I highly doubt we will see Lacka this weekend. He could not even hang on to his stick when skating to the bench.
Was surprised to see Jasper Ohrval playing for UAH. He did get a lot of ice time. Is he going to be an aeronautical engineer or unhappy at RPI?
Regrettably I have the same feeling as well. And even if he were fit to go, would we risk him before league play starts?
He was a management major, so I assume the latter, at least in terms of the coaching change. It did seem like we recruited him to bring his brother in, who looked very skilled, albeit rough around the edges. If he also goes to UAH, they will have a fine player at their disposal.
RPI Hockey 2018 - 2019 (Part II): Engineers in a Train Wreck
That's my mood today.
Was surprised to see Jasper Ohrval playing for UAH. He did get a lot of ice time. Is he going to be an aeronautical engineer or unhappy at RPI?
I said it earlier, he's training for the Space Force
I can't speak to the individual recruits, but the departure of the Ohrvalls was not much of a loss.
Do we know how long Lacka is out?
I really don't know what you guys expected. We have a team that hasn't played together and it shows. The lines have no chemistry and the defense is all over the place.
We are going to need time to gel. We improved Saturday night, and that bodes well for the future, as these guys can still get much better.
The problem will still be scoring, as we have not shown any improvement in that department.
It may very well be a long season, but I will give them a chance at least until January to come together as a team.
Scoring doesn't just happen. Players rely on chemistry. Nothing has changed from last year or the year before that for that matter with this team. The lines are still mismatched as far as talent and skill is concerned IMO. You can't change players game to game or period to period for that matter. Why are 37, 63 and 88 for the Boston Bruins one of the best lines if not he best line in the NHL the last two season? They have chemistry. They play together night in and night out. I haven't seen a player in the last 2 years under this coach been with the same 2 linemates for more than 3 or 4 games. That's not enough time to build chemistry. You can't have slow footed skaters with speedsters. It goes on and on.
I really don't know what you guys expected. We have a team that hasn't played together and it shows. The lines have no chemistry and the defense is all over the place.
We are going to need time to gel. We improved Saturday night, and that bodes well for the future, as these guys can still get much better.
The problem will still be scoring, as we have not shown any improvement in that department.
It may very well be a long season, but I will give them a chance at least until January to come together as a team.
Scoring doesn't just happen. Players rely on chemistry. Nothing has changed from last year or the year before that for that matter with this team. The lines are still mismatched as far as talent and skill is concerned IMO. You can't change players game to game or period to period for that matter. Why are 37, 63 and 88 for the Boston Bruins one of the best lines if not he best line in the NHL the last two season? They have chemistry. They play together night in and night out. I haven't seen a player in the last 2 years under this coach been with the same 2 linemates for more than 3 or 4 games. That's not enough time to build chemistry. You can't have slow footed skaters with speedsters. It goes on and on.
EHF I am a bit of disagreement here. The score may have been closer but we were not better in at all the second night. Friday I felt i saw some things we could work with. At least for the first two periods in which I felt we played well. Take away some of the power play time and we were at least fair 5 on 5. Saturday, I cannot find anything that made me feel we were competing well with UMass. Holding them to 2-1 late into the third period was miraculous. But we did not even show the urgency that you need late to tie that game up. We could not control the puck. Someone pointed out in a previous post that we could not string two passes together. We seemed to make all the wrong decisions and I cannot count how often two of our own players knocked into each other. UMass had so much skating room (especially just inside our blue line) that they could have set up a catered affair. I felt and others can disagree, that Friday was a tighter game at 6-1 and that Saturday was a blowout at 3-1. Just my opinion and i am probably as usual in the minority.
Doc, we stayed out of the box for the most part Saturday, and that is an improvement. As for the play, we don't get a six month preseason to get a team together. Half of the team consists of new players, and they play like they don't know each other.
I just want to give them a chance to get to know each other. We have an extra day of practice this week, and I expect an improvement over last week. But there is no guarantee that it will happen.
I just won't give up on these guys until they have had time together.
I totally agree with the fact that they don't show any urgency at any time during the game. They don't seem to have the energy to kick it up a notch. That could be a reflection of the coach. He seems very laid back to me and that may need to change. JMO