Re: The Medical Thread: We're experts on everything else; why not?
Clearly a one-sided report, with Mayo declining to respond, but interesting nonetheless.
Family says Mayo was trying to abduct their daughter.
Although I do not have any direct knowledge of this patient (and full disclosure I have several colleagues and friends at Mayo), I can say that there are many errors in this report that I can say with pretty high certainty. Some may know I am critical of some of Mayo's practices but I can assure you that they are more than capable of following standard of care for this type of patient and unless there is convincing evidence otherwise, I would assume they did everything to the best of their ability.
I do not have the time right now to go into it deeply (busy inpatient service right now) but off the top I can say this patient was not on a neurology service, but a neurosurgery service. Frequently confused but very different. Aneurysms and their subsequent subarachnoid hemorrhage is managed by neurosurgeons, with possibly neurology as a consult to help with the almost inevitable seizures. The neurosurgeons would be the ones continuing the opiates.
These type of patients are literally the sickest people in the hospital for the first 2-3 weeks after rupture (as long as the surgeons can secure the aneurysm) but if you get them through that, they are the type of people that will walk back into your ICU in a year to thank you.
Briefly on the transfer, often you cannot transfer a patient because of insurance reasons. There are regulations that you cannot transfer a patient to a "less capable" hospital. For instance, if you transfer from a primary hospital to a tertiary care hospital, the insurance will not cover transfer out because by definition the tertiary care facility can offer every available treatment. Mayo is often referred to as a "quaternary care" facility (particularly for neuro related cases) so they likely have trouble fulfilling transfer requests.
I may add more later in the week but the tl;dr version is that there are enough clear, easy enough to correct errors throughout this entire piece that I seriously question the accuracy of anything said in it.