Re: RPI Hockey 2015 - 2016:: Six Flags Over the HFH
It is difficult to make a projection at this time concerning At-Large bids. But ever since the elimination of the TUC criterion, it is all about RPI index. The RPI now correlates to PWR at about 99%. So win and your RPI goes up, lose and it goes down (exceptions are eliminated from the calculation). At the end of the conference playoffs, teams having an RPI of about .5400 are on the bubble. Our current RPI of .5341 indicates that we must improve in the second half. Despite having the 19th toughest schedule to date and winning at a .600 clip, it isn't good enough. We need to do better. Generally that means going deep into the ECAC tournament but not necessarily having to win it.
With only three games left in non-conference play (against a KRACH-average Miami team and those jerks from Schenectady one last time) and a bare minimum of 16 games of ECAC cannibalization to come, I can't see us getting into the dance without winning the ECAC tournament. Without taking the Whitelaw, we stand a very good chance of being bumped by the AHC or WCHA champs.
It is difficult to make a projection at this time concerning At-Large bids. But ever since the elimination of the TUC criterion, it is all about RPI index. The RPI now correlates to PWR at about 99%. So win and your RPI goes up, lose and it goes down (exceptions are eliminated from the calculation). At the end of the conference playoffs, teams having an RPI of about .5400 are on the bubble. Our current RPI of .5341 indicates that we must improve in the second half. Despite having the 19th toughest schedule to date and winning at a .600 clip, it isn't good enough. We need to do better. Generally that means going deep into the ECAC tournament but not necessarily having to win it.