What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

FlagDUDE08 said:
uhhhh.... Kick Save and a Beauty was the first one to mention the happy sack.

In any case, my suggestions:
RPI 2010-2011 V: Betting on 23 Red (or 25 Red, depending upon the bye situation)
RPI 2010-2011 V: The Albany Curse is Gone. Let's aim for the Championships!
Click to expand...

Come to think about it, it would have to be 25 Red. We're at 19-9-4 now, 2 games left for regular season, and if we're lucky enough to get a bye, four more games for the league championship. Although 27 (should we not get the bye) is also red; perhaps we use that instead for a double meaning.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

AspyDad said:
Nobody should throw anything on the ice. The refs are absolutely atrocious but that is no excuse.
Click to expand...

While I agree with the spirit of your statement, I have to nitpick - Hats are an acceptable item to throw on the ice, but the proper situation must arise first ;)
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

FlagDUDE08 said:
Come to think about it, it would have to be 25 Red. We're at 19-9-4 now, 2 games left for regular season, and if we're lucky enough to get a bye, four more games for the league championship. Although 27 (should we not get the bye) is also red; perhaps we use that instead for a double meaning.
Click to expand...

I think you're trying too hard.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

FlagDUDE08 said:
uhhhh.... Kick Save and a Beauty was the first one to mention the happy sack.

In any case, my suggestions:
RPI 2010-2011 V: Betting on 23 Red (or 25 Red, depending upon the bye situation)
RPI 2010-2011 V: The Albany Curse is Gone. Let's aim for the Championships!
Click to expand...

I like the second one. I don't get the other one.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

LTsatch said:
The funny thing about Yale posters is that we all get lumped in as Yale alumni or students. In my case I am town not gown. I appreciate the kind words and as I always enjoy the RPI threads. Good luck next weekend.
Click to expand...

A lot of the RPI posters aren't alumni or students either. (I am an alum.) Besides for locals, there are also relatives of players (current, future, and past).
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

How about RPI 2010-2011 V: The Playoffs begin NOW ? After all, this weekend games are playoff caliber and should be played that way...
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

fr joe said:
How about RPI 2010-2011 V: The Playoffs begin NOW ? After all, this weekend games are playoff caliber and should be played that way...
Click to expand...

The title would only be valid for a short time.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

Red Cloud said:
Before we get to why they're lame, what's not to get about the first one?
Click to expand...

I didn't see the post where he explained "23". I still don't like it because betting on red could pertain to other schools.

The Albany Curse one is fine with me. So why is it lame?
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

RPI 2010-2011 V: No Sac, No Glory????

RPI 2010-2011 V: "They" are out to get us.

RPI 2010-2011 V: I still believe in Seth Appert.

RPI 2010-2011 V: Engineering a great finish.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

RPI 2010-2011 V: Get used to hearing about us

RPI 2010-2011 V: On the fast train to glory

RPI 2010-2011 V: If they want it bad enough, they will get it!
 
Last edited:
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

We should start a thread just for coming up with thread titles.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

DrDemento said:
We should start a thread just for coming up with thread titles.
Click to expand...

That crossed my mind a while back, but it would probably just cause fans of other teams and leagues to make asinine suggestions. They can do that here, of course, but I suspect few of them bother to read this.
 
Last edited:
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

fishcore12 said:
RPI 2010-2011 V: No Sac, No Glory????

RPI 2010-2011 V: "They" are out to get us.

RPI 2010-2011 V: I still believe in Seth Appert.

RPI 2010-2011 V: Engineering a great finish.
Click to expand...

I'll ignore #1. :D

#2 isn't bad. #3 is one that we can use. Personally, I wouldn't use #4 because it would be woofing.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

Allow me to end this debate.

RPI V: We need to come up with a title.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

Allow an outsider to chime in

RPI 2010-2011 V- "Just because we are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get us"
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

LTsatch said:
Allow an outsider to chime in

RPI 2010-2011 V- "Just because we are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get us"
Click to expand...

I'm going to shoot that one down because I'm sick and tired of Cornell clowns levying that charge in the first place. Of course, they deny to the death that their team is easily the most boring in the league to watch, so their credibility is nil, but I'm still sick of them.
 
Re: RPI 2010-2011 IV: We Still Have Allen York. Sorry, Everyone!

Ralph Baer said:
I didn't see the post where he explained "23". I still don't like it because betting on red could pertain to other schools.

The Albany Curse one is fine with me. So why is it lame?
Click to expand...

I was trying to come up with the number of wins we needed to get to Atlantic City, but then I thought maybe 25 wins were needed, and then for some reason, it was about winning the ECAC championship. On a roulette wheel, those numbers happen to be red. If Yale beats Cornell then Cornell requires an even number, which, around that area, is black.

Yes, my suggestions were lame, but hey, it's a start, and it's better than using genital organs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top