What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Robert Morris dropping hockey

Obviously, bad news. RMU was as competetive as any in CHA. Really on the way up.

As for conferences, why not merge CHA and NEWHA. Instead of two barely there conferences, one that could turn out a competitive team or two come tournament time. And it alleviates any time pressure for expanding the tournament.
 
I just wish the smart people in the room would say “we just don’t care about hockey” rather than gobbledygook.

True, the larger press release is just coded language for budget cuts and revenue actions across the university. I am guessing that hockey was the loser because it was likely the biggest line item that could be cut, given the current menu of RMU sports teams (few schools dare to cut football or hoops). The language about the hockey facility suggests other cost issues may have compounded the losses; one wonders if that complex will eventually be sold.
 
Big picture, this event makes me grateful for LIU and Stonehill adding hockey in recent/near future years. Women’s hockey has always been steps forward, steps backward and hopefully trending forward.

But that doesn’t change the sadness I feel on a lot of fronts, for the people involved, the livelihoods, the CHA, women’s hockey in Pittsburgh. What the does LIU hockey mean to someone in Pittsburgh? Not a whole lot.

Paul Colontino is a guy who has spent 21ish years building 3 different women's hockey programs. He is an excellent women’s head hockey coach. Was at Hurst for year 2 and 3 of that program, helped start up North Dakota, back to Hurst for the absolute peak (so far :) ) of that program, and then off to RMU in 2011. First year at RMU and his crew stunned Hurst in the
CHA Championship, winning their first ever title in a game they had no business winning. In his decade at RMU, he got that program ranked as high as number 5 I believe. He
managed to find and coach up talent, and they played with pride and confidence every time I watched them. That program, under Colontino, was a complete thorn in the side of both Hurst and Cuse, and made the league better for it.
I don’t know what is next for him, but should he still desire to be coaching women’s college hockey I hope he finds his next opportunity as soon as he’s ready. He was a GA my first year at Mercyhurst, by my recollection any program would be lucky to have him.

I went to a game at RMU’s rink a few years back. The band was there, the mascot, there was a promo happening, not a big crowd but enough, and it was a great game. It felt like a program that was valued by its school and as a CHA fan, I loved that because that is what every D1 hockey player deserves. You saw the pride in the program in the post game write ups, the fact that they often posted video of both teams highlights on their website (very gracious), their hype videos, the small but passionate Twitter media types fandom they had, the talent they kept recruiting, national program players here and there, the personality in their Twitter person...how I dreaded reading “jam it like a jay bird Jaycee Gebhard” followed by yet another goal announcement! And you see the pride they had in their program based on sad reactions of players today.

And anyone paying attention to the program (obvs not the board of trustees) would know about the McLaughlin Bittle family, both alums of the men’s and women’s programs, Brianne - from little RMU- an Olympian...and both of them 2 of the biggest ambassadors of that school in local girls hockey and beyond. Both still coaching girls/women , one locally and one seemingly headed back to the Olympics. Both legacies of the RMU programs, continuing to shape hockey in that city. How did the school not see the value in what they had? Who dropped the puck when USA Canada played at the Penguins practice facility, stands packed with little girl hockey players and old lady hockey players? McLaughlin. Why would RMU just opt out of the hockey scene in Pittsburgh?


When I look for value in that program, I see the opportunity someone like a Michaela Boyle had there. I knew it was trouble for the rest of the CHA as soon as I learned of the transfer and sure enough it was. It was gratifying to read about how positive the change had been for her. I feel badly for her and her teammates who now have to split up. I feel for them and past alums who won’t know the joy of getting to go back to their alma mater and witness a new team of Colonials, new group of young women being invested in, being given an opportunity to be D1 athletes, women’s hockey players at RMU.

To end I’ll say this. I love the CHA. It will be fine. Whether it’s mergers, realignments, a sixth team, or life as a 5 team league, they’ll be fine. But they’d be better with RMU.
 
Last edited:
As for conferences, why not merge CHA and NEWHA. Instead of two barely there conferences, one that could turn out a competitive team or two come tournament time.
Historically, this isn't fair to the CHA. The CHA has won games in the NCAAs (okay, Mercyhurst has); the NEWHA is still a dream that someone had. Moving forward, do you really want to saddle the Lakers, Syracuse, and Penn State with a schedule filled up with the likes of Post and St. Michael's? I don't see how that is going to produce a more competitive CHA champ.
 
