Gutted the Clean Water Act, to the surprise of no one.
+6 and save the world.
9-0 in the judgment, 5-4 in scope (Kavanaugh joined the libs).
Less clean water = less ice-cold mountain beer for Kavanaugh?
9-0 in the judgment, 5-4 in scope (Kavanaugh joined the libs).
What does that mean, to split the judgment and scope like that? Anything significant?
I didn’t know this about gorsuch
https://twitter.com/beschlossdc/status/1661820050230194178?s=46&t=_zdCvWNS3v2cVkMjQylOVg
9-0 said the EPA overreached in this particular case. 5 said "The EPA overreaches whenever they try to regulate X," while 4 said, "The statute says the EPA can regulate X, this just isn't X."
5 said the EPA always overreaches? Good Lord by what precedence is that opinion supported by?
5 said the EPA always overreaches? Good Lord by what precedence is that opinion supported by?