What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

After watching the post game and reading Ed Weavers column there seemed to be an insinuation that U got the shaft in penalties....just not the case.....If you factor in the 15 min handed out to Ingolsby for
hitting from behind (well deserved) the totals then become RPI...8/16 Union...7/14 pretty even when I went to school.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

troyboy said:
After watching the post game and reading Ed Weavers column there seemed to be an insinuation that U got the shaft in penalties....just not the case.....If you factor in the 15 min handed out to Ingolsby for
hitting from behind (well deserved) the totals then become RPI...8/16 Union...7/14 pretty even when I went to school.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure the totals were 3/6 and 7/14. That's not pretty even. And you add in the 2/15 for UC and it's even worse. Now, I don't see any reason that the penalty total should have been any different. But, it was uneven. That's not debatable.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

AspyDad said:
Please refrain from the name calling. Aren't you the person who just posted about the crowd being rude?
Click to expand...

How about we all stop trying to make this thread about us and make it about RPI hockey...Im done going back and forth with other posters on non-hockey related issues.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

A quick question for those more informed on the rules of hockey than I: If we were playing by the NHL's overtime rules (4v4) last night, then what would have happened when the cross-checking penalty was committed? Julseth-White would have sat, and the 2 minutes would have started after the major penalty was served? Therefore, RPI would have had the man advantage for the rest of the game, unless they also committed a penalty, correct? I'm just curious as to what the specifics are and if my reasoning is correct.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

burgie12 said:
A quick question for those more informed on the rules of hockey than I: If we were playing by the NHL's overtime rules (4v4) last night, then what would have happened when the cross-checking penalty was committed? Julseth-White would have sat, and the 2 minutes would have started after the major penalty was served? Therefore, RPI would have had the man advantage for the rest of the game, unless they also committed a penalty, correct? I'm just curious as to what the specifics are and if my reasoning is correct.
Click to expand...

I believe you are correct about sitting until the major penalty ended. I dont think if a penalty was called on RPI that they would start the second penalty and play 3v2. I know the NHL tested some of these changes this summer and Koudys was involved in the 2 or 3 day test. One change was playing 4v4 then 3v3 then 2v2 in OT.
 
burgie12 said:
A quick question for those more informed on the rules of hockey than I: If we were playing by the NHL's overtime rules (4v4) last night, then what would have happened when the cross-checking penalty was committed? Julseth-White would have sat, and the 2 minutes would have started after the major penalty was served? Therefore, RPI would have had the man advantage for the rest of the game, unless they also committed a penalty, correct? I'm just curious as to what the specifics are and if my reasoning is correct.
Click to expand...

I believe RPI would have gotten a 5th skater for the duration of the penalty. When over, J-W would have come out of the box and next whistle the teams would reset to 4v3.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

GRussinko said:
I believe RPI would have gotten a 5th skater for the duration of the penalty. When over, J-W would have come out of the box and next whistle the teams would reset to 4v3.
Click to expand...
This seems to go along with the general feeling I got reading this section of the NHL rulebook. But, they didn't actually have that example. That's why I was curious. And, I think that the penalty assessed to Ingoldsby / served by Carr, was due to expire before J-W's, for what it's worth.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

GRussinko said:
I believe RPI would have gotten a 5th skater for the duration of the penalty. When over, J-W would have come out of the box and next whistle the teams would reset to 4v3.
Click to expand...

Isn't their either a junior league, or maybe a club league, that does 3v3 for overtime and exactly this in the case of penalties?
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

burgie12 said:
I'm pretty sure the totals were 3/6 and 7/14. That's not pretty even. And you add in the 2/15 for UC and it's even worse. Now, I don't see any reason that the penalty total should have been any different. But, it was uneven. That's not debatable.
Click to expand...
I stand corrected the totals I posted were from Fri.Nite...Thanks for correcting me...see a little Red Cloud lives in us all.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

fishcore12 said:
How about we all stop trying to make this thread about us and make it about RPI hockey...Im done going back and forth with other posters on non-hockey related issues.
Click to expand...
I belive We collectivly are the thread.....Therefore it is all about us. JMO
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

troyboy said:
I belive We collectivly are the thread.....Therefore it is all about us. JMO
Click to expand...

