What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Drew S. said:
I have it figured out much more clearly than you and others on his board. They don’t give people some sort of multiple choice exam. People have had others handle their finances for one of many reasons.
Click to expand...

This still isn't about people that voluntarily decide to have others handle their finances for them. Good job proving your first sentence wrong with your third.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Drew S. said:
I have it figured out much more clearly than you and others on his board.
Click to expand...

When grandma starts spending all her money on Publisher's Clearing House contests, or sending it to some TV preacher, maybe you'll think differently.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

rufus said:
When grandma starts spending all her money on Publisher's Clearing House contests, or sending it to some TV preacher, maybe you'll think differently.
Click to expand...

If grandma wants to do that, that's her money. Sure, you might see it as inheritance, but you don't get it until she croaks.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

FlagDUDE08 said:
If grandma wants to do that, that's her money. Sure, you might see it as inheritance, but you don't get it until she croaks.
Click to expand...

Of course you would think that. It's perfectly ok for grandma to get fleeced by con men.

Then again, you are a Trumper. You don't mind getting fleeced by con men.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

rufus said:
Of course you would think that. It's perfectly ok for grandma to get fleeced by con men.

Then again, you are a Trumper. You don't mind getting fleeced by con men.
Click to expand...

Not to mention a consumer of Alex Jones' dick pills and brain elixirs.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Don't know about the dick pills, but I'd ask for a refund on the brain elixirs.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Shouldn't you be delivering pizzas, mookie? Fight the power.
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

There's a lot of love in this thread. You can just feel it! :D
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

joecct said:
How did JK do in yesterday's oral arguments??
Click to expand...

Strutted in with a popped collar under his robes, wearing sunglasses indoors, and drinking from a red Solo cup. Gave Thomas a bro-hug and said, "No homo". Standard proceedings then began. ;)
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Drew S. said:
Lot of senile grandmothers committing mass shootings.
Click to expand...
Yeah because they used to have a law barring them from owning guns lmao. Thanks for proving my original point after arguing against it on the basis of "how rich they are", which has nothing to do with anything.
rufus said:
Of course you would think that. It's perfectly ok for grandma to get fleeced by con men.

Then again, you are a Alex Jones supporter. You don't mind getting fleeced by con men.
Click to expand...
Fixed
 
Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Wednesday referred more than a dozen judicial misconduct complaints filed recently against Brett M. Kavanaugh to a federal appeals court in Colorado.

The 15 complaints, related to statements Kavanaugh made during his Senate confirmation hearings, were initially filed with the federal appeals court in Washington, where Kavanaugh served for the last 12 years before his confirmation Saturday to the Supreme Court.

The allegations center on whether Kavanaugh was dishonest and lacked judicial temperament during his Senate testimony, according to people familiar with the matter.

Last month, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit asked Roberts to refer the complaints to another appeals court for review after determining that they should not be handled by judges who served with Kavanaugh on the D.C. appellate court.
Click to expand...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...5875bac0b1f_story.html?utm_term=.f93a6c32171f

I'd bet eleventy billion dollars that nothing comes of this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top