Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
The general concept seems awesome. But I would imagine there are many unforeseen consequences that would make it workable but suboptimal. You'd think its better to just ride other renewables solar/wind hard.
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
First, that's really cool. I hope that tech makes its way into common use sooner rather than later.
Second, what are the downstream consequences? It seems like a good way for some third-world nation to start yet another deforestation project into order to capitalize on more agriculture land on these sugar-rich plants.
The general concept seems awesome. But I would imagine there are many unforeseen consequences that would make it workable but suboptimal. You'd think its better to just ride other renewables solar/wind hard.