Once again, no Gronk, No Amendola, Pats D will have to be huge to win against Atlanta
Throwing to him isn't the issue, catching it isPssst. Throw it to Kenbrell. A lot.![]()
Throwing to him isn't the issue, catching it is
He didn't get the nickname Dropkins for no reasonHe can catch; see last week.![]()
He didn't get the nickname Dropkins for no reason. he looked good last week so hopefully he has turned the corner. In all fairness Brady hasn't looked that good in any game
Never seen double coverage like the Pats put on Gonzalez in the last series. A linebacker on each shoulder, and don't even let him get off the line. Almost looked like two offensive linemen double teaming a pass rusher. Of course that means that someone has to cover a wide receiver one on one, and thank goodness they've got someone who can do that.
Gronk?I agree, the novelty was noted, I don't think I've ever seen that tactic and it <b>might be that he is the only guy in the league you'd do that against</b> but it was worth it...nobody could cover him it seemed. Or, should I say, even when they covered him he still made huge plays. So, keep him within 5 yards of the LOS and you can do as you please. That seemed to disrupt the timing of plays and the QB progression...without that safety blanket they only had Julio Jones and White!!
Atlanta is one of the better pass catching teams, especially on really good coverage... a few reminded me of some of the Giants' catches in games that will not be mentioned.
Gronk?
A porous OL and all receivers that drop more than catch. Dropkins, Dropson, Amendroppa, Dropman. It does not look like a good year, barring any major additions. For all that, there were a few times where they should have scored the tying TD but odd things happened. The D looks all right, although losing Vince hurts like hell.
Either that, or the Bungles are a **** good team. They did come to play today.
Probably will be 4-2 with Miami next week, after the game with the Saints.