What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

Brenthoven said:
Well, if he believes he's the Joker, remember when the Joker told Batman where he could find Dent and Rachel? It's a challenge to the police/etc to try and beat him.
Click to expand...

If he is going to go that far with it, why not dye his hair green instead of red?

Also, he* didn't tell them the truth. He switched the locations.

* The Joker, that is.
 
Last edited:
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

state of hockey said:
If he is going to go that far with it, why not dye his hair green instead of red?

Also, he* didn't tell them the truth. He switched the locations.

* The Joker, that is.
Click to expand...

He still told them the locations, is the point. And why red and not green? Well, the dude is insane, so don't ask me.
 
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

Old Pio said:
One lesson that came out of Columbine was that kids in high school need to let somebody know if a classmate is acting or talking stupidly. Annecdotally I've read of several incidents of possible violence thwarted because some kid told a teacher. Maybe that's an area where we can improve our chances. We don't want to become a nation of Margaret Hamiltons, sticking our long noses into other people's business, but perhaps we could be a trifle more observant and pro-active.

While none of the residents at Holmes' apartment complex or his colleagues at the University appear to bear any responsibility for his actions, wouldn't it have been nice if somebody had noticed his many deliveries and flaming red hair and any other goofy behavior and told somebody about it? It's true that all of his behavior (that we're aware of) can be explained away. It's not against the law to be odd. And we have a deeply ingrained cultural bias in favor of letting people "do their own thing." We're far more likely to report a barking dog than we are a guy acting strangely. Still, didn't anybody see or hear anything that raised a red flag? Evidently not.
Click to expand...

I'm willing to give schools more leeway in investigating rumors based on the fact that they have a responsibility to protect the students (who the fast majority are minors) when they are on school grounds.

I don't feel that receiving multiple packaged and dying ones hair a unusual color is probable cause for investigating someones behavior. The sad fact of the matter, is that in the case of the solitary actor, it is impossible to have enough evidence to justify any investigation until after they have acted.
 
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

Old Pio said:
Master of the paranoid understatement. My posts are more acceptable than hearing you continue to rave about trivial examples of imperfect parenting.
Click to expand...

HAHAHA! A girl not going to Disneyland isn't trivial? Oh man, that's some brilliant stuff right there.
 
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

Almington said:
I'm willing to give schools more leeway in investigating rumors based on the fact that they have a responsibility to protect the students (who the fast majority are minors) when they are on school grounds.

I don't feel that receiving multiple packaged and dying ones hair a unusual color is probable cause for investigating someones behavior. The sad fact of the matter, is that in the case of the solitary actor, it is impossible to have enough evidence to justify any investigation until after they have acted.
Click to expand...

It's not clear whether you're responding in part to my posts. I'm not talking about "probable cause" or "investigations." What I specifically mentioned was some resident of Holmes' complex complaining to management, which certainly has an obligation to check out tenants. You framed your post in legal language. And your conclusions are basically correct. But none of that should stop people from being a little more attentive.
 
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

Old Pio said:
It's not clear whether you're responding in part to my posts. I'm not talking about "probable cause" or "investigations." What I specifically mentioned was some resident of Holmes' complex complaining to management, which certainly has an obligation to check out tenants. You framed your post in legal language. And your conclusions are basically correct. But none of that should stop people from being a little more attentive.
Click to expand...
Are you suggesting his neighbors should have complained he was getting too many packages or dyed his hair?
 
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

MinnesotaNorthStar said:
Are you suggesting his neighbors should have complained he was getting too many packages or dyed his hair?
Click to expand...

Not exactly. It's possible someone might have seen packages with certain labels on them (particularly if they were delivered to the university). It's possible someone could have seen him trying on his body armor. Possible but not probable. I guess I'm supposing these weren't the only things he was doing/saying. We learned today, for instance, that he had a looney tunes message on his answering machine. It's a total package kinda thing.

Most of us would never consider ratting out a total stranger or neighbor. And only a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of nutcakes wind up doing what Holmes did. Still. Keeping your eyes open isn't exactly a revolutionary sentiment. In any case, the odds are extremely long that an observant neighbor or colleague would have reacted to his behavior. These guys don't glow in the dark. More's the pity.
 
Last edited:
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

Apparently this guy applied for a membership at a gun range, and they interviewed him and heard his voicemail message and rejected him.
 
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

Twitch Boy said:
Also suspect a second party may have been the one to prop the emergency exit open.
Click to expand...

This is what I thought after reading that someone was on a phone then went to the same emergency door as the shooter, otherwise how does the shooter open the emergency door? Aren't they usually locked from the outside?
 
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

SanTropez said:
This is what I thought after reading that someone was on a phone then went to the same emergency door as the shooter, otherwise how does the shooter open the emergency door? Aren't they usually locked from the outside?
Click to expand...

He bought a ticket, exited, and propped it open himself?
 
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

I kind of hope so, because good luck finding "Guy who propped open door while answering cell phone" otherwise. You'd be stuck hoping that ****** #1 called ****** #2 and told him to leave and prop the door.
 
Re: Rampage in Colorado Movie theater.

bronconick said:
I kind of hope so, because good luck finding "Guy who propped open door while answering cell phone" otherwise. You'd be stuck hoping that ****** #1 called ****** #2 and told him to leave and prop the door.
Click to expand...

Only so many cell towers in the area and not that heavy of volume of calls at that time. I think that it would be more then possible to find the person.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top