You win not even gonna bother. I started posting here to talk about a hockey team not the self-promotion of the posters and love fest for a select few posters. I dont know how much more posting I will do anymore on the in-season thread. Will most likely stick to the recruits and game threads where hockey is still talked about.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

Maybe the game ends differently if the refs call RPI for the trip on Welsh that occurs with 2:34 remaining in the game. (30:10 on the video)
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

Whoa, what just happened to RPITV's website? I wanted to take a second look at some of the games and I only see two Brown games. On top of this, it's automatically going to beta.rpitv.org ....
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

FlagDUDE08 said:
Whoa, what just happened to RPITV's website? I wanted to take a second look at some of the games and I only see two Brown games. On top of this, it's automatically going to beta.rpitv.org ....
Click to expand...

Thanks for the report; we're working on it. Email rpitv@union.rpi.edu next time rather than clogging the thread =)

EDIT: Looks like we're back.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

AspyDad said:
First Red Cloud now Fishcore12 leaving. I was having some fun with the petition thing and you guys take it soooooooo serious. I'll take the break, you stay fishcore12. You can complain about the passionate fans yelling stuff at the refs or whatever. I want to be with those people who care enough to voice their opinions. Listen to Nick Bailen about the atmosphere and crowd last night. If it was up to some of you on this board you would nitpick the sh** out of them over their grammar when they yell. Let me get real for a second. The reason that I frequent the board is that I have a special needs child and I like to get on the board and have a laugh or find about a recruit to take a break but guys like you take yourself and this endeavor so serious that you have sucked the fun out of it. It's a board about hockey not a literary work. Lighten up. Stop the thought police stuff.
Click to expand...

Please stay. Im done with this stuff anyways. This place is a good place for people to express their passion and feelings on RPI hockey and the program. It has been fun while I posted. Never thought anything put on the internet would get people so worked up. I have never been serious about what I put on here but thats your opinion and your entitled to it by all means. I will continue going to the games and cheering on a program I grew up watching and never turned my back on when times got tough or people made fun of me for following college hockey. Thanks to everyone on here for putting up with my crap and stupid attempts at humor or whatever. Let me finish by saying Lets Go Red
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

AspyDad said:
I lied. This is my last post for awhile. It figures you're a Devils fan, they invented the trap.
Click to expand...

Aspy-the trap goes back a long time-I remember it being used by the Czechs against the Russians in the early 70's and even the Swedish teams using it. Montreal under Scotty Bowman was very successful with it. The Devils did not invent it by any means-they just refined it.
 
Re: RPI 2010-11 Part II: RPI, the Other Team, the Refs -- We're outnumbered 10 to 6.

AspyDad said:
It too bad that people like you ridicule others for reaching out. Oh well, I'll take you as a no.
Click to expand...
I wasn't ridiculing you AD. The 1st line was a cheap joke from Seinfeld. The 2nd was my attempt to respond to you in the way RC probably would have if someone on this thread made the same comments about just about any other poster here. So in a way, I'm just showing you part of what you were missing. So please... relax.

I would comment more frequently myself except being in the Boston area I see more of other D1 teams than RPI (sadly) and I prefer not to comment unless someone says something that interests me or I actually hear something that I believe is worth sharing. When I don't then I tend to just peruse what everyone here has to say - and I skim the game summaries because, and this is also sad I know, but I find scrolling through the comments and waiting for one of Ralph's celebrations to appear to be more stimulating than actually listening to the radio broadcast. I also find Dr' D's reliably pessimistic comments that he throws out whenever things go south somehow grounding in nature. Anyhow.. enough non-hockey...

Someone a while back stated that JFK may be our worst D-Man these days and at the time I almost replied to say that I could not agree more. I know he brings great leadership, but it would not surprise me if we actually do better over the next couple of weeks while he mends - so long as he stays in the locker room and keeps the underclassmen geared up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top