What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

FlagDUDE08 said:
Then they can come in the legal way, and there will be no qualms.
Click to expand...

legal or not, they are needed. and more of them that are currently coming.

no whitey in boston is cleaning the loo in the office! no whitey is heading out to the fields in cali to pick lettuce or strawberries.
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Having a brain fade..

When do the gerrymander decisions come down? June?
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

joecct said:
Having a brain fade..

When do the gerrymander decisions come down? June?
Click to expand...

They were heard in this session, yes? Assuming that's the case, it's all in June.

ETA: Second to last paragraph: https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/procedures.aspx
 
Last edited:
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

joecct said:
Unless they change SCOTUS, pipe dream. But lawyers need to feed their families and if someone is footing the bill, by all means Don Quixote, have at it.
Click to expand...

If he wants to dream, let him. My thought is marriage has already sailed, so the next fight is "religious liberty (for Evangelicals only)."
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

MissThundercat said:
If he wants to dream, let him. My thought is marriage has already sailed, so the next fight is "religious liberty (for Evangelicals only)."
Click to expand...

do as I say, not as I do :)
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Yeah if it was Clarence then it is a problem...but he probably talks less to his wife than he does to the lawyers in his court ;)

This one just doesnt rank with me and is rather desperate.
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

The Supreme Court on Monday struck down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act.
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Handyman said:
...but he probably talks less to his wife than he does to the lawyers in his court ;)
Click to expand...

Doesn't that just make him average American working guy (talks to people at work more than spouse)?
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Huh.
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

The tenth only applies if it helps rich white men.
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

The Sicatoka said:
Doesn't that just make him average American working guy (talks to people at work more than spouse)?
Click to expand...

Christ, I hope not.
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Just made it tougher to sue your employer.
Thank god. I was worried that employers didn’t have enough leverage.
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Just made it tougher to sue your employer.
Thank god. I was worried that employers didn’t have enough leverage.
Click to expand...

Jobs over people. We are always told to vote that way. Now it's at the SCOTUS. That's a brick down from the wall.
 
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Just made it tougher to sue your employer.
Thank god. I was worried that employers didn’t have enough leverage.
Click to expand...

How would that impact lawsuits filed prior to the ruling handed down on whichever court case you're referencing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top