What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

>>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

Good news. RIT didn't get shutout today! ;)

I think the only opponent they might have a chance of posting any wins against the rest of the season is possibly Lindenwood given how RIT is currently playing. I honestly don't see them being able to beat anybody else on their schedule.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

shelfit said:
Good news. RIT didn't get shutout today! ;)

I think the only opponent they might have a chance of posting any wins against the rest of the season is possibly Lindenwood given how RIT is currently playing. I honestly don't see them being able to beat anybody else on their schedule.
Click to expand...

Still wondering why you enjoy sniping at RIT so much. Don't you have some team you're a fan of you can support?


Powers &8^]
 
LtPowers said:
Still wondering why you enjoy sniping at RIT so much. Don't you have some team you're a fan of you can support?


Powers &8^]
Click to expand...

Very snipable target for ONE reason. Can you guess the ONE reason? Anyone? Bueller?
 
Last edited:
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

shelfit said:
Very snipable target for ONE reason. Can you guess the ONE reason? Anyone? Bueller?
Click to expand...

And then you avoid ever giving straight answers to simple questions. Let me know when you're willing to have a discussion instead of just spewing forth opinion.


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

LtPowers said:
And then you avoid ever giving straight answers to simple questions. Let me know when you're willing to have a discussion instead of just spewing forth opinion.


Powers &8^]
Click to expand...

Ok, like I'm the only one on this forum that types their own opinion on various topics. Don't be so silly. If you don't like my opinion that's fine with me. I know what I'm talking about and I'm not alone....there are many others that know the situation there as well.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

EastFan1 said:
So many people are saying?
Click to expand...

The number of people that put their opinion here in black and white doesn't include or reflect those that talk about it in the rinks. The problem begins and ends with the head of the program. Period.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

And you continue to talk in generalities. What is it you're looking for from us by coming in here and insulting a program in front of its fans? Are you looking for a fight? Do you just like seeing yourself type? I don't understand what you want from us. If you want us to agree with you you have to give us more to go on besides vague accusations of a "problem" with "the head of the program".

We don't even know who you are. A former player? A parent? A rival fan? What's the context in which you're hearing these things that the rest of us aren't?


Powers &8^]
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

I'm attending an RIT women's game for the 2nd time since the jump from DIII. After 1 period against Syracuse, RIT has only 1 shot on goal (although admittedly it did go in). This is definitely not the dominant RIT team I remember from their final DIII years, is it?
 
CARDS_rule_the_Burgh said:
I'm attending an RIT women's game for the 2nd time since the jump from DIII. After 1 period against Syracuse, RIT has only 1 shot on goal (although admittedly it did go in). This is definitely not the dominant RIT team I remember from their final DIII years, is it?
Click to expand...

No, because they can't recruit "up" like they did when they were D3. They're probably more D3 now than they were back then.
 
CARDS_rule_the_Burgh said:
I'm attending an RIT women's game for the 2nd time since the jump from DIII. After 1 period against Syracuse, RIT has only 1 shot on goal (although admittedly it did go in). This is definitely not the dominant RIT team I remember from their final DIII years, is it?
Click to expand...

Nope we don't have forwards that could sufficiently move the puck to get some offense going like we did in those days.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

shelfit said:
When this thread popped to the top the other day I got excited that maybe Scott had been fired. Lol.
Click to expand...

"Excited" someone gets fired? Why so negative? Did the coach do something to you?
 
hocper said:
"Excited" someone gets fired? Why so negative? Did the coach do something to you?
Click to expand...

Running the program into the ground is more than enough to hope the school/athletic director will "take the next step."
 
Last edited:
ritBLKnORGsuit said:
Ran the program into the ground? What are you basing it off of the team's record over the last two seasons?
Click to expand...

Running, not ran, running. Meaning he is currently running it into the ground. Weakest conference in the country and his team is going downhill fast.
 
Re: >>> RIT Tigers 2016-17: Let's Take the Next Step

shelfit said:
his team is going downhill fast.
Click to expand...

Everyone in the CHA gets athletic scholarships except RIT. RIT still has 2 CHA conference tourney titles, an NCAA appearance and they beat Penn State in play-offs 3 out of 5 years.

Would be interesting to see what RIT could do with 18 scholarships.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top