Historically, this isn't fair to the CHA. The CHA has won games in the NCAAs (okay, Mercyhurst has); the NEWHA is still a dream that someone had. Moving forward, do you really want to saddle the Lakers, Syracuse, and Penn State with a schedule filled up with the likes of Post and St. Michael's? I don't see how that is going to produce a more competitive CHA champ.

They're the ones about to lose their autobid, aren't they? The win for NEWHA is they get a measure of legitimacy for recruiting, the win for CHA is they maintain a bid into the tournament.

otherwise, if I'm Syracuse, I'm thinking ECAC, and if I'm Penn State may be throwing some weight to a Big Ten happening, etc etc.(maybe with Mercyhurst as an "adjunct" member. They already do that with Notre Dame for men's hockey, and Johns Hopkins for Lacrosse.)

None of it what anyone might have chosen, but this is where they are now.
 
....... if I'm Syracuse, I'm thinking ECAC, ..........

ECAC runs their schedule with each team having a travel partner for each weekend. Syracuse/RIT make an excellent pair from a travel perspective, Syracuse/Mercyhurst or Syracuse/Penn State from a hockey perspective. 14 team League is doable from a schedule standpoint, 13 team would not be great.

Or lets really blow up the womens scene, IVY's Split from the ECAC and have their 6 team league (this screws Cornell from a travel perspective), Syracuse, Penn State, RIT and
Mercyhurst join the non-IVY teams in a 10 team league, CCT/SLU, RPI/Union, Syracuse/Colgate, Mercyhurst/RIT and Quinny/Penn State the travel partners. Lindenwood to the WCHA???

Or the ECAC could absorb 4 teams from the CHA and split into 2 conferences, 6 team IVY (Cornell/Prinny become travel partners) and 10 team Non-Ivy and run some type of cross schedule between the 2 conferences. Post season gets a bit tricky but each conference could have their own tournament and the 2 winners meet for the NC$$ Auto bid.
 
Last edited:
http://burghhockey.com/gajtka-rmus-misguided-athletic-priorities-let-hockey-teams/

It seems they want to be a basketball school and that’s their right for sure. It’s also being suggested that the issue is a need for capital investment in the ice rink as one reason for cutting hockey.

They put a lot of money into basketball’s facility ($50 million, all fundraised) rather than perhaps something more modest that left funds to address hockey’s capital needs too. It’s an interesting debate to me. Do you attempt to go big in one sport, or have modest but respectable facilities and try to gain your edge another way, in multiple sports? Obviously there are schools that can do it all, spend big everywhere; RMU is saying they aren’t one of them.

Another poster mentioned RMU’s endowment. It’s similar to Hurst’s but I have a hard time imagining Hurst building a $50 million dollar sports facility. This part of the statement about wanting to “align with schools our size” is a bit of gut punch as a result, but maybe Hurst is the outlier.

in the facilities arms race, in this scenario hockey became a casualty. Hard not to yearn for a day when common sense prevailed and modest yet still adequate facilities were considered palatable to the powers that be, at small institutions. If it was an “age and state of the ice rink” issue, could they have some sort of partnership with the rink at Cranberry, like what Lindenwood does? It’s a humble solution, but nothing wrong with it. If a $50 million dollar facility is going to be a standard for what a D1 facility should be, to the detriment of other capital projects, how is this sport going to grow? Just a shame altogether.
 
http://burghhockey.com/gajtka-rmus-misguided-athletic-priorities-let-hockey-teams/

It seems they want to be a basketball school and that’s their right for sure. It’s also being suggested that the issue is a need for capital investment in the ice rink as one reason for cutting hockey.

They put a lot of money into basketball’s facility ($50 million, all fundraised) rather than perhaps something more modest that left funds to address hockey’s capital needs too. It’s an interesting debate to me. Do you attempt to go big in one sport, or have modest but respectable facilities and try to gain your edge another way, in multiple sports? Obviously there are schools that can do it all, spend big everywhere; RMU is saying they aren’t one of them.

