busterman62
I got a pocket full of kryptonite
Re: Sandusky/Penn State scandal
Take it one step further Scooby.
Per the Grand Jury report, JoPa was contacted by McQueary and told what McQueary saw. JoPa passed the story on to AD Curley and to VP Schultz (who happens to oversee the campus police). Curley and Schultz then interviewed that someone else, McQueary, and told him they have taken care of it.
All this is about an incident that JoPA heard from someone else. Rest assured that when the Grand Jury's findings go to trial , JoPa will never even make it through the courtroom doors since anything he would say about the incident would be hearsay.
Did JoPa do enough legally? It seems so based on the Grand Jury's findings. Did JoPa do enough morally? Most here say NO. I'm not sure based on the limited info we have but I'd counter the mobthink by saying JoPa did inform his superior AND the VP who oversees the Campus Police. Hindsight, even according to JoPa, says he didn't do enough. However, I could see where JoPa could have thought he did enough at the time based on hearsay evidence and what is reportedly a effort by Curley & Schultz to suppress the severity of it. Unfortunately, we'll probably never get the full story.
Curley & Schultz who are being charged with perjury in there apparent attempt to cover this up are apparently being defended by PSU funds. McQueary, who was present when the incident supposedly occurred and didn't do right then is being ASKED not to coach Sat. JoPa is fired because he is the figurehead. Equitable? Not in my book.
That really puts Maize's point into perspective from earlier. I'm now wondering why JoPa was canned.
That really puts Maize's point into perspective from earlier. I'm now wondering why JoPa was canned.
Take it one step further Scooby.
Per the Grand Jury report, JoPa was contacted by McQueary and told what McQueary saw. JoPa passed the story on to AD Curley and to VP Schultz (who happens to oversee the campus police). Curley and Schultz then interviewed that someone else, McQueary, and told him they have taken care of it.
All this is about an incident that JoPA heard from someone else. Rest assured that when the Grand Jury's findings go to trial , JoPa will never even make it through the courtroom doors since anything he would say about the incident would be hearsay.
Did JoPa do enough legally? It seems so based on the Grand Jury's findings. Did JoPa do enough morally? Most here say NO. I'm not sure based on the limited info we have but I'd counter the mobthink by saying JoPa did inform his superior AND the VP who oversees the Campus Police. Hindsight, even according to JoPa, says he didn't do enough. However, I could see where JoPa could have thought he did enough at the time based on hearsay evidence and what is reportedly a effort by Curley & Schultz to suppress the severity of it. Unfortunately, we'll probably never get the full story.
Curley & Schultz who are being charged with perjury in there apparent attempt to cover this up are apparently being defended by PSU funds. McQueary, who was present when the incident supposedly occurred and didn't do right then is being ASKED not to coach Sat. JoPa is fired because he is the figurehead. Equitable? Not in my book.