Re: Religion Thread: ...and suddenly, everyone's a theology scholar
Better said - Kepler.
Better said - Kepler.
You appear to be missing the point.
You aren't flawed. You're just turning to fairy tales to explain the parts of the world that can't be explained (yet). Some of those fairy tales are good advice, which people rarely follow. That hardly means they were "divinely inspired", or whatever you believe. Just written by regular blokes of above-average intelligence to try and control the mongrels, by instilling fear of a torturous, fiery afterlife.
That's what religion is on the day-to-day level with the orcs, yes. But religion also has its high brow components. There is always a gap between our aspiration and our reach ("or what's a heaven for?") and that is how faith can also fill an Emily Dickenson with wonder.
I don't mind the dummies thinking it's real. They're dummies. They weren't going anywhere anyway -- they have been on a quick road from birth to making more dummies to death for ten million years. But the smart people should stop tying themselves in knots. It's just a story, but it's a great story. It's interesting precisely because it is made up. We -- human beings -- made this. Without our imaginary worlds of fiction, including religion, we would be as boring as a tree or a rock. Our ability to bullsh-t is what makes us unique. No other animal just makes sh-t up.
No, I didn't miss the point at all, I'm just not going where you are.
The author and you have an agenda. I think that agenda is ridiculous and that it debases you because you are devaluing your faith by pretending it is veridical. The whole value of your faith is that it transcends reality.
If religion wants to compete with mere fact then religion loses because it's made up. But religion should be competing with the other made up stuff that makes life worth living: philosophy, law, aesthetics. That's your wheelhouse. Don't throw it away for a lump of mere reality. Reality is boring.
It is the great irony of the apologists for religion that they cling to the supernatural as if it were real. The whole point is exactly the opposite: by being a human extension of reality, by being the wish fulfillment that is the ground state of humans at our most primitive, religion is one of the greatest human inventions. It is not logical, it is in parallel with logic. But if you pretend it is logical you have to use slipshod reasoning, and logic will slice up your faith until it is just a little boy's sad, sordid lie.
Revel in the transcendence of faith. It is a spaceship to take us places where logic can't follow. That's its purpose. It will always be necessary for a variety of human purposes. "Salvation" is exactly that -- the salving of wounds that are human, and not actual phenomena.
It's a Tolkien novel in which Jesus is the "boy of destiny" character.
For all the "peace, tolerance, self-improvement" stuff that makes Buddhism trendy among yuppies, it's amazing how sexist that faith is, when you start looking into it.
The anti faith crowd is big on saying faith is irrational (just channeling their inner Rush Limbaugh to get there). New science shows that's not true.
Actually not quite that straightforward. Many Christians reject the widely-accepted notion that humans can actually "stop sinning," or ultimately do anything to merit forgiveness. If you instead interpret forgiveness according to St Paul's letter to the Romans as an unearned "gift," it removes the "pain/guilt" that accompanies the theology that you so aptly described. However; Jewish law did differentiate between presumptuous and less intentional sins (similar to your kid that occasionally screws up, and the one that repeatedly and consciously defies you)If you keep sinning and are Christian, deep down you know its wrong and in all likelihood, you will feel pain/guilt - the pain resulting from knowing you did wrong - and in essence, you won't be forgiven until you stop sinning. Its pretty straightforward.
Actually not quite that straightforward. Many Christians reject the widely-accepted notion that humans can actually "stop sinning," or ultimately do anything to merit forgiveness. If you instead interpret forgiveness according to St Paul's letter to the Romans as an unearned "gift," it removes the "pain/guilt" that accompanies the theology that you so aptly described. However; Jewish law did differentiate between presumptuous and less intentional sins (similar to your kid that occasionally screws up, and the one that repeatedly and consciously defies you)
I agree wholeheartedly. I believe St Paul covered that mindset in the first two verses of the same chapter. My interpretation is that a Christian ebbs toward a "sin-less" life out of thanksgiving and gratification for the fait accompli gift of grace; rather than from a motivation of guilt. Unfortunately, most of Christendom seems rooted in a sin-guilt-pain-indulgence-goodworks cycle.... Yet at the end of the day, there needs to be some way of taking action to improve, thereby sinning less...rather than brooding over past sins. This is accomplished by returning to God. The purpose of Romans here is to allow for this return to God rather than a green light to sin without ramifications ...
I agree wholeheartedly. I believe St Paul covered that mindset in the first two verses of the same chapter. My interpretation is that a Christian ebbs toward a "sin-less" life out of thanksgiving and gratification for the fait accompli gift of grace; rather than from a motivation of guilt. Unfortunately, most of Christendom seems rooted in a sin-guilt-pain-indulgence-goodworks cycle.
China, Eritrea, Iraq, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Syria were ranked “extreme” in the scale of anti-Christian persecution. Egypt, India and Iran were rated “high to extreme,” while Turkey was rated “moderate to high.”