Last edited:
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

davyd83 said:
Among those left in the CCHA, there were talks with Robert Morris, Mercyhurst, Niagara, even Buffalo. LSSU and UAF set their sights on the WCHA. When talks with those "Eastern" schools didn't pan out, then the full scale merger between the leftovers came to fruition.
Click to expand...


Lucky for Northern because they would have been in a league with less then 6 teams.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

Jimjamesak said:
18 NC games, the games in Fairbanks wouldn't have counted.
Click to expand...

16. You'd have been playing a 20-game conference slate, because no way are some teams signing up to go to Alaska twice in a year every other year in a six-team league. But everyone would've gotten the Alaska games exempt, which means that everyone would have had 14 NC dates + 2 Alaska dates. No way you're getting 16 NC dates in this climate. When UAH played in the CHA, UAH played the following number of games: 31, 34, 37, 35, 31, 32, 34, 36 (counting an NCAA game), 31, 30, and 33 (counting an NCAA game). All of those game totals come with CHA tournament appearances in them, and everyone got in the tournament, and UAH was often in the title game (six times in 11 seasons). A six-team league is untenable, and that doesn't include the fact that there would be concerns about LSSU and UAH dropping their program.

We've seen the CHA fail. No, collapsing the CCHA was going to happen unless there was a mass defection of AHA schools. If you bring CC, NU, RMU, MC, and maybe RIT (doubtful as they play without scholarships), and then you take UConn to HE, you've gone from killing the CCHA to killing AHA. Now, maybe that's a mercy killing, but as an alumnus and fan of a program that was nearly felled by the conference alignment stuff, I'm pretty darn sensitive to it.

GFM
 
Pink Pony said:
Turned out to be a big mistake by not joining the WCHA back then.
Click to expand...

A $200,000 entry fee and no revenue from the Final Five for two years (the length of time before the WCHA was imploded), yep that sure was a mistake on NMU's part. :rolleyes:
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

davyd83 said:
St Cloud leaving after pledging their commitment to the WCHA paved the way for the rest of the former CCHA members to join the WCHA.
Click to expand...

St. Cloud's groveling to get into the NCHC, after their President adamantly and publicly declared they would not have accepted any offer to join, was by far the most laughable and embarrassing part of the whole shakeout. :D
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

St Cloud was the worst no doubt, but WMU wasn't far behind.

Also the reasons why UND left are not just one thing. It was a number of things and the small programs were having a say. One thing UND didn't like was the way the votes were going and what they felt like they were giving up monetarily what with that big rink. I can't see them suddenly saying to the smaller programs, "ok you can come back", unless there is some change and they have a bigger say financially.

I also think that reality has hit and the nacho is assessing the fallout financially. I'd be real surprised if they met the goals they set for themselves.

This shake up has proved one thing, If you compare how things are right now vs how things will be in the future with some proposed change or other, it might not come out like you want it to.
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

Conference realignment talk makes my head spin :mad:

Honestly, I'd be really peeved if we go back to something that is very similar to what we had... This would further prove the whole "if it ain't broke, DON'T FIX IT" line of thinking :rolleyes:
 
Re: The New WCHA, 2014 Offseason: See-ya, Bruce

North Dakota and Denver thought they were bigger than they really were. They got tired of being on equal status with the small schools. They conned Miami, UMD, UNO, and CC into believing they'd be forming this Super Conference with Notre Dame and TV money and everything was gold.

Truth was Notre Dame reminded them what real power is and put DU and NoDak in their place over ND's own TV deal. They thought they could hardball Notre Dame thinking they had nowhere to go. Hockey East took on Notre Dame TV deal and all, DU and NoDak went scrambling for two more teams, got a lame TV deal, and the rest of the schools ended up on the Island of Misfits.
 
Jimjamesak said:
North Dakota and Denver thought they were bigger than they really were. They got tired of being on equal status with the small schools. They conned Miami, UMD, UNO, and CC into believing they'd be forming this Super Conference with Notre Dame and TV money and everything was gold.

Truth was Notre Dame reminded them what real power is and put DU and NoDak in their place over ND's own TV deal. They thought they could hardball Notre Dame thinking they had nowhere to go. Hockey East took on Notre Dame TV deal and all, DU and NoDak went scrambling for two more teams, got a lame TV deal, and the rest of the schools ended up on the Island of Misfits.
Click to expand...

The really ironic thing is nobody on the national sports scene gives a flying **** about UND or DU athletics. Notre Dame, on the other hand....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top