Agnostic is just a modifier, ie an agnostic atheist simply doesn’t believ god exists based on a lack of evidence. Whereas a strong atheist believes that god doesn’t exist. I think people consider themselves “agnostic” but in reality they’re agnostic atheists.
I don’t think that’s true at all.
atheist is a term that generates a bunch of shocked looks from people more often than not.
Agnostic is just a modifier, ie an agnostic atheist simply doesn’t believ god exists based on a lack of evidence. Whereas a strong atheist believes that god doesn’t exist. I think people consider themselves “agnostic” but in reality they’re agnostic atheists.
Not any more. 40 years ago, or today in Dumbf-ckistan, maybe. But not today in civilization.
At this point "atheist" just means "intellectually honest agnostic." Either you're up for Russell's teapot or you're not. The idea that you're not certain there's a man in the sky but you're withholding judgment is cautious political correctness when surrounded by apes. It's a good idea when the low brows are about, but it's only for self-defense.
The great pursuit of science is that humanity is never likely to ever have a complete understand of how everything works. There will always be something to discover, something to drive our great minds to greater and greater knowledge.I don't believe there is a personifiable 'god' or 'gods' who sit in judgement of the rights and wrongs of humanity. I do think the universe and its laws of physics are definitely powers greater than humans, perhaps powers greater than humanity will ever fully understand.
So where does that fit me into your little boxes?![]()
I don't believe there is a personifiable 'god' or 'gods' who sit in judgement of the rights and wrongs of humanity. I do think the universe and its laws of physics are definitely powers greater than humans, perhaps powers greater than humanity will ever fully understand.
So where does that fit me into your little boxes?![]()
I don't believe there is a personifiable 'god' or 'gods' who sit in judgement of the rights and wrongs of humanity. I do think the universe and its laws of physics are definitely powers greater than humans, perhaps powers greater than humanity will ever fully understand.
So where does that fit me into your little boxes?![]()
Depends where you are, 12 years ago when I first started going to school at UMN people seemed kinda shocked and I was surprised given that we were definitely in civilization (perhaps you disagreeNot any more. 40 years ago, or today in Dumbf-ckistan, maybe.
I don't believe there is a personifiable 'god' or 'gods' who sit in judgement of the rights and wrongs of humanity. I do think the universe and its laws of physics are definitely powers greater than humans, perhaps powers greater than humanity will ever fully understand.
So where does that fit me into your little boxes?![]()
OK, I'll take a 5:30 a.m. off-the-cuff, partly tongue-in-cheek shot:
The ones with the higher rpm primal needs motors have survived in greater numbers, but their motors tend to keep spinning even after the basic hierarchy needs are met. So your drive to love and be loved (f ck and propagate), function within a social group with clearly identified leaders (herd instinct/leader of pack), and intellectual and philosophical curiosity (need to classify every new or different thing in your environment for risk assessment/survival purposes), to mention only a few evolutionary tools, has continued to apply itself to things other than warmth, hunger, f cking, and shelter, etc. And since we continue to work with the same basic set of tools, we will form groups of religions, philosophies, etc., just as we formed tribes and clans. It's all Darwinian, and it's fun if we let it be. Dangerous if we are unaware.
Some of this plays itself out on hockey boards and includes the babble you just read.
The ones with the higher rpm primal needs motors have survived in greater numbers, but their motors tend to keep spinning even after the basic hierarchy needs are met. So your drive to love and be loved (f ck and propagate), function within a social group with clearly identified leaders (herd instinct/leader of pack), and intellectual and philosophical curiosity (need to classify every new or different thing in your environment for risk assessment/survival purposes), to mention only a few evolutionary tools, has continued to apply itself to things other than warmth, hunger, f cking, and shelter, etc. And since we continue to work with the same basic set of tools, we will form groups of religions, philosophies, etc., just as we formed tribes and clans. It's all Darwinian, and it's fun if we let it be. Dangerous if we are unaware.
That made my brain hurt (not being caffeinated anymore and burnt from work)
So this makes me wonder- why do you need to do things labeled 'Christian'? Jesus was all about doing. I don't recall much of the Bible telling people to study, study, study. In fact I recall a whole lot of Jesus saying that the obsession with the 'Law' was misguided. That doing the right thing was way more important. If people are actively helping, doing things that fit with Christian Tenets why must they engage in 'Christian' activities? Serious question.
If believing there's a man in the sky makes you do nice things, then good -- do that.
You still don't get it. This has nothing to do with 'believing there's a man in the sky'. It has to do with the content giving support to millions. But if disbelieving there's a man in the sky gives you reason to feel superior -- do that.
Hopefully not on the sabbath.Tough to square that outlook with the first commandment, but I digress since we've beaten that horse to death.
But if disbelieving there's a man in the sky gives you reason to feel superior -- do that.