What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS, Now with KBJ

Status
Not open for further replies.
SJHovey said:
I have no idea what this post even refers to.

I am not in favor of the government coming in and limiting free speech in any way. I was simply commenting that I think people who go into a restaurant and harass someone who is eating because of some political or other issue, are acting in an inappropriate way, I don't support them doing it
Click to expand...

Public harassment? Calling the police? Stop whining. They didn’t even commit a crime. They exercised their First Amendment rights, and you suggest it’s in poor taste, while suggesting that Kavanaugh should have prosecuted them?
 
psych said:
Public harassment? Calling the police? Stop whining. They didn’t even commit a crime. They exercised their First Amendment rights, and you suggest it’s in poor taste, while suggesting that Kavanaugh should have prosecuted them?
Click to expand...

I said no such thing, and the fact that you seem to think I did says a lot more about you than it does about me.
 
SJHovey said:
I don't think you have any sort of expectation of privacy when you go to a public location like a restaurant or a store, and I don't think the ruling in Dobbs, however it turned out, would have changed that.

That said, Kavanaugh's issue in the restaurant can be handled in other ways. First, the restaurant owner can simply ask the protesters to leave, when they don't, call the police and have them trespassed. That was probably the correct way to handle it. If they don't do that, then if I'm Kavanaugh, I simply find someplace else to eat where the proprietor has more control over his facility.

There is also probably some sort of harassment/restraining order process in Maryland that Kavanaugh can use to prevent individuals from harassing him under some threat of jail, but I don't see a SCOTUS justice doing that.

I agree with slapshot that I am generally opposed to the public harassment of people, any person. If I saw someone in a restaurant with whom I strongly disagreed politically, it would never dawn on me to go up to them and berate them publicly, but that's just how I was raised. I have a sneaky suspicion that most of the people on this board would be the same way, probably because that's the way they were raised too.
Click to expand...

Are you learning impaired?
 
psych said:
Are you learning impaired?
Click to expand...

Is there any point in that post where I talk about kavanaugh “prosecuting” anyone? He’s a fucking judge.

I said that if he chose he could bring a request for a harassment restraining order (which you apparently think is some sort of prosecution.) Further, where do I suggest he should? I stated that it was an option available.
 
SJHovey said:
Is there any point in that post where I talk about kavanaugh “prosecuting” anyone? He’s a fucking judge.

I said that if he chose he could bring a request for a harassment restraining order (which you apparently think is some sort of prosecution.) Further, where do I suggest he should? I stated that it was an option available.
Click to expand...

Except it isn’t an option available. You are suggesting that Kavanaugh take legal action against these people. You know, like one of the definitions of the word prosecute. You know your argument sucks when that’s the best you’ve got. Bless your heart, you’re not on your game today.
 
psych said:
Except it isn’t an option available. You are suggesting that Kavanaugh take legal action against these people. You know, like one of the definitions of the word prosecute. You know your argument sucks when that’s the best you’ve got. Bless your heart, you’re not on your game today.
Click to expand...

Except you didn’t post “prosecute a legal action.” You wrote “prosecute them.”

Keep digging.
 
Will someone else please come in and tell me I’m being trolled, therefore walk away? I can’t say I’ve ever seen grasping for straws on this level before.
 
Handyman said:
Funny these whiny snowflakes have no issue with the years of protesting (with actual physical contact) that women had to deal with outside Planned Parenthood. I guess only fuckwit (alleged) rapists get to have any sort of peace and quiet.
Click to expand...

Exactly. No one cared then cause it wasn't a white male's ox being gored. Once a white male is affected then the shit hits the fan.
 
The cruelty is the point. Women don’t deserve to have sex for anything but popping one out.

and Again, the states rights motherfuckers won’t have any comment on these things
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
The cruelty is the point. Women don’t deserve to have sex for anything but popping one out.

and Again, the states rights motherfuckers won’t have any comment on these things
Click to expand...

The woman fortunately through her plea on social media was able to find a doctor to perform the procedure. She shouldn't have to go through all that to accomplish such a simple thing.
 
I swear to God if Ricketts takes the DOJ case against the Wrigley Field renovations to SCOTUS and SCOTUS does away with the ADA act..... :mad: *mad face*:mad:
 
It's a start.

A legal-focused Democratic group for the first time on Friday issued pledges of support for party candidates who looking to win congressional elections in November, and each of the endorsed candidates support expanding the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Demand Justice political action committee announced the endorsements for seven candidates for federal office, including incumbent Reps. Andy Levin of Michigan and Mondaire Jones of New York.
Click to expand...

First rule of business is normalize in political conversation. The other side is not bound by any norms. We at least will proceed legally.
 
Nice.

In the days following former President Donald Trump's loss in 2020, at least two Wisconsin lawmakers received an email from longtime conservative activist and wife to a U.S. Supreme Court justice Ginni Thomas urging the legislators to change the outcome of Wisconsin's presidential election, according to a new report

Thomas, using an email program that allowed her to communicate with lawmakers on a mass scale, sent messages to Senate Elections Committee chairwoman Kathy Bernier and state Rep. Gary Tauchen, R-Bonduel, on Nov. 9, 2020, asking both to "take action to ensure that a clean slate of Electors is chosen for our state," according to The Washington Post and emails obtained by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel under the state's public records law.
Click to expand...
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
They all lied, shocking

https://twitter.com/sifill_/status/1571157277440196612?s=46&t=h2sys8Gk-LLc5tu_vDG1Lw
Click to expand...

By the time the American people wake up, I mean REALLY wake up, it will be too late. Our legal and judicial systems have almost no legitimacy left. The powerful can manipulate things forever (justice delayed is justice denied, it goes both ways) and our judicial system at so many levels has become completely politicized.

Even if we vote blue the resulting elections need to produce some actual change. We have never needed courageous people to step forward as much as we need it now.
 
Kepler said:
Everyone capable of waking up has. Nobody else is going to wake up.

The rest aren't asleep. They want this. They have always hated democracy and rule of law. They believe in their iron age superstitions and rule at gunpoint. They want to hurt anyone who is different.
Click to expand...

Yeah, and they think we are attacking them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top