THis argument is like Groundhog Day. Same argument, different month (or maybe year?)
I tend not to interpret some of the posts the same way you do. I think that is #6.Alright. So let me take you through groundhog day:
1) Kepler says something unprovoked and inflammatory about our faith.
2) I respond showing how he is both baseless and without facts in his assertion.
3) He starts to explain, but in reality it's just more attacks.
4) You create a false equivalency between he and I - even though he just called your God a terrorist or some such.
5) I occasionally ask you about this.
6) You flame me.
So how about let's just skip steps 5 and 6.
2)without facts
THis argument is like Groundhog Day. Same argument, different month (or maybe year?)
1) Kepler says something unprovoked and inflammatory about our faith.
Q. How many Christians does it take to change a lightbulb?
A. That isn't funny.
What else is the Cafe but people saying something unprovoked and inflammatory? It is the peculiar entitlement of the dogmatically religious that nobody is allowed to say anything about their folie a deux. They are the bully who threatens everyone else in the schoolyard but if somebody insults them then they cry and run for mommy.
Toughen up. Your gods (both the OT Middle Eastern sociopath and the NT Silicon Valley entrepreneur) like men with a little more backbone.
Toughen up. Your gods (both the OT Middle Eastern sociopath and the NT Silicon Valley entrepreneur) like men with a little more backbone.
Dude, it's called faith for a reason. You have literally no facts to back you up.
I’m glad you’re back.
Very glad.
And that is not to say I don't appreciate most of what 5mn puts out there. He adds to the discussion, IMO, particularly when explaining his philosophy of Christianity.
I have lots of skeptic friends who are capable of having meaningful conversations on faith. The skeptics here just can't. If it gets real, they just walk away.
I would argue that tough is calling out intolerance when you see it and that being a bigot is quite cowardly.
The facts are that millions choose to turn to faith for self help.
The facts are that hundreds of millions are helped by faith via charity and volunteerism.
The facts are that skeptics here are so caught up in criticizing the means that they don't care whether people get helped or not.
People seeking and receiving help is good. There's no denying that. That's still not proof that your god exists. Millions of kids have faith in the Easter Bunny, and Tooth Fairy. Are they real?
I would argue that tough is calling out intolerance when you see it and that being a bigot is quite cowardly.
At least, we're agreed that the outcomes of Christianity are 'good'.
The base definition of Christianity has nothing to do with existence. Christianity is defined as a religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. And that definition explains the way in which millions get help.
The outcomes of Christianity are good? I’m not sure they’re all good. Do they do some good things? Yes. They also do some terrible things and have for centuries
The facts are that skeptics here are so caught up in criticizing the means that they don't care whether people get helped or not.
The base definition of Christianity has nothing to do with existence. Christianity is defined as a religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth...
And what you just wrote completely removes your sect from perhaps >95% of Christians, who believe that Jesus Christ is God made corporeal, and the embodiment of the Holy Spirit. One might even call it a Holy Trinity.
What you've described is essentially turning Christ into non-militaristic version of Sun Tzu.
The outcomes of Christianity are good? I’m not sure they’re all good. Do they do some good things? Yes. They also do some terrible things and have for centuries
Physician, heal thyself.
You're so caught up in defending Christianity that you don't care whether people get hurt or not.