Another poster mentioned RMU’s endowment. It’s similar to Hurst’s but I have a hard time imagining Hurst building a $50 million dollar sports facility. This part of the statement about wanting to “align with schools our size” is a bit of gut punch as a result, but maybe Hurst is the outlier.

in the facilities arms race, in this scenario hockey became a casualty. Hard not to yearn for a day when common sense prevailed and modest yet still adequate facilities were considered palatable to the powers that be, at small institutions. If it was an “age and state of the ice rink” issue, could they have some sort of partnership with the rink at Cranberry, like what Lindenwood does? It’s a humble solution, but nothing wrong with it. If a $50 million dollar facility is going to be a standard for what a D1 facility should be, to the detriment of other capital projects, how is this sport going to grow? Just a shame altogether.

Isn't Robert Morris hand-in-hand with the Pittsburgh Penguins on some level? I thought I read that somewhere. If so, is there something legal keeping the Penguins from helping out the only D-1 hockey in Pittsburgh, or is it too late for that?
 
I think that many schools are going to be making difficult decisions regarding their athletic departments in the next few years. If a particular sport doesn't have any "friends in the room", like the AD or university president, then it is more likely that it gets axed. Many of these folks are political creatures, and they don't want to offend by losing a great basketball coach because they didn't come up with a multi-million dollar extension or have football slump because it didn't get a new practice facility. Beyond some parents and a couple dozen fans, who will be offended if hockey goes away at some of these schools?

This might answer some of our debates about possible conference realignment. Are any of these other leagues really so healthy that they won't have any casualties of their own?
 
Sorry for the worlds longest post. Feeling sad for RMU women’s hockey and wondering how their board didn’t see the value in fighting to keep them. :(

It understandable to be thoroughly dismayed and angry, but I am guessing the board might have needed to make a cut. I found some reporting about the financial condition of the university the year before the pandemic that suggests a landscape where any budget decision needed to be immediate.

Of course, hockey might have been saved by cutting the football budget, but this is Western PA and the rink "maintenance and investment" comments (and its riverfront acreage) suggest that hockey was going to be in a precarious position. Regardless of the reason, this is an unfair result for the players and staff.
 
It understandable to be thoroughly dismayed and angry, but I am guessing the board might have needed to make a cut. I found some reporting about the financial condition of the university the year before the pandemic that suggests a landscape where any budget decision needed to be immediate.
.

Who knows. I’m just bummed hockey in this area took a setback. :-(

And you see how messed up our priorities are as a society... there’s a quote in that link about freezing salaries of 10 year employees, and cutting 403b matching contributions. And these folks work in an environment that has a $50 mill basketball facility and events center.
 
Isn't Robert Morris hand-in-hand with the Pittsburgh Penguins on some level? I thought I read that somewhere. If so, is there something legal keeping the Penguins from helping out the only D-1 hockey in Pittsburgh, or is it too late for that?

Not sure Zed. Whole thing seems weird though right?

As an aside - Pittsburgh was the number one local tv market in the NHL this season.
 
Are any of these other leagues really so healthy that they won't have any casualties of their own?

Leagues, schools and programs. Whole thing is unsettling. I just did not see RMU as being the program to get cut.
AP has a story out picked up by many news services saying the women made the NCAA tourney in 2017. Forgot 2021, sigh.
 
Last edited:
AP has a story out picked up by many news services saying the women made the NCAA tourney in 2017. Forgot 2021, sigh.
My guess would be that the program updates its canned media release at the start of each season, and it likely listed conference titles and advancing to the tourney in 2017. It probably wasn't updated again after this year's tourney, so for those who look to a single source, there would be no mention of a 2021 tournament appearance.

At least what they reported was factual, just not comprehensive; a lot of what gets passed off as news these days isn't either.
 
Oh that FAKE NEWS :-) .

ARM - your explanation makes sense, did not realize that’s how it works.

Vicb- fake news in women’s hockey? Never! Next you’ll be denying the Clarkson college Fighting Nurses of Omaha Nebraska won a national championship in ice hockey. By the way, did you hear the NHL is going to fund a pro women’s league?
 
https://dkpittsburghsports.com/2021...d-steelers-kevin-colbert-resigned-board-jp-dk

It’s being reported that the board wasn’t even consulted before RMU cut their hockey programs. Decision made by board chair and by President of the university. GM of Steelers is (was) on the board and resigned this weekend.

I started looking at rosters this weekend for possible transfers, but stopped after the first 2 teams I looked at had over 25 players already. RMU community is trying to save their hockey teams, understandably, which further complicates things for players. What a mess.
 
Back
Top