Re: RPI 2009-10 Part IV: The Boys are Back in Town
I suspect that they had the kids that do the Harvard radio broadcast make the selection because they picked the same 3 during the postgame.
Regarding the first goal:
I also listened to the Harvard broadcast on the way to the rink. I finally found it (haven't lived there for years so I couldn't remember the frequency) during the period when the refs were consulting with each other and the goal judge over the first goal. The announcers never came right out and said it didn't go in, but they said Harvard was lucky and that the goal judge never turned the light on. They clearly didn't see it go in and the broadcast positions at Bright are right over that net.
first win at the Big H since 2004 (?) IIRC the media guide correctly. Question for those who saw this game in person: what did you see in the 3rd period? Box score said RPI had two shots on goal the entire period...I'm wondering if that "killer instinct" thing (or lack thereof) is still an issue or whether the team has shown improvement in that area.
Also, see that collegehockeystats.net had Polacek, Pirri, and Conor Morrison from Harvard as the three stars of the game. Yet D'Amigo led all scorers with three points (1-2-3). Conor Morrison over D'Amigo? Hmmm.....
I suspect that they had the kids that do the Harvard radio broadcast make the selection because they picked the same 3 during the postgame.
Regarding the first goal:
I also listened to the Harvard broadcast on the way to the rink. I finally found it (haven't lived there for years so I couldn't remember the frequency) during the period when the refs were consulting with each other and the goal judge over the first goal. The announcers never came right out and said it didn't go in, but they said Harvard was lucky and that the goal judge never turned the light on. They clearly didn't see it go in and the broadcast positions at Bright are right over that net.