Re: St. Cloud State at Alaska-Anchorage - Hoping Not For a Split
Show me where anything I said could be so pathetically misconstrued as to indicate such a connotation.
The ONLY phrase that remotely approaches any such thing was "I wouldn't be surprised" ... Here are some other things that wouldn't surprise me.
I wouldn't be surprised to learn that your father beat your mother.
I wouldn't be surprised if you had ambiguous genitalia.
I wouldn't be surprised to hear that you regularly dine on horse droppings.
I wouldn't be surprised if you couldn't find your food stamps hidden under the soap.
I wouldn't be surprised if you had a cleft palette.
I wouldn't be surprised to read that your mother had secret photos of you engaged in zoophilia.
I wouldn't be surprised if I learned that you stood behind archery targets as a child.
I wouldn't be surprised you were the guy that ran for homecoming queen at SCSU.
I wouldn't be surprised that someone knocking on your cranium would be answered with bell-like sounds.
I wouldn't be surprised to find your picture next to drooler in the dictionary.
See .. um; I'm not easily surprised. At this point though, I would be surprised if you don't respond with something stupid.
Great, I don't have to point it out for you. It was the "I wouldn't be surprised" part.
sur·prise
noun /sə(r)ˈprīz/
surprises, plural
An
unexpected or astonishing event, fact, or thing
- the announcement was a complete surprise
A feeling of mild astonishment or shock caused by something
unexpected
- much to her surprise, she'd missed him
Denoting something made, done, or happening
unexpectedly
- a surprise attack
Denoting a class of complex methods of change-ringing
- surprise major
Above I pasted some definitions of surprise. Multiple definitions referring to a reaction to something
unexpected. If your expectation is that UAA will not sweep this series, then you
would be surprised if they did because to you that would be unexpected. So if you say it
wouldn't surprise you if UAA swept, that means it
isn't unexpected, which means you do think it is reasonable that UAA can sweep.
It wouldn't
surprise me if you had your own definition of the word surprise, because you obviously have definitions of other words that go against the norm. While you refer to UAA having "decent goaltending", most other fans would refer to their team's goaltending as "crappy" if their goalies had save percentages below .900. Or when you refer to UAA having "dynamic play up front", other people might view it as having "problems scoring goals" when their team is in the bottom 25% of Division I teams in scoring goals. Your definition of "playing solidly on the backend" is equally puzzling, because UAA is just as bad at keeping goals out of their own net as they are putting them in the other teams net (46th out of 59 teams). But until I am accepted into MENSA like you, and receive my copy of the Smart Persons' Dictionary, I will just continue defining the Seawolves as a bad hockey team.