USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
- Status
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
<img src="https://media.tenor.com/images/fd388e21d1ee121a17ebc665ab9d1b23/tenor.gif" />
It is going to be cute in 2 years when she tries and convince people she was duped again! Any chance she had of calling herself a "moderate" died with her fellating of Kavanaugh there.
<img src="https://media.tenor.com/images/fd388e21d1ee121a17ebc665ab9d1b23/tenor.gif" />
It is going to be cute in 2 years when she tries and convince people she was duped again! Any chance she had of calling herself a "moderate" died with her fellating of Kavanaugh there.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Good god Maine sux
Good god Maine sux
She has Parkinson’s and I have a feeling she’s not going to run again. If she is I can’t wait to vote against her.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Why do you hate women?
trixR4kids
New member
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JOE MANCHIN SAYS HE'S A YES on Kavanaugh.</p>— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1048300330796998656?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Why does the DCCC support this clown? He can't even do the bare minimum of not aiding and abetting fascism.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">JOE MANCHIN SAYS HE'S A YES on Kavanaugh.</p>— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) <a href="https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1048300330796998656?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Why does the DCCC support this clown? He can't even do the bare minimum of not aiding and abetting fascism.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Go plant an “anyone but susan” sign on the lawn now
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Because a Democrat in West Virginia is better than a Republican in West Virginia.
I don't know why this is such a difficult concept. It's one of the reddest states in the nation. A Senator voting with you even 30% of the time is better than someone voting with you 0% of the time.
Simple math.
Because a Democrat in West Virginia is better than a Republican in West Virginia.
I don't know why this is such a difficult concept. It's one of the reddest states in the nation. A Senator voting with you even 30% of the time is better than someone voting with you 0% of the time.
Simple math.
trixR4kids
New member
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is the dumbest thing ever said by any elected representative ever. <a href="https://t.co/SeyjvZ9OaX">https://t.co/SeyjvZ9OaX</a></p>— Charles P. Pierce (@CharlesPPierce) <a href="https://twitter.com/CharlesPPierce/status/1048301322972418051?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is the dumbest thing ever said by any elected representative ever. <a href="https://t.co/SeyjvZ9OaX">https://t.co/SeyjvZ9OaX</a></p>— Charles P. Pierce (@CharlesPPierce) <a href="https://twitter.com/CharlesPPierce/status/1048301322972418051?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
trixR4kids
New member
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
(Yes technically he votes with Trump slightly less than the more centristy republicans I'm aware)
He does everything the Republicans would do anyhow, what exactly is the difference?
(Yes technically he votes with Trump slightly less than the more centristy republicans I'm aware)
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
This is demonstrably false and ignorant.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/?ex_cid=rrpromo
This is demonstrably false and ignorant.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/?ex_cid=rrpromo
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
He's a politician, so he flips to yes in a meaningless gesture a month from his reelection. But no, let's do purity tests. That's worked wonders for the Democrats over the last decade.
He's a politician, so he flips to yes in a meaningless gesture a month from his reelection. But no, let's do purity tests. That's worked wonders for the Democrats over the last decade.
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
I can understand trix' frustration with Manchin as Kavanaugh merely on temperament and whack-job conspiracy theories is unfit for the bench, be it the SCOTUS or the one he sits on now. Having said that I can grudgingly live with it or put another way its not at the top of my radar. With 50 votes assured he's not the deciding factor, and I saw it written last week by a GOP operative that if he votes Yes on Kavanaugh they're taking the race off the board and concentrating elsewhere because the GOP opponent is too far down in the polls. As I often say, the worst Democrat (say Manchin) is better than the best Republican (the formerly "moderate" Collins). One voted for tax theft. The other voted against it. Some people on the left are going to be tempted to prop up Murkowski now as the token "Republican We Admire" now that McCain has passed and Collins' true nature is finally revealed. However, I wouldn't trust her either while admiring her vote against Kavanaugh.
I can understand trix' frustration with Manchin as Kavanaugh merely on temperament and whack-job conspiracy theories is unfit for the bench, be it the SCOTUS or the one he sits on now. Having said that I can grudgingly live with it or put another way its not at the top of my radar. With 50 votes assured he's not the deciding factor, and I saw it written last week by a GOP operative that if he votes Yes on Kavanaugh they're taking the race off the board and concentrating elsewhere because the GOP opponent is too far down in the polls. As I often say, the worst Democrat (say Manchin) is better than the best Republican (the formerly "moderate" Collins). One voted for tax theft. The other voted against it. Some people on the left are going to be tempted to prop up Murkowski now as the token "Republican We Admire" now that McCain has passed and Collins' true nature is finally revealed. However, I wouldn't trust her either while admiring her vote against Kavanaugh.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
unofan
Well-known member
If his vote doesn't matter, I don't give a Fark. Let him get political cover at home.
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation
Of course the protesters were all paid.
Soros is a god****ed gazillionaire.
Of course the protesters were all paid.
Soros is a god****ed gazillionaire.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Those three worked this all out days ago.
- Status