FadeToBlack&Gold
8647
It's also unscientific. So-called "fetal heartbeats" don't even emanate from a working heart - 6 weeks is much too soon for organs to have formed.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
The "I Can't Believe There's No Abortion Thread" Part Deux: Electric Boogaloo
- Thread starter MissThundercat
- Start date
- Status
It's also unscientific. So-called "fetal heartbeats" don't even emanate from a working heart - 6 weeks is much too soon for organs to have formed.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health...aign=news&utm_id=43048501&orgid=201&utm_att1=
Yeah, about that Texas "life of the mother" exemption.
You "totally reasonable, just asking questions, everything seems fine" middle grounders can get fucked.
Read the whole article please. There is no middle ground on this. Either women have bodily autonomy or they don't.
Yeah, about that Texas "life of the mother" exemption.
You "totally reasonable, just asking questions, everything seems fine" middle grounders can get fucked.
Read the whole article please. There is no middle ground on this. Either women have bodily autonomy or they don't.
aparch
Well-known member
Quoting this because I read the same article and just came to post it myself. I couldn't agree more with you Swansong.
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Registered User
Articles like that mean nothing to the scum who argue that these laws don’t really hurt people
No, no - people definitely got hurt, but it was those stupid doctors' faults for making bad decisions because they were needlessly worried about things that couldn't possibly happen to them (lawsuits, lost licenses, criminal charges, firing, etc). Why on *earth* could those doctors be so foolish to be worried about those things in this clear-cut, black-and-white case of a medical emergency? C'mon doctors - do your jobs!
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
https://twitter.com/JoeNBC/status/1551901938358407169
Seems the WSJ has evidence Roberts wanted to keep Roe v. Wade and was lobbying and the leaker was a Con (as most of us guessed) who did it to basically stop his actions.
Seems the WSJ has evidence Roberts wanted to keep Roe v. Wade and was lobbying and the leaker was a Con (as most of us guessed) who did it to basically stop his actions.
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
Listen, I'm sure if the doctor just explained the situation to the review board made up of Louie Gohmert, David Allen West, and Chip Roy they would have listened carefully to the doctor's explanation and sided with the doctor.
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Registered User
Imma guess if the investigation uncovers it’s was ginni or another mouthbreather, we won’t hear about it
Deutsche Gopher Fan
Registered User
He’s wrong. There are men who like sleeping with fat women. I know this because someone knocked up Elise
ScoobyDoo
NPC
So, like everyone figured except FOX and FOX will never report the truth. Funny the WSJ did. They're a Murdoch company.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
WSJ has a decent firewall between news and editorial. It's not great, but it's not as bad as Fox.
WSJ has to worry because it makes its bones from financially savvy people and they need reality. Fox it doesn't matter because none of their viewers amount to anything, and so they demand, and Fox can deliver, Mussolini cosplay.
Last edited:
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
NC introduces bill to punish abortion with death penalty.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
WSJ Editorial came out against Trump for 1/6 just recently. I think half of Murdoch (the ones that arent based on Roman on Succession) want DeSantis.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Desantis is Trump without saying it all out loud. There's literally no difference.
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
You understand I am not a Murdoch right?
There is a difference to them...DeSantis is more in control than Trump is. Trump loved Faux except if they looked at him sideways for half a second then he turned on them. (same with all Murdoch owned medias) DeSantis will stay loyal.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
He'll stay loyal because they say so? He's gone after corporate America with both barrels. I fail to see how he's a better option to the corpie billionaire class than Trump.
With the garnish that you’re allowed, nay encouraged, to shoot abortion doctors on sight:
”Any person has the right to defend his or her own life or the life of another person, even by the use of deadly force if necessary, from willful destruction by another person.”
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
No he will stay loyal cause the alternative is he has no way to maintain his audience. He has no charisma, he needs them to sell his bs. Trump never did...
DeSantis doesn't have the grip on his "fans" like Trump did. Trump can win without Faux DeSantis can't. Sime Math.
- Status