OnMAA
Vort Doen.....Heija Heija Heija
Re: This weeks Poll update post - Oct 18 Week 3
Re: This weeks Poll update post - Oct 18 Week 3
Thanks for the note. Corrected the comment.
I did consider moving UMD and BU ahead of the Hurst, but decided against it, based on the dominating wins by Hurst in their other games this year.
You are right, without a computer and deep stats, pretty hard to a do a top ten. Many teams have one loss. As I indicated before, found the Rutter ranking to be pretty reliable, but this early in the season, hard to count on, specially with the Ivy schools (In this case Cornell and Harvard) starting three weeks later than everyone else. I would not be shocked, if every team has at least three losses by the time we get to the playoffs. It will make for a great competition down the stretch, and a real interesting debate on who should get the non-auto bids.
Re: This weeks Poll update post - Oct 18 Week 3
Your comment has BC ahead of Minn, but that isn't reflected in your ranking.
Thanks for the note. Corrected the comment.
On the basis of performance alone, BU and UMD deserve to be ahead of MC (both have a better "best win" and a less damaging loss.
I did consider moving UMD and BU ahead of the Hurst, but decided against it, based on the dominating wins by Hurst in their other games this year.
Of course, this is a poll, not a computer ranking, so it will contain a greater amount of personal perception of a team's potential.
You are right, without a computer and deep stats, pretty hard to a do a top ten. Many teams have one loss. As I indicated before, found the Rutter ranking to be pretty reliable, but this early in the season, hard to count on, specially with the Ivy schools (In this case Cornell and Harvard) starting three weeks later than everyone else. I would not be shocked, if every team has at least three losses by the time we get to the playoffs. It will make for a great competition down the stretch, and a real interesting debate on who should get the non-auto bids.
Last edited: