Re: The 2018 My Team Got the Shaft from the NCAA Thread
Your argument about "one game" would argue there should be no tournament whatsoever. After all, a "better" team might lose to an "inferior" team in a first round game.
The ideal situation would be to allow each conference two bids - one for the RS champ and one for the tournament champ. If the two happened to be the same team, guarantee that team a first round bye and allow the NCAA to select an extra team. Of course, this would require expansion of the bracket, so it won't happen. (This is the way the NCAA used to allocate teams in the twelve team DI hockey tournament until the traditional 4 conference alignment was broken up and the new conferences (like the AHA) meant that there weren't enough slots available. With 4 conferences and 8 slots there were 4 at large bids. Then, along came the (then) MAAC and continuing with the system would have left only two at large bids.
OK, so why not just forget the RS entirely, and play that weekend tournament in the first place? Sure would save a lot of travel expenses, and that last game of 3 is all that matters, anyway...![]()
Your argument about "one game" would argue there should be no tournament whatsoever. After all, a "better" team might lose to an "inferior" team in a first round game.
The ideal situation would be to allow each conference two bids - one for the RS champ and one for the tournament champ. If the two happened to be the same team, guarantee that team a first round bye and allow the NCAA to select an extra team. Of course, this would require expansion of the bracket, so it won't happen. (This is the way the NCAA used to allocate teams in the twelve team DI hockey tournament until the traditional 4 conference alignment was broken up and the new conferences (like the AHA) meant that there weren't enough slots available. With 4 conferences and 8 slots there were 4 at large bids. Then, along came the (then) MAAC and continuing with the system would have left only two at large bids.