I try to stay optimistic about this team but it is getting increasingly difficult. We seem destined to be in the bottom 4 of the ECAC. I am so impressed with how Union has built their program over the last few years from ECAC doormat to a tough mid-level competitor. Brown...same thing. What is standing in the way of RPI doing a similar rebuilding?
Valid question. I would add this same question over on the boy's side. The boy's side has not scored a goal in an NCAA tournament game since March 1985!!
So what is the root of the problem here? If it is a case of the Tute not having the resources to support serious Div 1 athletics then we should just acknowledge that and strive to be strong D3 teams, as in our other sports. But if we have the resources to support D1 in these key historically important sports teams on campus and are just not following through, then what needs to be done to shake things up and at least strive to be better than Union, Dartmouth, Brown etc??? We have been accepting mediocrity for too long.
I try to stay optimistic about this team but it is getting increasingly difficult. We seem destined to be in the bottom 4 of the ECAC. I am so impressed with how Union has built their program over the last few years from ECAC doormat to a tough mid-level competitor. Brown...same thing. What is standing in the way of RPI doing a similar rebuilding?
This post of mine did not age well .
Our girls now are on break for a month but have a 4-4-1 in conference record and have already won 11 games overall. More important, they are fun and exciting to watch and the empty field house is a disservice to a team that deserves much more support.
The female Engineers are always fast and exciting and I agree, it pains me to see so many empty seats. Their schedule in the new year is quite strange. Four home games, and then a stretch of 10 games where they only see the HFH twice.
Not sure if this break will allow for some of the injured to return. Specifically #13 looked like she was seriously injured and could not put any weight on her leg. Her loss is going to be felt as the season moves on with the other girls having to see much more ice time. Not totally sure that others are not playing with some nagging injuries but we are seeing contributions across the board from 4 lines and 3 sets of defense.
#13 is Taylor Larsen, one of my favourite players. Very solid on defense and moves the puck up the ice well. Hopefully she will get back on the ice.
Attended both games this weekend. Have been to as many as I can. Their wins this weekend were impressive. Very much a team effort. Starting with Keating in goal on out. Yes they have a few outstanding players, but every person on this team gives their all and support each other. Just watch them on the bench. Clearly they love playing with each other. And the women not dressed also are enthusiastic toward the team. I saw Larsen limping. I was at the game she was injured in and I hope she is able to get back on the ice especially with the time off ahead. She is fun to watch.
I went home and watched the men play as I do when they are on the road. It was not an impressive performance. The difference is the women have a goalie(s) that can keep them in the game to let the rest of the team capitalize on their chances. The men are not showing that at all. I don’t care where either team ends up standings wise, the women are more fun to watch. As a men’s season ticket holder, I have to ask how many of the other season ticket holders attend the women’s games. Especially when the tickets are free.
One other thing about this weekend. Very few penalties and Trnkova had none of them. She seemed, for lack of a better way to put it, tentative. Not that she played poorly, but I think she is focusing on not going over the line and she looked a bit uncomfortable with that.
Attended both games this weekend. Tough weekend. Even though RPI lost vs Qpac 4-0, I thought Keating bounced back from a pretty lousy half game against Princeton.
But what was glaringly apparent is Andrea Trnkova. There is little question she was not 100%. She appeared injured or ill. And she looked defeated on the bench with head down and seemed out of breath. I imagine the decision was made that there is no one to put in for her (with Taylor Larsen still out. For how long is ???) so her less than 100% is better than not having enough D.
Finally not sure how effective having the season ticket appreciation event at the women’s game was. It didn’t appear overall attendance was better as a result. I don’t know how many season ticket holders there are, but later in tgthey gave away the pizza to everyone. BTW. The ‘gift’ was a winter hat with the 200 RPI logo on it.
Definitely seemed #89 was feeling the after shock of taking that hit to the head at the end of the first period. She took quite a bit of time to rise from the ice and needed assistance getting to the bench and then the locker room.Pretty sure if we had anyone who could replace her it would have been done. You saw it as I did Saturday - she was not 100%. With Larsen out (and Erbinova for Saturday's game) we are defensively challenged. perhaps what was the strength of this team has now become a worry. Obviously we were offensively challenged before this weekend and if we now add defen sive injuries, next weekend may be a big uphill battle for us.