Re: Providence - 2009-10 What is in the glass?
Thats why it's called America pal, freedom of speach. If you can burn the flag you sure as heck can be positive about a hockey team
Speaches are tasty -- oh wait that's a peach. I think you meant to say speech. Vocab is fun!
Nobody said you weren't entitled to your opinion. It's your total lack of perspective about every aspect of the game of hockey -- not just PC -- that's laughable. You're one of a kind of this board, that's for sure.
If you want to wallow in misery, good luck to you.
Who's wallowing in misery? They won 2 games. Great. Let's see them win 4,5,6 in a row and actually do something substantial in the Army era. Let's see them finish 5th or 6th and exceed expectations in a conference that's pretty thin this season. Seeing as that hasn't happened in......
Most BC fans(and coaches) would look at 3 straight losses to St Lawrence, BU and denver as a slide. When they do poorly you somehow find a silver lining and make it a positive.
That's hilarious, and ironic, coming from you. BC sucks alright. So if that 3-game losing streak was a slide -- what was PC doing for the last 2 months before Friday...hmmmm?? Just funny you never bother posting when the team goes through that, but you come on here and blast people for not wanting to throw the ticker-tape parade when they win their first games IN 2 FREAKING MONTHS.
Like I told you back in the fall, Hockey is a LONG SEASON -- as evidenced by you throwing a party when PC won games in October. Every team goes through a streak of a few losses or wins...most teams, however, don't drop 6 straight like PC has on an annual basis since Army took over. As far as BC goes, they're still a Top 10 team. The slide you're talking about isn't a slide really. 3 straight losses? With a short handed team? Playing one game in a baseball stadium? One game against the #1 team in their building? Seriously they suck, obviously their coaches and fans must be rethinking their entire approach.
Oh wait, they beat PC and Maine this week and outscored them 10-2. Looks like your definition of the "hottest team in the conference" needs to be revised.
PC wins 2 big conference games and you still want to set there and act like Eyoree from Winnie the Pooh
Actually I'm sitting, not setting. Winning these 2 games is a nice start. I wrote that. However I don't consider beating BU or Maine this season to be "big." Beating BC
would have been big -- but they were completely dominated in that game. But of course, you just scratch that performance up as a "joke" and pretend that it didn't happen.
The larger perspective is that they have a long way to go. They're still 4-8. They're still in 9th and still currently eliminated from participating in the Hockey East quarterfinals. Neither team they beat is all that good, sorry. This isn't the BU team that won a national title last year, and Maine's pretty weak for a #3 Hockey East team. Of course, if they weren't, they wouldn't have gotten hammered at BC on Friday since BC is in such a slide.
It is what it is. Your lack of perspective continues to be shocking. By your definition of success Paul Pooley would have been given a lifetime contract for his performance here. For me I expect more from this program than to get excited on January 17th that my team is in 9th place. Obviously I must be a real negative person not to be delighted about the team's performance -- as a whole -- so far.